This is a front-end for the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, made by Christian Perfect. The idea is to provide OEIS entries in non-ancient HTML, and then to think about how they're presented visually. The source code is on GitHub.
%I A121719 #23 Sep 14 2020 21:47:04 %S A121719 4,6,8,9,20,22,24,26,28,30,33,36,39,40,42,44,46,48,50,55,60,62,63,64, %T A121719 66,68,69,70,77,80,82,84,86,88,90,93,96,99,100,110,112,114,116,118, %U A121719 120,121,130,132,134,136,138,140,143,144 %N A121719 Strings of digits which are composite regardless of the base in which they are interpreted. Exclude bases in which numbers are not interpretable. %C A121719 Comments from _Franklin T. Adams-Watters_: %C A121719 "Think of these as polynomials. E.g. 121 is the polynomial n^2+2n+1. There are three cases: %C A121719 "(1) If the coefficients (digits) all have a common factor, the result will be divisible by that factor. %C A121719 "(2) If the polynomial can be factored, the numbers will be composite. n^2+2n+1 = (n+1)^2, so it is always composite. %C A121719 "(3) Otherwise, look at the polynomial modulo primes up to its degree. For example, 112 (n^2+n+2, degree 2) modulo 2 is always 0, so it is always divisible by 2. %C A121719 "Note that condition (1) is really a special case of condition (2), where one of the factors is a constant. %C A121719 "If none of the above conditions apply, the polynomial will (probably) have prime values." %C A121719 From _Iain Fox_, Sep 02 2020: (Start) %C A121719 lim_{k->infinity} (1/k)*Sum_{i=1..k} a_c(i) > .3 if it exists, where a_c(n) is the characteristic function of a(n) (1 if n is in a(n), otherwise 0). %C A121719 If the Bunyakovsky conjecture is true, the list of reasons a number is in this sequence detailed by _Franklin T. Adams-Watters_ above is a complete list. %C A121719 If the Bunyakovsky conjecture and the Extended Riemann Hypothesis are true, the above limit equals 4340435807/13235512500 = 0.3279386... (proof by Ravi Fernando in link by Iain Fox). %C A121719 All members of A008592 except 1 and 10 are in this sequence. %C A121719 (End) %H A121719 Iain Fox, <a href="/A121719/b121719.txt">Table of n, a(n) for n = 1..10000</a> %H A121719 Iain Fox, <a href="https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3810150/what-percentage-of-positive-integers-written-in-base-10-are-composite-regardle/">What percentage of positive integers, written in base 10, are composite regardless of what base they are interpreted in?</a>, Math StackExchange, September 2020. %H A121719 Ed Pegg, Jr., <a href="https://mathworld.wolfram.com/BouniakowskyConjecture.html">Bouniakowsky Conjecture</a>. %H A121719 Eric W. Weisstein, <a href="https://mathworld.wolfram.com/ExtendedRiemannHypothesis.html">Extended Riemann Hypothesis</a>. %H A121719 Wikipedia, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bunyakovsky_conjecture">Bunyakovsky conjecture</a>. %H A121719 Wikipedia, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalized_Riemann_hypothesis">Generalized Riemann Hypothesis</a>. %e A121719 String 55 in every base in which it is interpretable is divisible by 5. String 1001 in base a is divisible by a+1. Hence 55 and 1001 both belong to this sequence. %o A121719 (PARI) is(n)=if(n<10, return(!isprime(n)&&n>1)); if(content(n=digits(n))>1, return(1)); if(vecsum(factor(n*=vectorv(#n, i, x^(#n-i)))[,2])>1, return(1)); forprime(p=2, #n-1, for(x=1, p, if(eval(n)%p, next(2))); return(1)); for(x=vecmax(Vec(n))+1, +oo, if(isprime(eval(n)), return(0))) \\ _Iain Fox_, Aug 31 2020 %Y A121719 Supersequence: A002808. %Y A121719 Cf. A008592, A267509. %K A121719 nonn,easy,base %O A121719 1,1 %A A121719 _Tanya Khovanova_, Sep 08 2006 %E A121719 More terms from _Franklin T. Adams-Watters_, Sep 12 2006