This is a front-end for the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, made by Christian Perfect. The idea is to provide OEIS entries in non-ancient HTML, and then to think about how they're presented visually. The source code is on GitHub.
%I A193456 #17 Oct 14 2015 12:37:59 %S A193456 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,16,20,25,30,36,42,49,56,64,80,100,125,150, %T A193456 180,216,252,294,343,400,500,625,750,900,1080,1296,1512,1764,2058, %U A193456 2500,3125,3750,4500,5400,6480,7776,9072,10584,12500,15625,18750,22500,27000 %N A193456 Paradigm shift sequence with procedure length p=4. %C A193456 This sequence is the solution to the following problem: "Suppose you have the choice of using one of three production options: apply a simple action, bundle all existing actions (which requires p =4 steps), or apply the current bundled action. The first use of a novel bundle erases (or makes obsolete) all prior actions. How many total actions (simple) can be applied in n time steps?" %C A193456 1. This problem is structurally similar to the Copy and Paste Keyboard problem: Existing sequences (A178715 and A193286) should be regarded as Paradigm-Shift Sequences with Procedural Lengths p=1 and 2, respectively. %C A193456 2. The optimal number of pastes per copy, as measured by the geometric growth rate (p+z root of z), is z = 6. [Non-integer maximum between 5 and 6.] %C A193456 3. The function a(n) = maximum value of the product of the terms k_i, where Sum (k_i) = n+ 4 - 4*i_max %C A193456 4. All solutions will be of the form a(n) = m^b * (m+1)^d %H A193456 Jonathan T. Rowell, <a href="https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/journals/JIS/VOL18/Rowell/rowell3.html">Solution Sequences for the Keyboard Problem and its Generalizations</a>, Journal of Integer Sequences, Vol. 18 (2015), Article 15.10.7. %F A193456 a(n) = %F A193456 a(8:10) = 8; 9; 10 [C=1 below] %F A193456 a(18:20) = 49; 56; 88 [C=2 below] %F A193456 a(28:29) = 294; 343 [C=3 below] %F A193456 a(38:39) = 1764; 2058 [C=4 below] %F A193456 a(48) = 10584 [C=5 below] %F A193456 a(58) = 63504 [C=6 below] %F A193456 a(1:67) = m^(C-R) * (m+1)^R %F A193456 where C = floor((n+2)/10) +1 [min C=1] %F A193456 m = floor ((n+4)/C)-4, and R = n+4 mod C %F A193456 a(n>=68) = 5^b * 6^(C-b-d) * 7^d %F A193456 where C = floor((n+2)/10) +1 %F A193456 R = n+2 mod 10 %F A193456 b = max(0, 8-R); d = max(0, R-8) %F A193456 Recursive: for n>=69, a(n)=6*a(n-10) %e A193456 For n = 18, a(18) uses the general formula given for n in [1:67], but uses C=2 (rather than C=3). m = floor(22/2)-4 = 7; R = 22 mod 2 = 0; therefore a(18) = 7^(2-0)*8^0 = 49 %e A193456 For n=37, a(37) has: C = floor(39/10) +1 = 3+1=4. m = floor(41/4)-4 = 10-4=6, R = 41 mod 4 = 1; therefore, a(37) = 6^(4-1)*7^(1) = 6^3 *7 = 1512. %Y A193456 Paradigm shift sequences: A000792, A178715, A193286, A193455, A193456, and A193457 for p=0,1,...,5. %K A193456 nonn %O A193456 1,2 %A A193456 _Jonathan T. Rowell_, Jul 26 2011