A283302 Maximum number of pairs of primes (p,q) such that p < q <= prime(n) and p + q = constant.
0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 10, 11, 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 13, 13, 14, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 20, 21, 21, 22, 23, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 25, 26, 27, 27, 28, 29, 30, 30, 30, 30, 30, 30, 30, 30, 30, 30, 30
Offset: 1
Keywords
Examples
a(1)=0 because there are no two distinct primes less than or equal to prime(1)=2. a(2)=1 because there are only two distinct primes less than or equal to prime(2)=3, and then there is only one sum among them: 2 + 3 = 5. a(3)=1 because the three pairs of distinct primes less than or equal to prime(3)=5, i.e., (2,3), (3,5), and (2,5), produce different sums: 2 + 3 = 5, 3 + 5 = 8, and 2 + 5 = 7. a(6)=2 because among all pairs of distinct primes taken from the first six primes, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 13, there are at most two pairs with same sum, e.g., 3 + 13 = 5 + 11 = 16. a(8)=3 because among all pairs of distinct primes taken from the first eight primes, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, and 19, there are at most three pairs with the same sum, i.e., 5 + 19 = 7 + 17 = 11 + 13 = 24.
Links
- Charles R Greathouse IV, Table of n, a(n) for n = 1..10000
Programs
-
Mathematica
a[n_]:=Module[{fp,fps,fpst,fpstt,fpstts,fpsttst}, fp=Prime[Range[n]]; fps=Subsets[fp,{2}]; fpst=Table[Total[fps[[j]]],{j,1,Length[fps]}]; fpstt=fpst//Tally; fpstts=fpstt//Sort[#,#1[[2]]>#2[[2]]&]&; If [n<2,0,fpsttst=fpstts//Transpose;fpsttst[[2]]//Max]//Return]; Table[a[n],{n,1,120}]
-
PARI
first(n)=my(v=vector(n), P=primes(n), H=vectorsmall((P[#P]+P[#P-1])/2)); v[2]=1; for(n=3, #P, for(i=2, n-1, H[(P[n]+P[i])/2]++); v[n]=vecmax(H)); v \\ Charles R Greathouse IV, Mar 06 2017
Formula
a(n) >> n/log n. In particular, lim inf a(n) * (log n)/n >= 1/4. - Charles R Greathouse IV, Mar 06 2017
Comments