cp's OEIS Frontend

This is a front-end for the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, made by Christian Perfect. The idea is to provide OEIS entries in non-ancient HTML, and then to think about how they're presented visually. The source code is on GitHub.

A341092 Rows of Pascal's triangle which contain a 3-term arithmetic progression of a certain form: a(n) = (2n^2 + 22n + 37 + (2n + 3)*(-1)^n)/8.

Original entry on oeis.org

7, 12, 14, 21, 23, 32, 34, 45, 47, 60, 62, 77, 79, 96, 98, 117, 119, 140, 142, 165, 167, 192, 194, 221, 223, 252, 254, 285, 287, 320, 322, 357, 359, 396, 398, 437, 439, 480, 482, 525, 527, 572, 574, 621, 623, 672, 674, 725, 727, 780, 782, 837, 839, 896, 898, 957, 959
Offset: 1

Views

Author

J. Stauduhar, Feb 13 2022

Keywords

Comments

Also, a(2k-1)=(k+2)^2-2; a(2k)=(k+3)^2-4, k>=1.
Conjecture (67) in Ralf Stephan's paper, "Prove or Disprove. 100 Conjectures from the OEIS" asks if it is true that: "The numbers n such that the n-th row of Pascal's triangle contains an arithmetic progresion are n = 19 ∨ n = (1/8)*[2*k^2 + 22k + 37 + (2k + 3)*(-1)^k], k > 0."
Proof: Let (n)_(k) denote the falling factorial. With any integer i>=3:
For a(n) = i^2-2, if we set x=binomial(i,2), and y=binomial(i-1,2), we can calculate three integers in arithmetic progression, {a,b,c}, such that a=[(x+y-2)(y-2)*(y*(y-1))]/y!, b=[(x+y-2)(y-2)*(x*y)]/y!, c =[(x+y-2)_(y-2)*(x*(x-1))]/y!; {a,b,c}={C(i^2-2,y-2), C(i^2-2,y-1), C(i^2-2, y)}.
For a(n) = (i+1)^2-4, if we set x=binomial(i+1,2), and y=binomial(i,2), we can calculate three integers in arithmetic progression, {a,b,c}, such that a=[(x+y-4)(y-4)*(y)(y-4)]/y!, b=[(x+y-4)(y-4)*(x)(2)*(y)(2)]/y!, c =[(x+y-4)(y-4)*(x)_(x-4)]/y!; {a,b,c}={C((i+1)^2-4,y-4), C((i+1)^2-4,y-2 ), C((i+1)^2-4,y)}.
Although row 19 contains a 3-term arithmetic progression it doesn't fit the pattern found here, so 19 is not in this sequence.
Conjecture 1: Row 19 is the only row that contains a 3-term AP that doesn't fit the pattern found here.
Conjecture 2: No row contains an AP of more than three coefficients.
A brute-force search of n<=1100 found no counterexample of either conjecture above.

Examples

			With n=2, k=binomial(n+2=4,2)=6. m=binomial(n+3=5,2)-4+k=12. [C(m,k-4), C(m,k-2), C(m,k)] = [66,495,924], and [C(m+2,k-2), C(m+2,k-1), C(m+2,k)] = [1001,2002,3003], so a(2)=m=12 and a(3)=m+2=14.
		

Crossrefs

Programs

  • PARI
    a(n) = (2*n^2 + 22*n + 37 + (2*n + 3)*(-1)^n)/8 \\ Charles R Greathouse IV, Apr 02 2022
  • Python
    seq=[]
    for n in range(2,101):
        k=int(((n)*(n+1))/2)
        m=int(((n+1)*(n+2))/2)-4+k
        if n==2:
            seq.append(m+2)
        else:
            seq.append(m)
            seq.append(m+2)
    print(seq)