cp's OEIS Frontend

This is a front-end for the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, made by Christian Perfect. The idea is to provide OEIS entries in non-ancient HTML, and then to think about how they're presented visually. The source code is on GitHub.

A359504 a(n) is calculated by considering in ascending order all products P of zero or more terms from {a(1..n-1)} until finding one where P+1 has a prime factor not in {a(1..n-1)}, in which case a(n) is the smallest such prime factor.

Original entry on oeis.org

2, 3, 7, 5, 11, 23, 31, 17, 43, 47, 13, 67, 71, 79, 29, 59, 19, 103, 53, 107, 37, 131, 139, 73, 83, 167, 89, 179, 61, 41, 191, 101, 211, 109, 223, 239, 127, 263, 137, 283, 97, 151, 311, 331, 173, 347, 359, 367, 383, 193, 197, 419, 431, 439, 443, 149, 113, 227, 463
Offset: 1

Views

Author

Joel Brennan, Jan 03 2023

Keywords

Comments

A new prime is always found since at worst P can be the product of all primes {a(1..n-1)} and per Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes, P+1 then certainly has a prime factor not among a(1..n-1).
Taking products P in ascending order generally results in smaller quantities to consider than always taking the product of all primes as done in A000945, the Euclid-Mullin sequence.
Conjecture: P+1 has at most one prime factor not already in the sequence, so the requirement of taking "the smallest such" is unnecessary.

Examples

			For n=1, the sole product P is the empty product P=1, and P+1 = 2 is itself prime so a(1) = 2.
For n=3, the primes so far are 2,3 but products P=2 or P=3 have P+1 = 3 or 4 which have no new prime factor. Product P = 2*3 = 6 has P+1 = 7 which is a new prime so a(3) = 7.
For n=4, the smallest product P with a new prime in P+1 is P = 2*7 = 14 for which P+1 = 15 and a(4) = 5 is its smallest new prime factor.
		

Crossrefs

Extensions

More terms from Kevin Ryde, Jan 10 2023