cp's OEIS Frontend

This is a front-end for the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, made by Christian Perfect. The idea is to provide OEIS entries in non-ancient HTML, and then to think about how they're presented visually. The source code is on GitHub.

Showing 1-4 of 4 results.

A113460 Triangle read by rows: n-th row is the lexicographically earliest arithmetic progression of n numbers all having the same prime signature.

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 2, 3, 3, 5, 7, 5, 11, 17, 23, 5, 11, 17, 23, 29, 7, 37, 67, 97, 127, 157, 7, 157, 307, 457, 607, 757, 907, 11, 1210241, 2420471, 3630701, 4840931, 6051161, 7261391, 8471621, 11, 32671181, 65342351, 98013521, 130684691, 163355861, 196027031, 228698201, 261369371
Offset: 1

Views

Author

David Wasserman, Jan 08 2006

Keywords

Comments

Presumably this triangle will differ from that in A130791 after some point. - N. J. A. Sloane, Sep 22 2007
Apart from the initial term, this sequence coincides with A130791 for at least the first 210 rows. - David W. Wilson, Sep 22 2007

Examples

			Triangle begins:
  1;
  2,   3;
  3,   5,   7;
  5,  11,  17,  23;
  5,  11,  17,  23,  29;
  7,  37,  67,  97, 127, 157;
  ...
From _M. F. Hasler_, Oct 10 2024: (Start)
For row 1, we can take 1, which is the only integer to have prime signature {}.
For row 2, we can't use 1 (no two integers with that prime signature), but primes 2 & 3 are a valid and then also minimal choice.
For row 3, primes {3, 5, 7} are a valid choice and also smallest: we can't use 1, nor 2, for reasons of parity: the next prime would be odd but the third term of the arithmetic progression would then again be even and not prime.
  The same reasoning also excludes any higher power 2^m as starting term, which would require the same (m-th) power of odd primes as subsequent terms.
For rows 4 and 5, we can't start with the prime 3, because the 4th term of any arithmetic progression starting with 3 is again divisible by 3. Also 4 = 2^2 is excluded, see above. Thus, 5 is the smallest possible starting term for n = 4 and 5.
For row 6 and 7, we again can't start with a prime < nextprime(6) = 7, because there can't be more than 5 primes in AP starting with 5: the sixth term would always be divisible by 5 again. To start with the even semiprime 6 = 2*3 would require an AP of even semiprimes. Dividing by 2, we would have an AP of 6 primes starting with 3, which is impossible.(*) So, 7 is the smallest possibility.
(* This actually excludes all even semiprimes 2*p between prime(k-1) and prime(k) from being a starting term of a row in that range, because that would yield an AP of >= prime(k-1) primes starting with p < prime(k)/2 < prime(k-1), impossible.)
Rows 8 through 11 can't start with a prime < nextprime(8) = 11, as before. We have also excluded any 2^m and 2*3 as starting value. Starting with 9 = 3^2 would require an AP of squares of primes, but all larger squares of primes have a difference (6k +- 1)^2 - (6m +- 1)^2 divisible by 12, which is not the case for the difference with 3^2 = 9. The even semiprime 10 = 2*5 was also excluded above (*). Therefore, 11 is the smallest possible initial term. And so on. (End)
		

Crossrefs

Cf. A113459 (leading terms).

Extensions

Erroneous commas in sequence deleted by N. J. A. Sloane, Sep 22 2007

A113461 Common differences of arithmetic progressions in A113460.

Original entry on oeis.org

0, 1, 2, 6, 6, 30, 150, 1210230, 32671170, 224494620, 1536160080, 1482708889200
Offset: 1

Views

Author

David Wasserman, Jan 08 2006

Keywords

Comments

Apart from the initial term, does this sequence coincide with A061558? Does A113460 coincide with A130791? - N. J. A. Sloane, Sep 22 2007
Apart from the initial term, this sequence coincides with A061558 for at least the first 210 terms. - David W. Wilson, Sep 22 2007

Crossrefs

A113459 Least number that begins an arithmetic progression of n numbers with the same prime signature.

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 2, 3, 5, 5, 7, 7, 11, 11, 11, 11, 13
Offset: 1

Views

Author

David Wasserman, Jan 08 2006

Keywords

Comments

Initial terms of arithmetic progressions described in A113460. - N. J. A. Sloane, Oct 18 2007
Conjecture: For n > 1, a(n) = A007918(n). - David Wasserman, Jan 08 2006
I disagree with that conjecture! Ignoring the initial terms, this will agree with A007918 up to some point and then (presumably) drop below A007918. The initial term in the arithmetic progression (of length n) must be >= n, but it is likely to be less than A007918(n) if n is large. - N. J. A. Sloane, Oct 18 2007

Crossrefs

Extensions

Edited by N. J. A. Sloane, Jul 01 2008 at the suggestion of R. J. Mathar.

A120302 Last term of arithmetic progression of primes described in A130791, A007918, A061558.

Original entry on oeis.org

2, 3, 7, 23, 29, 157, 907, 8471621, 261369371
Offset: 1

Views

Author

N. J. A. Sloane, Oct 17 2007

Keywords

Crossrefs

Apart from leading term, agrees with A127781 for many terms. Where is the first difference?
Showing 1-4 of 4 results.