A305924 -id:A305924 - cp's OEIS frontend

A305933 Irregular table read by rows: row n >= 0 lists all k >= 0 such that the decimal representation of 3^k has n digits '0' (conjectured).

0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 19, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 31, 34, 68, 10, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 25, 29, 43, 47, 50, 52, 63, 72, 73, 22, 30, 32, 33, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 44, 45, 46, 48, 51, 53, 56, 58, 60, 61, 62, 64, 69, 71, 83, 93, 96, 108, 111, 123, 136, 21, 37, 49, 67, 75, 81, 82, 87, 90, 105, 112, 121, 129

Offset: 0

M. F. Hasler, Jun 14 2018

The set of nonempty rows is a partition of the nonnegative integers.
Read as a flattened sequence, a permutation of the nonnegative integers.
In the same way, another choice of (basis, digit, base) = (m, d, b) different from (3, 0, 10) will yield a similar partition of the nonnegative integers, trivial if m is a multiple of b.
It remains an open problem to provide a proof that the rows are complete, just as each of the terms of A020665 is unproved.
We can also decide that the rows are to be truncated as soon as no term is found within a sufficiently large search limit. (For all of the displayed rows, there is no additional term up to many orders of magnitude beyond the last term.) That way the rows are well-defined, but we are no longer guaranteed to get a partition of the integers.
The author finds the idea of partitioning the integers in this elementary yet highly nontrivial way appealing, as is the fact that the initial rows are just roughly one line long. Will this property continue to hold for large n, or if not, how will the row lengths evolve?

			The table reads:
n \ k's
0 : 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 19, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 31, 34, 68 (cf. A030700)
1 : 10, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 25, 29, 43, 47, 50, 52, 63, 72, 73
2 : 22, 30, 32, 33, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 44, 45, 46, 48, 51, 53, 56, 58, 60, 61, 62, 64, 69, 71, 83, 93, 96, 108, 111, 123, 136
3 : 21, 37, 49, 67, 75, 81, 82, 87, 90, 105, 112, 121, 129
4 : 35, 59, 65, 66, 70, 74, 77, 79, 88, 98, 106, 116, 117, 128, 130, 131, 197, 205
5 : 57, 76, 78, 80, 86, 89, 91, 92, 101, 102, 104, 109, 115, 118, 122, 127, 134, 135, 164, 166, 203, 212, 237
...
The first column is A063555: least k such that 3^k has n digits '0' in base 10.
Row lengths are 23, 15, 31, 13, 18, 23, 23, 25, 16, 17, 28, ... (A305943).
Last term of the rows (i.e., largest k such that 3^k has exactly n digits 0) are (68, 73, 136, 129, 205, 237, 317, 268, 251, 276, 343, ...), A306113.
Inverse permutation is (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 23, 10, 11, 12, 13, 24, 25, 26, 27, 14, 28, 69, 38, 15, 16, 29, 17, 18, 19, 30, 39, 20, ...), not in OEIS.

Cf. A030700, A063555.
Cf. A305932 (analog for 2^k), A305924 (analog for 4^k), ..., A305929 (analog for 9^k).
Cf. A305934: powers of 3 with exactly one '0', A305943: powers of 3 with at least one '0'.

apply( A305933_row(n,M=50*n+70)=select(k->#select(d->!d,digits(3^k))==n,[0..M]), [0..10])
print(apply(t->#t,%)"\n"apply(vecmax,%)"\n"apply(t->t-1,Vec(vecsort(concat(%),,1)[1..99]))) \\ to show row lengths, last elements, and inverse permutation.

A305929 Irregular table: row n >= 0 lists all k >= 0 such that the decimal representation of 9^k has n digits '0' (conjectured).

Original entry on oeis.org

0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 17, 34, 5, 8, 9, 10, 25, 26, 36, 11, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 48, 54, 68, 41, 45, 56, 33, 35, 37, 44, 49, 53, 58, 64, 65, 38, 39, 40, 43, 46, 51, 52, 59, 61, 67, 82, 83, 106, 42, 47, 62, 66, 69, 72, 73, 76, 84, 89, 144, 27, 50

Offset: 0

M. F. Hasler, Jun 19 2018

The set of (nonempty) rows forms a partition of the nonnegative integers.
Read as a flattened sequence, a permutation of the nonnegative integers.
In the same way, another choice of (basis, digit, base) = (m, d, b) different from (9, 0, 10) will yield a similar partition of the nonnegative integers, trivial if m is a multiple of b.
It remains an open problem to provide a proof that the rows are complete, in the same way as each of the terms of A020665 is unproved.
We can also decide that the rows are to be truncated as soon as no term is found within a sufficiently large search limit. (For all of the displayed rows, there is no additional term up to many orders of magnitude beyond the last term.) That way the rows are well-defined, but it is no longer guaranteed to have a partition of the integers.
The author finds this sequence "nice", i.e., appealing (as well as, e.g., the variant A305933 for basis 3) in view of the idea of partitioning the integers in such an elementary yet highly nontrivial way, and the remarkable fact that the rows are just roughly one line long. Will this property remain for large n, or else, how will the row lengths evolve?

			The table reads:
n \ k's
0 : 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 17, 34 (= A030705)
1 : 5, 8, 9, 10, 25, 26, 36
2 : 11, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 48, 54, 68
3 : 41, 45, 56
4 : 33, 35, 37, 44, 49, 53, 58, 64, 65
5 : 38, 39, 40, 43, 46, 51, 52, 59, 61, 67, 82, 83, 106
...
Column 0 is A063626: least k such that 9^k has n digits '0' in base 10.
Row lengths are 12, 7, 18, 3, 9, 13, 11, 11, 6, 9, 17, 15, 12, 9, 11, 6, 9, 9, ... (A305939).
Last element of the rows (largest exponent such that 9^k has exactly n digits 0) are (34, 36, 68, 56, 65, 106, 144, 134, 119, 138, 154, ...), A306119.
Inverse permutation is (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 5, 6, 13, 14, 15, 19, 7, 8, 9, 20, 21, 10, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 16, 17, 73, 29, 30, 31, 32, ...), not in OEIS.

M. F. Hasler, Zeroless powers.. OEIS Wiki, March 2014.

Cf. A030705, A063626.

Cf. A305932 (analog for 2^k), A305933 (analog for 3^k), A305924 (analog for 4^k), ..., A305928 (analog for 8^k).

mx = 1000; g[n_] := g[n] = DigitCount[9^n, 10, 0]; f[n_] := Select[Range@mx, g@# == n &]; Table[f@n, {n, 0, 4}] // Flatten (* Robert G. Wilson v, Jun 20 2018 *)

apply( A305929_row(n,M=50*(n+1))=select(k->#select(d->!d,digits(9^k))==n,[0..M]), [0..10])
print(apply(t->#t,%)"\n"apply(vecmax,%)"\n"apply(t->t-1,Vec(vecsort(concat(%),,1)[1..99]))) \\ to show row lengths, last terms and the inverse permutation

Row n consists of the integers in (row n of A305933 divided by 2).

A305932 Irregular table: row n >= 0 lists all k >= 0 such that the decimal representation of 2^k has n digits '0' (conjectured).

Original entry on oeis.org

0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 24, 25, 27, 28, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 49, 51, 67, 72, 76, 77, 81, 86, 10, 11, 12, 17, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 50, 57, 58, 65, 66, 68, 71, 73, 74, 75, 84, 85, 95, 96, 122, 124, 129, 130, 149, 151, 184, 43, 53, 61, 69, 70

Offset: 0

M. F. Hasler, Jun 14 2018

A partition of the nonnegative integers (the rows being the subsets).
Although it remains an open problem to provide a proof that the rows are complete (as are all terms of A020665), we can assume it for the purpose of this sequence.
Read as a flattened sequence, a permutation of the nonnegative integers.

			The table reads:
n \ k's
0 : 0, 1, ..., 9, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 24, 25, 27, (...), 81, 86 (cf. A007377)
1 : 10, 11, 12, 17, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 44, (...), 151, 184
2 : 42, 52, 54, 55, 56, 59, 60, 62, 63, 64, 78, 80, 82, 92, 107, (...), 171, 231
3 : 43, 53, 61, 69, 70, 83, 87, 89, 90, 93, 109, 112, 114, 115, (...), 221, 359
4 : 79, 91, 94, 97, 106, 118, 126, 127, 137, 139, 157, 159, 170, (...), 241, 283
5 : 88, 98, 99, 103, 104, 113, 120, 143, 144, 146, 152, 158, 160, (...), 343, 357
...
Column 0 is A031146: least k such that 2^k has n digits '0' in base 10.
Row lengths = number of powers of 2 with exactly n '0's = (36, 41, 31, 34, 25, 32, 37, 23, 43, 47, 33, 35, 29, 27, 27, 39, 34, 34, 28, 29, ...): not in the OEIS.
Largest number in row n = (86, 229, 231, 359, 283, 357, 475, 476, 649, 733, 648, 696, 824, 634, 732, 890, 895, 848, 823, 929, 1092, ...): not in the OEIS.
Row number of n = Number of '0's in 2^n = A027870: (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, ...).
Inverse permutation (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 36, 37, 38, 10, 11, 12, 13, 39, 14, 15, 40, 41, 42, 43, 16, 17, 44, 18, 19, 45, 46, 20, 21, ...) is not in the OEIS.

M. F. Hasler, Zeroless powers, OEIS Wiki, March 2014.

Cf. A007377, A031146.
Sequence A027870 yields the row number of a given integer.
Cf. A305933 (analog for 3^n), A305924 (for 4^n), ..., A305929 (for 9^n).

mx = 1000; g[n_] := g[n] = DigitCount[2^n, 10, 0]; f[n_] := Select[Range@mx, g@# == n &]; Table[f@n, {n, 0, 4}] // Flatten (* Robert G. Wilson v, Jun 20 2018 *)

apply( A305932_row(n,M=200*(n+1))=select(k->A027870(k)==n,[0..M]), [0..20]) \\ A027870(k)=#select(d->!d, digits(2^k))

Row n = { k >= 0 | A027870(k) = n }.

A071531 Smallest exponent r such that n^r contains at least one zero digit (in base 10).

Original entry on oeis.org

10, 10, 5, 8, 9, 4, 4, 5, 1, 5, 4, 6, 7, 4, 3, 7, 4, 4, 1, 5, 3, 6, 6, 4, 6, 5, 5, 4, 1, 6, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5, 3, 4, 5, 1, 5, 3, 3, 4, 2, 5, 2, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, 2, 4, 2, 5, 4, 6, 3, 1, 5, 6, 3, 2, 4, 6, 3, 9, 3, 1, 2, 6, 3, 3, 4, 8, 4, 2, 3, 1, 4, 5, 5, 2, 4, 3, 3, 6, 3, 1, 5, 5, 3, 3, 2, 7, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1

Offset: 2

Paul Stoeber (paul.stoeber(AT)stud.tu-ilmenau.de), Jun 02 2002

For all n, a(n) is at most 40000, as shown below. Is 10 an upper bound?
If n has d digits, the numbers n, n^2, ..., n^k have a total of about N = k*(k+1)*d/2, and if these were chosen randomly the probability of having no zeros would be (9/10)^N. The expected number of d-digit numbers n with f(n)>k would be 9*10^(d-1)*(9/10)^N. If k >= 7, (9/10)^(k*(k+1)/2)*10 < 1 so we would expect heuristically that there should be only finitely many n with f(n) > 7. - Robert Israel, Jan 15 2015
The similar definition using "...exactly one digit 0..." would be ill-defined for all multiples of 100 and others (1001, ...). - M. F. Hasler, Jun 25 2018
When r=40000, one of the last five digits of n^r is always 0. Working modulo 10^5, we have 2^r=9736 and 5^r=90625, and both of these are idempotent; also, if gcd(n,10)=1, then n^r=1, and if 10|n, then n^r=0. Therefore the last five digits of n^r are always either 00000, 00001, 09736, or 90625. In particular, a(n) <= 40000. - Mikhail Lavrov, Nov 18 2021

			a(4)=5 because 4^1=4, 4^2=16, 4^3=64, 4^4=256, 4^5=1024 (has zero digit).

Robert Israel, Table of n, a(n) for n = 2..10000
OEIS Wiki, Zeroless powers (2014).

Cf. A305941 for the actual powers n^k.
Cf. A007377, A030700, A030701, A008839, A030702, A030703, A030704, A030705, A030706, A195944: decimal expansion of k^n contains no zeros, k = 2, 3, 4, ...
Cf. A305932, A305933, A305924, ..., A305929: row n = {k: x^k has n 0's}, x = 2, 3, ..., 9.
Cf. A305942, ..., A305947, A305938, A305939: #{k: x^k has n 0's}, x = 2, 3, ..., 9.
Cf. A306112, ..., A306119: largest k: x^k has n 0's; x = 2, 3, ..., 9.

f:= proc(n) local j;
for j from 1 do if has(convert(n^j,base,10),0) then return j fi od:
end proc:
seq(f(n),n=2..100); # Robert Israel, Jan 15 2015

zd[n_]:=Module[{r=1},While[DigitCount[n^r,10,0]==0,r++];r]; Array[zd,110,2] (* Harvey P. Dale, Apr 15 2012 *)

A071531(n)=for(k=1, oo, vecmin(digits(n^k))||return(k)) \\ M. F. Hasler, Jun 23 2018

def a(n):
    r, p = 1, n
    while 1:
        if "0" in str(p):
            return r
        r += 1
        p *= n
[a(n) for n in range(2, 100)] # Tim Peters, May 19 2005

a(n) >= 1 with equality iff n is in A011540 \ {0} = {10, 20, ..., 100, 101, ...}. - M. F. Hasler, Jun 23 2018

A305925 Irregular table read by rows in which row n >= 0 lists all k >= 0 such that the decimal representation of 5^k has n digits '0' (conjectured).

Original entry on oeis.org

0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 17, 18, 30, 33, 58, 8, 12, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 26, 31, 41, 42, 43, 85, 13, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29, 32, 36, 37, 56, 57, 107, 34, 35, 38, 39, 50, 54, 59, 74, 75, 84, 112, 40, 44, 46, 47, 49, 51, 60, 73, 78, 79, 82, 83, 86, 88, 89, 95, 96, 97, 106, 113, 127

Offset: 0

M. F. Hasler, Jun 19 2018

The set of (nonempty) rows is a partition of the nonnegative integers.
Read as a flattened sequence, a permutation of the nonnegative integers.
In the same way, another choice of (basis, digit, base) = (m, d, b) different from (5, 0, 10) will yield a similar partition of the nonnegative integers, trivial if m is a multiple of b.
It remains an open problem to provide a proof that the rows are complete, in the same way as each of the terms of A020665 is unproved.
We can also decide that the rows are to be truncated as soon as no term is found within a sufficiently large search limit. (For all of the displayed rows, there is no additional term up to many orders of magnitude beyond the last term.) That way the rows are well-defined, but we are no more guaranteed to get a partition of the integers.
The author finds this sequence "nice", i.e., appealing (as well as, e.g., the variant A305933 for basis 3) in view of the idea of partitioning the integers in such an elementary yet highly nontrivial way, and the remarkable fact that the rows are just roughly one line long. Will this property remain for large n, or else, how will the row lengths evolve?

			The table reads:
n \ k's
0 : 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 17, 18, 30, 33, 58 (cf. A008839)
1 : 8, 12, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 26, 31, 41, 42, 43, 85
2 : 13, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29, 32, 36, 37, 56, 57, 107
3 : 34, 35, 38, 39, 50, 54, 59, 74, 75, 84, 112
4 : 40, 44, 46, 47, 49, 51, 60, 73, 78, 79, 82, 83, 86, 88, 89, 95, 96, 97, 106, 113, 127
5 : 48, 55, 61, 67, 77, 91, 102, 110, 111, 126, 148, 157
...
The first column is A063585: least k such that 5^k has n digits '0' in base 10.
Row lengths are 16, 16, 12, 11, 21, 12, 17, 14, 16, 17, 14, 13, 16, 18, 13, 14, 10, 10, 21, 7,... (A305945).
Last terms of the rows are (58, 85, 107, 112, 127, 157, 155, 194, 198, 238, 323, 237, 218, 301, 303, 324, 339, 476, 321, 284, ...), A306115.
The inverse permutation is (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 16, 8, 9, 10, 17, 32, 18, 19, 20, 11, 12, 21, 22, 23, 24, 33, 34, 25, 26, 35, 36, 37, 13, 27,...), not in OEIS.

Cf. A008839, A063585.

Cf. A305932 (analog for 2^k), A305933 (analog for 3^k), A305924 (analog for 4^k), ..., A305929 (analog for 9^k).

mx = 1000; g[n_] := g[n] = DigitCount[5^n, 10, 0]; f[n_] := Select[Range@mx, g@# == n &]; Table[f@n, {n, 0, 4}] // Flatten (* Robert G. Wilson v, Jun 20 2018 *)

apply( A305925_row(n,M=60*(n+1))=select(k->#select(d->!d,digits(5^k))==n,[0..M]), [0..19])

A305928 Irregular table: row n >= 0 lists all k >= 0 such that the decimal representation of 8^k has n digits '0' (conjectured).

Original entry on oeis.org

0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 17, 24, 27, 4, 7, 10, 15, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 32, 43, 14, 18, 20, 21, 26, 36, 37, 39, 45, 47, 49, 50, 55, 57, 77, 23, 29, 30, 31, 38, 41, 44, 51, 52, 58, 61, 42, 53, 59, 62, 65, 69, 33, 40, 48, 56, 60, 64, 73, 76, 80, 86, 114, 119, 35, 46

Offset: 0

M. F. Hasler, Jun 19 2018

The set of (nonempty) rows forms a partition of the nonnegative integers.
Read as a flattened sequence, a permutation of the nonnegative integers.
In the same way, another choice of (basis, digit, base) = (m, d, b) different from (8, 0, 10) will yield a similar partition of the nonnegative integers, trivial if m is a multiple of b.
It remains an open problem to provide a proof that the rows are complete, in the same way as each of the terms of A020665 is unproved.
We can also decide that the rows are to be truncated as soon as no term is found within a sufficiently large search limit. (For all of the displayed rows, there is no additional term up to many orders of magnitude beyond the last term.) That way the rows are well-defined, but it is no longer guaranteed to have a partition of the integers.

			The table reads:
n \ k's
0 : 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 17, 24, 27 (= A030704)
1 : 4, 7, 10, 15, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 32, 43
2 : 14, 18, 20, 21, 26, 36, 37, 39, 45, 47, 49, 50, 55, 57, 77
3 : 23, 29, 30, 31, 38, 41, 44, 51, 52, 58, 61
4 : 42, 53, 59, 62, 65, 69
5 : 33, 40, 48, 56, 60, 64, 73, 76, 80, 86, 114, 119
...
Column 0 is A063596: least k such that 8^k has n digits '0' in base 10.
Row lengths are 14, 11, 15, 11, 6, 12, 10, 7, 14, 21, 9, 9, 15, 8, 6, 10, 8, 13, ... (not in the OEIS).
The inverse permutation is (0, 1, 2, 3, 14, 4, 5, 15, 6, 7, 16, 8, 9, 10, 25, 17, 18, 11, 26, 19, 27, 28, 20, 40, 12, 21, 29, 13, 22, ...), also not in the OEIS.

M. F. Hasler, Zeroless powers.. OEIS Wiki, March 2014

Cf. A030704, A063596.

Cf. A305932 (analog for 2^k), A305933 (analog for 3^k), A305924 (analog for 4^k), ..., A305929 (analog for 9^k).

mx = 1000; g[n_] := g[n] = DigitCount[8^n, 10, 0]; f[n_] := Select[Range@mx, g@# == n &]; Table[f@n, {n, 0, 4}] // Flatten (* Robert G. Wilson v, Jun 20 2018 *)

apply( A305928_row(n,M=50*(n+1))=select(k->#select(d->!d,digits(8^k))==n,[0..M]), [0..7])

Row n consists of integers in row n of A305932 divided by 3.

A305926 Irregular table: row n >= 0 lists all k >= 0 such that the decimal representation of 6^k has n digits '0' (conjectured).

Original entry on oeis.org

0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 17, 24, 29, 44, 10, 11, 14, 15, 18, 22, 28, 40, 42, 59, 9, 16, 20, 21, 26, 30, 31, 33, 37, 38, 39, 45, 46, 49, 51, 53, 63, 13, 23, 25, 27, 32, 34, 35, 36, 47, 48, 54, 61, 72, 73, 76, 82, 19, 52, 60, 64, 65, 70, 71, 83, 91, 93, 98, 43, 50

Offset: 0

M. F. Hasler, Jun 19 2018

The set of (nonempty) rows forms a partition of the nonnegative integers.
Read as a flattened sequence, a permutation of the nonnegative integers.
In the same way, another choice of (basis, digit, base) = (m, d, b) different from (6, 0, 10) will yield a similar partition of the nonnegative integers, trivial if m is a multiple of b.
It remains an open problem to provide a proof that the rows are complete, in the same way as each of the terms of A020665 is unproved.
We can also decide that the rows are to be truncated as soon as no term is found within a sufficiently large search limit. (For all of the displayed rows, there is no additional term up to many orders of magnitude beyond the last term.) That way the rows are well-defined, but it is no longer guaranteed to have a partition of the integers.
The author finds this sequence "nice", i.e., appealing (as well as, e.g., the variant A305933 for basis 3) in view of the idea of partitioning the integers in such an elementary yet highly nontrivial way, and the remarkable fact that the rows are just roughly one line long. Will this property remain for large n, or else, how will the row lengths evolve?

			The table reads:
n \ k's
0 : 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 17, 24, 29, 44 (= A030702)
1 : 10, 11, 14, 15, 18, 22, 28, 40, 42, 59
2 : 9, 16, 20, 21, 26, 30, 31, 33, 37, 38, 39, 45, 46, 49, 51, 53, 63
3 : 13, 23, 25, 27, 32, 34, 35, 36, 47, 48, 54, 61, 72, 73, 76, 82
4 : 19, 52, 60, 64, 65, 70, 71, 83, 91, 93, 98
5 : 43, 50, 55, 58, 62, 66, 67, 75, 77, 78, 101, 106, 129, 134
...
Column 0 is A063596: least k such that 6^k has n digits '0' in base 10.
Row lengths are 14, 10, 17, 16, 11, 14, 10, 8, 12, 19, 9, 16, 13, 11, 10, 10, 11, 10, 10, 17, ... (A305946).
Last terms of the rows yield (44, 59, 63, 82, 98, 134, 108, 123, 199, 189, 192, 200, 275, 282, 267, 307, 298, 296, 391, 338, ...), A306116.
The inverse permutation is (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 24, 14, 15, 9, 41, 16, 17, 25, 10, 18, 57, 26, 27, 19, 42, 11, 43, 28, 44, 20, 12, 29, 30, ...), not in OEIS.

M. F. Hasler, Zeroless powers.. OEIS Wiki, March 2014.

Cf. A030702, A063596.

Cf. A305932 (analog for 2^k), A305933 (analog for 3^k), A305924 (analog for 4^k), ..., A305929 (analog for 9^k).

mx = 1000; g[n_] := g[n] = DigitCount[6^n, 10, 0]; f[n_] := Select[Range@mx, g@# == n &]; Table[f@n, {n, 0, 4}] // Flatten (* Robert G. Wilson v, Jun 20 2018 *)

apply( A305926_row(n,M=50*(n+1))=select(k->#select(d->!d,digits(6^k))==n,[0..M]), [0..19])

A305944 Number of powers of 4 having exactly n digits '0' (in base 10), conjectured.

Original entry on oeis.org

16, 22, 17, 14, 11, 19, 15, 15, 21, 20, 17, 22, 12, 13, 17, 24, 16, 19, 8, 17, 11, 15, 17, 15, 20, 17, 18, 20, 17, 21, 16, 19, 16, 14, 15, 19, 20, 24, 7, 16, 13, 14, 13, 14, 22, 22, 15, 18, 16, 16, 25

Offset: 0

M. F. Hasler, Jun 22 2018

a(0) = 16 is the number of terms in A030701 and in A238940, which includes the power 4^0 = 1.

These are the row lengths of A305924. It remains an open problem to provide a proof that these rows are complete (as are all terms of A020665), but the search has been pushed to many orders of magnitude beyond the largest known term, and the probability of finding an additional term is vanishing, cf. Khovanova link.

M. F. Hasler, Zeroless powers, OEIS Wiki, March 2014, updated 2018.
T. Khovanova, The 86-conjecture, Tanya Khovanova's Math Blog, Feb. 2011.
W. Schneider, No Zeros, 2000, updated 2003. (On web.archive.org--see A007496 for a cached copy.)

Cf. A030701 = row 0 of A305924: k such that 4^k has no 0's; A238940: these powers 4^k.
Cf. A020665: largest k such that n^k has no '0's.
Cf. A063575 = column 1 of A305924: least k such that 4^k has n digits '0' in base 10.
Cf. A305942 (analog for 2^k), ..., A305947, A305938, A305939 (analog for 9^k).

A305944(n,M=99*n+199)=sum(k=0,M,#select(d->!d,digits(4^k))==n)

A305944_vec(nMax,M=99*nMax+199,a=vector(nMax+=2))={for(k=0,M,a[min(1+#select(d->!d,digits(4^k)),nMax)]++);a[^-1]}

A305927 Irregular table: row n >= 0 lists all k >= 0 such that the decimal representation of 7^k has n digits '0' (conjectured).

Original entry on oeis.org

0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 19, 35, 4, 5, 8, 12, 14, 15, 18, 27, 43, 47, 51, 9, 16, 17, 20, 24, 26, 28, 29, 34, 38, 52, 93, 13, 21, 22, 23, 30, 31, 36, 37, 42, 44, 46, 49, 58, 25, 32, 33, 50, 53, 54, 59, 66, 122, 55, 56, 57, 61, 62, 64, 67, 72, 73, 74, 39, 40, 48, 60, 71, 77, 79, 96, 108

Offset: 0

M. F. Hasler, Jun 19 2018

The set of (nonempty) rows forms a partition of the nonnegative integers.
Read as a flattened sequence, a permutation of the nonnegative integers.
In the same way, another choice of (basis, digit, base) = (m, d, b) different from (7, 0, 10) will yield a similar partition of the nonnegative integers, trivial if m is a multiple of b.
It remains an open problem to provide a proof that the rows are complete, in the same way as each of the terms of A020665 is unproved.
We can also decide that the rows are to be truncated as soon as no term is found within a sufficiently large search limit. (For all of the displayed rows, there is no additional term up to many orders of magnitude beyond the last term.) That way the rows are well-defined, but it is no longer guaranteed to have a partition of the integers.
The author considers "nice", i.e., appealing, the idea of partitioning the integers in such an elementary yet highly nontrivial way, and the remarkable fact that the rows are just roughly one line long. Will this property remain for large n, or else, how will the row lengths evolve?

			The table reads:
n \ k's
0 : 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 19, 35 (= A030703)
1 : 4, 5, 8, 12, 14, 15, 18, 27, 43, 47, 51
2 : 9, 16, 17, 20, 24, 26, 28, 29, 34, 38, 52, 93
3 : 13, 21, 22, 23, 30, 31, 36, 37, 42, 44, 46, 49, 58
4 : 25, 32, 33, 50, 53, 54, 59, 66, 122
5 : 55, 56, 57, 61, 62, 64, 67, 72, 73, 74
...
Column 0 is A063606: least k such that 7^k has n digits '0' in base 10.
Row lengths are 10, 11, 12, 13, 9, 10, 9, 7, 10, 14, 21, 10, 18, 7, 11, 11, 12, 15, 17, 10, ... (A305947).
Last term of the rows are (35, 51, 93, 58, 122, 74, 108, 131, 118, 152, 195, 192, 236, 184, 247, 243, 254, 286, 325, 292, ...), A306117.
The inverse permutation is (0, 1, 2, 3, 10, 11, 4, 5, 12, 21, 6, 7, 13, 33, 14, 15, 22, 23, 16, 8, 24, 34, 35, 36, 25, 46, 26, 17, 27, 28, 37, ...), not in OEIS.
Number of '0's in 7^n = row number of n: (0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 2, 0, 0, 1, 3, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 0, 2, 3, 3, 3, 2, 4, 2, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, ...), not in OEIS.
Number of '0's in 7^n = row number of n: (0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 2, 0, 0, 1, 3, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 0, 2, 3, 3, 3, 2, 4, 2, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, ...), not in OEIS.

M. F. Hasler, Zeroless powers.. OEIS Wiki, March 2014.

Cf. A030703, A063606.

Cf. A305932 (analog for 2^k), A305933 (analog for 3^k), A305924 (analog for 4^k), ..., A305929 (analog for 9^k).

mx = 1000; g[n_] := g[n] = DigitCount[7^n, 10, 0]; f[n_] := Select[Range@mx, g@# == n &]; Table[f@n, {n, 0, 4}] // Flatten (* Robert G. Wilson v, Jun 20 2018 *)

apply( A305927_row(n,M=50*(n+1))=select(k->#select(d->!d,digits(7^k))==n,[0..M]), [0..19])

A306114 Largest k such that 4^k has exactly n digits 0 (in base 10), conjectured.

Original entry on oeis.org

43, 92, 77, 88, 115, 171, 182, 238, 235, 308, 324, 348, 412, 317, 366, 445, 320, 424, 362, 448, 546, 423, 540, 545, 612, 605, 567, 571, 620, 641, 619, 700, 708, 704, 808, 762, 811, 744, 755, 971, 896, 900, 935, 862, 986, 954, 982, 956, 1057, 1037, 1128

Offset: 0

M. F. Hasler, Jun 22 2018

a(0) is the largest term in A030701: exponents of powers of 4 without digit 0 in base 10.

There is no proof for any of the terms, just as for any term of A020665 and many similar / related sequences. However, the search has been pushed to many magnitudes beyond the largest known term, and the probability of any of the terms being wrong is extremely small, cf., e.g., the Khovanova link.

M. F. Hasler, Zeroless powers, OEIS Wiki, March 2014, updated 2018.
T. Khovanova, The 86-conjecture, Tanya Khovanova's Math Blog, Feb. 2011.
W. Schneider, No Zeros, 2000, updated 2003. (On web.archive.org--see A007496 for a cached copy.)

Cf. A063575: least k such that 4^k has n digits 0 in base 10.
Cf. A305944: number of k's such that 4^k has n digits 0.
Cf. A305924: row n lists exponents of 4^k with n digits 0.
Cf. A030701: { k | 4^k has no digit 0 } : row 0 of the above.
Cf. A238940: { 4^k having no digit 0 }.
Cf. A020665: largest k such that n^k has no digit 0 in base 10.
Cf. A071531: least k such that n^k contains a digit 0 in base 10.
Cf. A103663: least x such that x^n has no digit 0 in base 10.
Cf. A306112, ..., A306119: analog for 2^k, ..., 9^k.

A306114_vec(nMax,M=99*nMax+199,x=4,a=vector(nMax+=2))={for(k=0,M,a[min(1+#select(d->!d,digits(x^k)),nMax)]=k);a[^-1]}

cp's OEIS Frontend

A305933 Irregular table read by rows: row n >= 0 lists all k >= 0 such that the decimal representation of 3^k has n digits '0' (conjectured).

Views

Author

Keywords

Comments

Examples

Crossrefs

Programs

PARI

A305929 Irregular table: row n >= 0 lists all k >= 0 such that the decimal representation of 9^k has n digits '0' (conjectured).

Views

Author

Keywords

Comments

Examples

Links

Crossrefs

Programs

Mathematica

PARI

Formula

A305932 Irregular table: row n >= 0 lists all k >= 0 such that the decimal representation of 2^k has n digits '0' (conjectured).

Views

Author

Keywords

Comments

Examples

Links

Crossrefs

Programs

Mathematica

PARI

Formula

A071531 Smallest exponent r such that n^r contains at least one zero digit (in base 10).

Views

Author

Keywords

Comments

Examples

Links

Crossrefs

Programs

Maple

Mathematica

PARI

Python

Formula

A305925 Irregular table read by rows in which row n >= 0 lists all k >= 0 such that the decimal representation of 5^k has n digits '0' (conjectured).

Views

Author

Keywords

Comments

Examples

Crossrefs

Programs

Mathematica

PARI

A305928 Irregular table: row n >= 0 lists all k >= 0 such that the decimal representation of 8^k has n digits '0' (conjectured).

Views

Author

Keywords

Comments

Examples

Links

Crossrefs

Programs

Mathematica

PARI

Formula

A305926 Irregular table: row n >= 0 lists all k >= 0 such that the decimal representation of 6^k has n digits '0' (conjectured).

Views

Author

Keywords

Comments

Examples

Links

Crossrefs

Programs

Mathematica