cp's OEIS Frontend

This is a front-end for the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, made by Christian Perfect. The idea is to provide OEIS entries in non-ancient HTML, and then to think about how they're presented visually. The source code is on GitHub.

Showing 1-5 of 5 results.

A354169 a(0) = 0, a(1) = 1, a(2) = 2; for k >= 2, given a(k), the sequence is extended by adjoining two terms: a(2*k-1) = smallest m >= 0 not among a(0) .. a(k) such that {m, a(k), a(k+1), ..., a(2*k-2)} are pairwise disjoint in binary, and a(2*k) = smallest m >= 0 not among a(0) .. a(k) such that {m, a(k), ..., a(2*k-1)} are pairwise disjoint in binary.

Original entry on oeis.org

0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 3, 16, 32, 64, 12, 128, 256, 512, 17, 1024, 34, 2048, 4096, 8192, 68, 16384, 136, 32768, 65536, 131072, 768, 262144, 524288, 1048576, 1025, 2097152, 18, 4194304, 2080, 8388608, 16777216, 33554432, 12288, 67108864, 134217728, 268435456, 16388
Offset: 0

Views

Author

N. J. A. Sloane, Jun 05 2022

Keywords

Comments

The paper by De Vlieger et al. (2022) calls this the "binary two-up sequence".
"Pairwise disjoint in binary" means no common 1-bits in their binary representations.
This is a set-theory analog of A090252. It bears the same relation to A090252 as A252867 does to A098550, A353708 to A121216, A353712 to A347113, etc.
A consequence of the definition, and also an equivalent definition, is that this is the lexicographically earliest infinite sequence of distinct nonnegative numbers with the property that the binary representation of a(n) is disjoint from (has no common 1's with) the binary representations of the following n terms.
An equivalent definition is that a(n) is the smallest nonnegative number that is disjoint (in its binary representation) from each of the previous floor(n/2) terms.
For the subsequence 0, 3, 12, 17, 34, ... of the terms that are not powers of 2 see A354680 and A354798.
All terms are the sum of at most two powers of 2 (see De Vlieger et al., 2022). - N. J. A. Sloane, Aug 29 2022

Examples

			After a(2) = 2 = 10_2, a(3) must equal ?0?_2, and the smallest such number we have not seen is a(3) = 100_2 = 4, and a(4) must equal ?00?_2, and the smallest such number we have not seen is a(4) = 1000_2 = 8.
		

Crossrefs

A355889 is a more efficient way to present this sequence.

Programs

Extensions

More terms from Rémy Sigrist, Jun 06 2022

A354780 a(n) is the bitwise OR of (the binary expansions of) b(n+1) to b(2*n), where b is A354169.

Original entry on oeis.org

2, 12, 27, 115, 252, 1004, 2013, 4031, 16307, 32631, 65279, 261375, 524270, 2096110, 4194253, 8386527, 16773119, 67096575, 134217659, 536854459, 1073741623, 2147450751, 4294901759, 17179672575, 34359737599, 137438690559, 274877382143, 549754765311, 2199022205950, 4398044412927, 8796093022189, 35184367894509, 70368744175567
Offset: 1

Views

Author

N. J. A. Sloane, Jul 05 2022

Keywords

Comments

If the binary expansion of a(n) has a 1 in the 2^i's bit (for any i >= 0) then A354169(2*n+1) must have a 0 in that bit.
A354169(2*n+1) is the smallest number not yet in A354169 which satisfies that condition (this follows at once from the definition of A354169).
This sequence bears the same relation to A354169 as A355057 does to A090252.

Examples

			Consider n=6. Then b(7) to b(12) are 32, 64, 12, 128, 256, 512. The bitwise OR of those 6 numbers is 1111101100_2 = 1004_10 = a(6). The bitwise complement of 1004_10 is 10011_2 = 19_10 = A354781(6), and A354169(6) = 17_10 = 10001_2.
On the other hand, for n=5, b(6) to b(10) are 16, 32, 64, 12, 128, whose bitwise OR is 11111100_2 = 252_10 = a(5). The bitwise complement of 252_10 is 3_10 = 11_2 = A354781(5). However, 3 has already appeared in A354169, and the smallest available number whose binary expansion is disjoint from 252_10 = 11111100_2 is 2^8 = 100000000_2 = 256_10 = 2^8 = A354169(5).
		

Crossrefs

A354781 If the binary expansion of A354780(n) is 1 d_1 d_2 ... d_k, then the binary expansion of a(n) is c_1 c_2 ... c_k, where c_i = 1 - d_i.

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 3, 4, 12, 3, 19, 34, 64, 76, 136, 256, 768, 17, 1041, 50, 2080, 4096, 12288, 68, 16452, 200, 32896, 65536, 196608, 768, 262912, 524800, 1048576, 1049601, 2098176, 18, 4194322, 2096, 8390656, 16777216, 50331648, 12288, 67121152, 134225920, 268435456, 268451844, 536887296, 72, 1073741896, 32960, 2147516416, 4294967296, 12884901888
Offset: 1

Views

Author

N. J. A. Sloane, Jul 05 2022

Keywords

Examples

			See A354780.
		

Crossrefs

A354793 Hamming weight of A354783(n).

Original entry on oeis.org

0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 0, 1, 1, 2, 0, 2, 2, 3, 1, 2, 0, 1, 1, 3, 1, 2, 0, 1, 1, 2, 0, 2, 2, 3, 1, 3, 1, 2, 0, 1, 1, 2, 0, 2, 2, 3, 1, 3, 1, 2, 0, 1, 1, 2, 0, 2, 2, 3, 1, 2, 0, 1, 1, 3, 1, 2, 0, 2, 2, 3, 1, 3, 1, 2, 0, 1, 1, 2, 0, 2, 2, 3, 1, 2, 0, 1, 1, 3, 1, 2, 0, 2, 2, 3, 1, 3, 1, 2, 0, 1, 1, 2, 0, 2, 2, 3, 1, 2
Offset: 1

Views

Author

N. J. A. Sloane, Jul 19 2022

Keywords

Comments

Conjecture: This sequence appears to have a simple structure. Encode it by making the following substitutions, in this order:
Replace the initial 28 terms 0011201120223120113120112022 by S (as usual, the start is irregular), then map:
3 1 3 -> 7
3 1 2 -> 6
1 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 2 -> 9
0 1 1 -> 2
0 2 2 -> 4
Then it appears that the encoded sequence is the concatenation of the following blocks:
S
79
79(6264)^1
79(6264)^1
79(6264)^3
79(6264)^3
79(6264)^15
79(6264)^15
79(6264)^31
79(6264)^31
79(6264)^63
79(6264)^63
79(6264)^127
79(6264)^127
...
This is probably not the most efficient encoding, but I was happy to find any one that revealed the structure.
From Michel Dekking, Jul 23 2022: (Start)
The following is another way to present the conjecture above, which shows the close connection with sequence A355150.
Conjecture: It appears that this sequence is almost a periodic sequence, with period 12. Let x:=A354789.
If n > 28, n == 5 (mod 12) is not an element of x then (written as words)
a(n)a(n+1)...a(n+11) = 312011312022.
If n > 28, n == 5 (mod 12) is an element of x then
a(n)a(n+1)...a(n+11) = 313120112022.
(End)

Crossrefs

A355889 Concatenate the exponents of the powers of 2 in A354169(k) in increasing order, for k = 1, 2, 3, ...

Original entry on oeis.org

0, 1, 2, 3, 0, 1, 4, 5, 6, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 0, 4, 10, 1, 5, 11, 12, 13, 2, 6, 14, 3, 7, 15, 16, 17, 8, 9, 18, 19, 20, 0, 10, 21, 1, 4, 22, 5, 11, 23, 24, 25, 12, 13, 26, 27, 28, 2, 14, 29, 3, 6, 30, 7, 15, 31, 32, 33, 16, 17, 34, 35, 36, 8, 18, 37, 9, 19, 38, 39, 40, 0, 20, 41, 10, 21, 42, 43, 44, 1, 22, 45, 4, 5, 46
Offset: 1

Views

Author

Rémy Sigrist and N. J. A. Sloane, Jul 20 2022

Keywords

Comments

It is conjectured that the Hamming weight of A354169(k) is always 0, 1, or 2. This is known to be true for at least the first 2^25 terms. (The present sequence is well-defined even if the conjecture is false.)
So this is a far more efficient way to present A354169 than by listing the decimal expansions.
The terms of A354169 that are pure powers of 2 appear in order, so it is obvious how to recover A354169 from this sequence.
This could be regarded as a table with (presumably) two columns, and could therefore have keyword "tabf", but that is not really appropriate, since basically it consists of the nonnegative integers with some interjections.

Examples

			A354169 begins 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 3, 16, 32, 64, 12, 128, ... We ignore the initial 0, and then the binary expansions are 2^0, 2^1, 2^2, 2^3, 2^0+2^1, 2^4, 2^5, 2^6, 2^2+2^3, 2^7, ..., so the present sequence begins 0, 1, 2, 3, 0, 1, 4, 5, 6, 2, 3, 7, ...
		

Crossrefs

Showing 1-5 of 5 results.