A143807
Number of geodesics between a pair of perfect states in the Tower of Hanoi with 4 pegs and n disks.
Original entry on oeis.org
1, 2, 2, 22, 40, 18, 2468, 11698, 11426, 2178, 74056628
Offset: 1
Jason Behrstock (jason(AT)math.columbia.edu), Sep 01 2008
Sequence
A007664 gives the lengths of the geodesics being counted by the present sequence (conjecturally this is true for all n; experimentally it is true for the first 20 terms)
A160002
Number of moves needed to solve 4-peg Tower of Hanoi Puzzle with n disks.
Original entry on oeis.org
0, 3, 10, 19, 34, 57, 88, 123, 176, 253, 342, 449, 572, 749, 980, 1261, 1560, 1903, 2328, 2889, 3562, 4377, 5276, 6247
Offset: 0
For n=2, 10 moves needed:
0: {1,2},{},{},{}
1: {2},{1},{},{}
2: {2},{},{1},{}
3: {2},{},{},{1}
4: {},{2},{},{1}
5: {},{},{2},{1}
6: {},{},{1,2},{}
7: {},{1},{2},{}
8: {},{1},{},{2}
9: {},{},{1},{2}
10: {},{},{},{1,2}
- Baidu, Four Pillar Tower of Hanoi Upgraded Version (Chinese web page with the problem and first 13 terms).
- P. Bastian, D. Kranzlmüller, H. Brüchle, and G. Mathias, High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering, Garching/Munich 2022, page 255.
- A. M. Hinz, B. Lužar, and C. Petr, The Dudeney-Stockmeyer Conjecture, Discrete Appl. Math. 319 (2022) 19-26.
- KeyTo9_Fans, A picture showing the best moving pattern for n<=32
- Paul K. Stockmeyer, Variations on the Four-Post Tower of Hanoi Puzzle, Congressus Numerantium 102 (1994), pp. 3-12.
- Paul K. Stockmeyer and Fred Lunnon, New Variations on the Tower of Hanoi.
- Index entries for sequences related to Towers of Hanoi
Values up to n=19 checked and Yang's bound proved to equal a(20) by
Paul Zimmermann, Feb 21 2018
Values for n=21,22,23 added by
Ciril Petr, May 03 2023
A382111
Maximum number of moves required to transition from the initial configuration (all disks on the first peg) to any possible configuration in the Towers of Hanoi puzzle with 4 pegs and n disks.
Original entry on oeis.org
0, 1, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 25, 33, 41, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 130, 161, 193, 225, 257, 294
Offset: 0
Comments