A007229 Number of distinct perforation patterns for deriving (v,b) = (n+2,n) punctured convolutional codes from (4,1).
38, 264, 2016, 15504, 122661, 986700, 8064576, 66756144, 558689224, 4719593312, 40193414112, 344721646640, 2974925353455, 25814778578820, 225105551191680, 1971557711151600, 17336058626562984, 152984380665537760
Offset: 2
Keywords
References
- Guy Bégin, On the enumeration of perforation patterns for punctured convolutional codes, Séries Formelles et Combinatoire Algébrique, 4th colloquium, 15-19 Juin 1992, Montréal, Université du Québec à Montréal, pp. 1-10.
- N. J. A. Sloane and Simon Plouffe, The Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, Academic Press, 1995 (includes this sequence).
Links
- Guy Bégin and David Haccoun, High rate punctured convolutions codes: Structure properties and construction techniques, IEEE Transactions on Communications 37(12) (1989), 1381-1385.
- David Haccoun and Guy Bégin, High rate punctured convolutional codes for Viterbi and sequential coding, IEEE Transactions on Communications, 37(11) (1989), 1113-1125; see Section II.
Programs
-
Maple
with(NumberTheory): P := proc(b, v0) local k: add(phi(k)*(1+z^k)^(v0*(b/k)), k=divisors(b))/b end: seq(coeff(P(b, 4), z, b+2), b=2..19); # Pab Ter
-
Mathematica
P[b_, v0_] := Sum[EulerPhi[k]*(1+z^k)^(v0*(b/k)), {k, Divisors[b]}]/b; Table[Coefficient[P[b, 4], z, b+2], {b, 2, 19}] (* Jean-François Alcover, Feb 17 2023, after Pab Ter's Maple code *)
Formula
From Petros Hadjicostas, Jul 27 2020: (Start)
The number of perforation patterns to derive high-rate convolutional code (v,b) (written as R = b/v) from a given low-rate convolutional code (v0, 1) (written as R = 1/v0) is (1/b)*Sum_{k|gcd(v,b)} phi(k)*binomial(v0*b/k, v/k).
According to Pab Ter's Maple code, this is the coefficient of z^v in the polynomial (1/b)*Sum_{k|b} phi(k)*(1 + z^k)^(v0*b/k).
Here (v,b) = (n+2,n) and (v0,1) = (4,1), so
a(n) = (1/n)*Sum_{k|gcd(n+2,n)} phi(k)*binomial(4*n/k, (n+2)/k).
This simplifies to
a(n) = (1/n)*(binomial(4*n, n+2) + [(n mod 2) == 0]*binomial(2*n, (n/2) + 1)).
(Even though these formulas do not appear in the two published papers in the IEEE Transactions on Communications, from the theory in those two papers, it makes sense to replace "k|b" with "k|v0*b" (and "k|gcd(v,b)" with "k|gcd(v,v0*b)"). Pab Ter, however, uses "k|b" in the Maple program below.) (End)
Extensions
More terms from Pab Ter (pabrlos2(AT)yahoo.com), Nov 13 2005
Comments