cp's OEIS Frontend

This is a front-end for the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, made by Christian Perfect. The idea is to provide OEIS entries in non-ancient HTML, and then to think about how they're presented visually. The source code is on GitHub.

Showing 1-6 of 6 results.

A362938 a(n) = minimum number of pieces needed to dissect a regular n-sided polygon into a monotile, i.e. a polygonal tile which tiles the plane (conjectured).

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 1, 2, 1, 3, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 4, 3, 5, 4, 6
Offset: 3

Views

Author

N. J. A. Sloane, Aug 29 2023

Keywords

Comments

I do not know which of these values have been proved to be minimal. Probably only a(n) for n = 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 10.
The three related sequences A110312, A362938, A362939 are exceptions to the usual OEIS policy of requiring that all terms in sequences must be known exactly. These sequences are included because of their importance and in the hope that someone will establish the truth of some of the conjectured values.
More formally, a(n) = minimum number of pieces needed to dissect a regular n-sided polygon into a monotile, that is, a prototile for a monohedral tiling of the plane.
Turning over is allowed. The pieces must be bounded by simple curves to avoid difficulties with non-measurable sets.
The definitions imply that a(n) <= A362939(n) <= A110312(n).
On Aug 31 2023 Gavin Theobald sent me two different solutions for a(9) = 3 and one solution for a(11) = 4 (see links). He reports that he found these dissections in the 1990's. In his email and in a later email (Sep 04 2023) he also gives the values a(13) = 5, a(14) = 3, a(15) = 5 (with one piece turned over), a(16) = a(18) = 4, a(20) = 5. He conjectures that a(2t) = floor(t/2) for all t >= 2.

References

  • Branko Grünbaum and G. C. Shephard, Tilings and Patterns. W. H. Freeman, New York, 1987. [The sequence is defined in Section 2.6, pp. 91-95.]
  • Harry Lindgren, Geometric Dissections, Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ, 1964. Plates B6, B7, B8, B9, B10, and B12 illustrate n = 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 12, respectively. One would expect that plates B11 and B13 would refer to n = 11 and 13, but in fact they appear to give alternative solutions for n = 10 and 12, respectively.
  • Harry Lindgren, Recreational Problems in Geometric Dissections and How to Solve Them, Revised and enlarged by Greg Frederickson, Dover Publications, NY, 1972.

Crossrefs

Extensions

a(9) = 3, a(11) = 4, a(13) = 5, a(14) = 3, a(16) = 4 from Gavin Theobald, Aug 31 2023 - Sep 11 2023.
Updated with many further illustrations from Gavin Theobald. - N. J. A. Sloane, Sep 19 2023

A362939 a(n) = minimum number of pieces needed to dissect a regular n-sided polygon into a rectangle (conjectured).

Original entry on oeis.org

2, 1, 4, 3, 5, 4, 7, 4, 9, 5, 10, 7, 10, 9
Offset: 3

Views

Author

N. J. A. Sloane, Aug 31 2023

Keywords

Comments

The dimensions of the rectangle can be anything you want, as long as it is a rectangle.
Turning over is allowed. The pieces must be bounded by simple curves to avoid difficulties with non-measurable sets.
Apart from changing "square" to "rectangle", the rules are the same as in A110312.
I do not know which of these values have been proved to be minimal. Probably only a(3)=2 and a(4)=1.
The three related sequences A110312, A362938, A362939 are exceptions to the usual OEIS policy of requiring that all terms in sequences must be known exactly. These sequences are included because of their importance and in the hope that someone will establish the truth of some of the conjectured values.
The definitions imply that A362938(n) <= a(n) <= A110312(n).

Examples

			See our paper "On dissecting polygons into rectangles" for illustrations of a(n) for all n <= 16 except n=13 and n=15.
		

Crossrefs

A110000 Minimal number of polygonal pieces in a dissection of a regular n-gon to an equilateral triangle (conjectured).

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 4, 6, 5, 8, 7, 8, 7
Offset: 3

Views

Author

N. J. A. Sloane, Sep 11 2005

Keywords

Comments

I do not know which of these values have been proved to be minimal.
Turning over is allowed. The pieces must be bounded by simple curves to avoid difficulties with non-measurable sets.

Examples

			a(3) = 1 trivially.
a(4) <= 4 because there is a 4-piece dissection of an equilateral triangle into a square, due probably to H. Dudeney, 1902 (or possible C. W. McElroy - see Fredricksen, 1997, pp. 136-137). Surely it is known that this is minimal? See illustrations.
Coffin gives a nice description of this dissection. He notes that the points marked * are the midpoints of their respective edges and that ABC is an equilateral triangle. Suppose the square has side 1, so the triangle has side 2/3^(1/4). Locate B on the square by measuring 1/3^(1/4) from A, after which the rest is obvious.
For n >= 5 see the Theobald web site.
		

References

  • G. N. Frederickson, Dissections: Plane and Fancy, Cambridge, 1997.
  • H. Lindgren, Geometric Dissections, Van Nostrand, Princeton, 1964.
  • H. Lindgren (revised by G. N. Frederickson), Recreational Problems in Geometric Dissections and How to Solve Them, Dover, NY, 1972.

Crossrefs

A110356 Array read by antidiagonals: T(n,k) (n>=3, k>=3) = minimal number of polygonal pieces in a dissection of a regular n-gon to a regular k-gon (conjectured).

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 4, 4, 6, 1, 6, 5, 6, 6, 5
Offset: 3

Views

Author

N. J. A. Sloane, Sep 11 2005

Keywords

Comments

I do not know which of these values have been proved to be minimal.
Turning over is allowed. The pieces must be bounded by simple curves to avoid difficulties with non-measurable sets.
See A110312 for further references and illustrations.

Examples

			Array begins:
1 4 6 5 8 7 ... <= A110000
4 1 6 5 7 5 9 ... <= A110312
6 6 1 7 ...
5 5 7 1 ...
8 7 ...
...
		

References

  • G. N. Frederickson, Dissections: Plane and Fancy, Cambridge, 1997.

Crossrefs

Row 3 gives A110000, row 4 gives A110312.

A214367 Denominators of continued fraction convergents to ( sqrt(4*sqrt(3)-3) - 1 )/4.

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 4, 53, 57, 110, 167, 277, 444, 721, 119409, 120130, 239539, 1557364, 1796903, 3354267, 15213971, 109852064, 2871367635, 2981219699, 14796246431, 17777466130, 50351178691, 68128644821, 186608468333, 254737113154, 696082694641, 950819807795, 2597722310231, 13939431358950
Offset: 1

Views

Author

Jean-Claude Babois, Feb 20 2013

Keywords

Comments

This constant arises as the edge-length of one of the pieces in the classical 4-piece dissection of a square to an equilateral triangle (see references in A110312).

Crossrefs

Programs

  • Mathematica
    Denominator[Convergents[(Sqrt[4 Sqrt[3] - 3] - 1)/4, 50]]

Extensions

Edited by N. J. A. Sloane, Apr 08 2013 at the request of Jean-Claude Babois
Mathematica code corrected to agree with terms by Ray Chandler, Mar 13 2017

A141292 Conjectured values for minimal number of pieces required in a 2n-gon to square dissection that uses translation alone.

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 5, 9, 12, 15, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 35, 38, 42, 47, 50, 53, 56, 60, 63, 67, 72, 76, 79, 82, 85, 89, 93, 100, 103, 106, 109, 113, 117, 121, 126, 130, 133, 136, 139, 143, 147, 156, 160, 163, 166, 169, 174, 177, 182, 186, 189, 192, 196, 202, 205, 214, 217, 220, 223
Offset: 2

Views

Author

Pamela Pierce (PPierce(AT)wooster.edu), Jeffrey Willert (jwillert09(AT)wooster.edu) and Wenyuan Wu (wwu11(AT)wooster.edu), Aug 01 2008, Aug 12 2008

Keywords

Examples

			a(2)=1 because a regular 4-gon-to-square dissection can be accomplished with a single "piece". Busschop gave a 5-piece hexagon-to-square dissection using translations alone,so a(3)=5 (see Frederickson, p. 118). Further terms in the sequence are obtained by a systematic process for cutting the original 2n-gon, and the algorithm for generating these terms is given below. - Pamela Pierce (ppierce(AT)wooster.edu), Sep 03 2009
		

References

  • Boltyanskii, V.G., Equivalent and Equidecomposable Figures, D.C. Heath and Company, Boston, 1963.
  • G. N. Frederickson, Dissections Plane and Fancy, Camb. 1997.

Crossrefs

Cf. A110312.

Programs

  • Mathematica
    b1 := (n, k) -> 2*sin(Pi*(2*k-1)/n)
    b2 := (n, k) -> 2*sin(Pi*(2*k+1)/n)
    w1 := (n, k) -> b1(n, k)+b2(n, k)
    w2 := (n, k) -> sqrt((1/2)*n*sin(2*Pi/n))
    h1 := (n, k) -> cos(Pi*(2*k-1)/n)-cos(Pi*(2*k+1)/n)
    h2 := (n, k) -> w1(n, k)*h1(n, k)/w2(n, k)
    a := (n, k) -> floor(w2(n, k)/w1(n, k))*h2(n, k)/h1(n, k)
    kp := (n, k) -> 3*signum(w1(n, k)-w2(n, k))+3+((1/2)*signum(w2(n, k)-w1(n, k))+1/2)* (3*floor(w2(n, k)/w1(n, k))+9/2+(1/2)*signum(w2(n, k)-floor(w2(n, k)/w1(n, k))*w1(n, k)-(1/2-(1/2)*a(n, k))*w1(n, k)-a(n, k)*b2(n, k)))
    P := n-> 9/2+sum(kp(n, k), k = 1 .. floor((1/4)*n)-1)+1.5*signum((1/4)*n-floor((1/4)*n)-.25)
    [seq([2*i, P(2*i)], i = 3 .. 100)]

Extensions

Entry revised by Pamela Pierce (PPierce(AT)wooster.edu), John Ramsay (JRamsay(AT)wooster.edu), Jeffrey Willert (jawiller(AT)ncsu.edu), Hannah Roberts (HRoberts12(AT)wooster.edu), Nancy Tinoza (NTinoza12(AT)wooster.edu) and Wenyuan Wu (wwu11(AT)wooster.edu), Sep 03 2009. The revisions are based on a dissection method found in 2009.
Given that the value of a(3) changed from 6 to 5 at the latest revision, one should not have too much confidence that these entries are minimal. - N. J. A. Sloane, Sep 05 2009
Showing 1-6 of 6 results.