A238363 Coefficients for the commutator for the logarithm of the derivative operator [log(D),x^n D^n]=d[(xD)!/(xD-n)!]/d(xD) expanded in the operators :xD:^k.
1, -1, 2, 2, -3, 3, -6, 8, -6, 4, 24, -30, 20, -10, 5, -120, 144, -90, 40, -15, 6, 720, -840, 504, -210, 70, -21, 7, -5040, 5760, -3360, 1344, -420, 112, -28, 8, 40320, -45360, 25920, -10080, 3024, -756, 168, -36, 9, -362880, 403200, -226800, 86400, -25200, 6048, -1260, 240, -45, 10
Offset: 1
Examples
The first few row polynomials are p(1,x)= 1 p(2,x)= -1 + 2x p(3,x)= 2 - 3x + 3x^2 p(4,x)= -6 + 8x - 6x^2 + 4x^3 p(5,x)= 24 -30x +20x^2 -10x^3 + 5x^4 ........... For n=3: z!/(z-3)!=z^3-3z^2+2z=St1(3,z) with derivative 3z^2-6z+2, and 3·St2(2,x)-6·St2(1,x)+2=3(x^2+x)-6x+2=3x^2-3x+2=p(3,x). To see the relation to the operator formalism, note that (xD)^k=St2(k,:xD:) and (xD)!/(xD-k)!=[St2(·,:xD:)]!/[St2(·,:xD:)-k]!= :xD:^k. The triangle a(n,k) begins: n\k 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 1: 1 2: -1 2 3: 2 -3 3 4: -6 8 -6 4 5: 24 -30 20 -10 5 6: -120 144 -90 40 -15 6 7: 720 -840 504 -210 70 -21 7 8: -5040 5760 -3360 1344 -420 112 -28 8 9: 40320 -45360 25920 -10080 3024 -756 168 -36 9 10: -362880 403200 -226800 86400 -25200 6048 -1260 240 -45 10 ... formatted by _Wolfdieter Lang_, Mar 01 2014 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Links
- Tom Copeland, Riemann zeta function at positive integers and an Appell sequence of polynomials, 2012.
- Tom Copeland, Goin' with the Flow: Logarithm of the Derivative Operator, 2014.
- Tom Copeland, Bernoulli, Blissard, and Lie meet Stirling and the simplices: State number operators and normal ordering, 2014.
- Tom Copeland, Compositional inverse operators and Sheffer sequences, 2016.
Programs
-
Mathematica
a[n_, k_] := (-1)^(n-k-1)*n!/((n-k)*k!); Table[a[n, k], {n, 1, 10}, {k, 0, n-1}] // Flatten (* Jean-François Alcover, Jul 09 2015 *)
Formula
a(n,k) = (-1)^(n-k-1)*n!/((n-k)*k!) for k=0 to (n-1).
E.g.f.: log(1+t)*exp(x*t).
E.g.f.for unsigned array: -log(1-t)*exp(x*t).
The lowering op. for the row polynomials is L=d/dx, i.e., L p(n,x) = n*p(n-1,x).
An e.g.f. for an unsigned related version is -log(1+t)*exp(x*t)/t= exp(t*s(·,x)) with s(n,x)=(-1)^n * p(n+1,-x)/(n+1). Let L=d/dx and R= x-(1/((1-D)log(1-D))+1/D),then R s(n,x)= s(n+1,x) and L s(n,x)= n*s(n-1,x), defining a special Sheffer sequence of polynomials, an Appell sequence. So, R (-1)^(n-1) p(n,-x)/n = (-1)^n p(n+1,-x)/(n+1).
From Tom Copeland, Apr 17 2014: (Start)
Dividing each diagonal by its first element (-1)^(n-1)*(n-1)! yields the reverse of A104712.
Multiply each n-th diagonal of the Pascal lower triangular matrix by x^n and designate the result as A007318(x) = P(x). Then with dP = A132440, M = padded A238363 = A238385-I, I = identity matrix, and (B(.,x))^n = B(n,x) = the n-th Bell polynomial Bell(n,x) of A008277,
A) P(x)= exp(x*dP) = exp[x*(e^M-I)] = exp[M*B(.,x)] = (I+dP)^B(.,x), and
B) P(:xD:)=exp(dP:xD:)=exp[(e^M-I):xD:]=exp[M*B(.,:xD:)]=exp[M*xD]=
(1+dP)^(xD) with action P(:xD:)g(x) = exp(dP:xD:)g(x) = g[(I+dP)*x].
C) P(x)^m = P(m*x). P(2x) = A038207(x) = exp[M*B(.,2x)], face vectors of n-D hypercubes. (End)
From Tom Copeland, Apr 26 2014: (Start)
B) = [St1]*[dP]*[St1]^(-1)
C) = [St2]^(-1)*[dP]*[St2]
D) = [St2]^(-1)*[dP]*[St1]^(-1),
E) P(x) = [St2]*exp(x*M)*[St1] = [St2]*(I + dP)^x*[St1].
F) exp(x*M) = [St1]*P(x)*[St2] = (I + dP)^x,
where (I + dP)^x = sum(k>=0, C(x,k)*dP^k).
Let the row vector Rv=(c0 c1 c2 c3 ...) and the column vector Cv(x)=(1 x x^2 x^3 ...)^Transpose. Form the power series V(x)= Rv * Cv(x) and W(y) := V(x.) evaluated umbrally with (x.)^n = x_n = (y)_n = y!/(y-n)!. Then
G) U(:xD:) = dV(:xD:)/d(xD) = dW(xD)/d(xD) evaluated with (xD)^n = Bell(n,:xD:),
H) U(x) = dV(x.)/dy := dW(y)/dy evaluated with y^n=y_n=Bell(n,x), and
The Bernoulli polynomials Ber_n(x) are related to the polynomials q_n(x) = p(n+1,x) / (n+1) with the e.g.f. [log(1+t)/t] e^(xt) (cf. s_n (x) above) as Ber_n(x) = St2_n[q.(St1.(x))], umbrally, or [St2]*[q]*[St1], in matrix form. Since q_n(x) is an Appell sequence of polynomials, q_n(x) = [log(1+D_x)/D_x]x^n. - Tom Copeland, Nov 06 2016
Extensions
Pincherle formalism added by Tom Copeland, Feb 27 2014
Comments