cp's OEIS Frontend

This is a front-end for the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, made by Christian Perfect. The idea is to provide OEIS entries in non-ancient HTML, and then to think about how they're presented visually. The source code is on GitHub.

Showing 1-2 of 2 results.

A319037 a(n) is the length of the longest run of consecutive triangular numbers with n divisors.

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 1, 0, 4, 0, 2, 0, 3, 1, 1, 0, 3, 0, 1, 1, 6, 0, 2, 0, 3, 0, 1, 0, 7, 0, 1, 1, 3, 0, 2, 0, 13, 0, 1, 0, 6, 0, 1, 0, 6, 0, 2, 0, 3, 1, 1, 0
Offset: 1

Views

Author

Jon E. Schoenfield, Dec 08 2018

Keywords

Comments

Every number with an odd number of divisors is a square, and no two consecutive positive triangular numbers are squares, so for all odd n, a(n) = 1 if a triangular number with n divisors exists, 0 otherwise.
T(190254647) = 18098415447674628 is the smallest triangular number that begins a run of 9 consecutive triangular numbers with 48 divisors. Does a longer run exist? - Jon E. Schoenfield, May 29 2022
From Jon E. Schoenfield, Mar 17 2023: (Start)
9 <= a(48) <= 16.
a(48) < 17 because a run of 17 consecutive triangular numbers with 48 divisors each would require (see the Example section at A319038) a run of 9 consecutive odd numbers 2k+1, 2k+3, ..., 2k+17 with tau2 divisors each and a run of 9 consecutive integers -- either k, k+1, ..., k+8 or k+1, k+2, ..., k+9 -- with tau1 divisors each, with tau1*tau2 = 48. There exists no run of 8 or more consecutive integers with tau1 < 12 divisors each, nor is there any run of 9 or more consecutive odd numbers with tau1 <= 4 divisors each (tau1 = 4 is impossible because among any 9 or more consecutive odd numbers there is at least one that is a multiple of 9, and the only such multiple with exactly 4 divisors is 3^3 = 27).
Similarly, it can be shown that if a(48) = 16, there must exist a run of 8 consecutive odd numbers 2k+1, 2k+3, ..., 2k+15 with tau2 = 4 divisors each and a run of 9 consecutive integers k, k+1, ..., k+8 with tau1 = 12 divisors each. It seems to me that such solutions should exist (although it could be very difficult to find any). E.g., the 9 consecutive integers could be numbers of the forms 2*13^2*p, 3*5^2*q, 2^5*r, s^2*t*u, 2*3^2*v, 7^2*w*x, 2^2*5*y, 3*z^2*a, and 2*b^2*c, respectively, and the 8 consecutive odd numbers could be of the forms 17*d, 7*e, 3*f, 5*g, 11*h, 3*i, 13*j, and 19*m, respectively, where each letter (other than k) represents a distinct prime. (End)

Examples

			a(1) = 1 because there is only one triangular number T(k) = k*(k+1)/2 with 1 divisor: T(1) = 1.
a(2) = 1 because there is only one triangular number with 2 divisors: T(2) = 3, the only prime triangular number.
a(3) = 0 because there is no triangular number with 3 divisors.
a(4) = 4 because {6, 10, 15, 21} is the longest run of consecutive triangular numbers with 4 divisors.
a(16) = 6 because T(692993)..T(692998) is a run of 6 consecutive triangular numbers with 16 divisors, and no longer run of such triangular numbers exists.
a(24) = 7 because T(1081135121474335700644)..T(1081135121474335700650) is a run of 7 consecutive triangular numbers with 24 divisors, and no longer run of such triangular numbers exists. - _Jinyuan Wang_, Aug 23 2020
T(1081135121474335700644) is the smallest triangular number that begins a run of 7 consecutive triangular numbers with 24 divisors. - _Jon E. Schoenfield_, May 29 2022
		

Crossrefs

Extensions

a(21)-a(24) from Jinyuan Wang, Aug 23 2020
a(25)-a(47) from Jon E. Schoenfield, Feb 04 2021

A319038 Table read by rows: T(n,k) is the smallest triangular number that begins a run of exactly k consecutive triangular numbers with n divisors, or 0 if no such run exists.

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 3, 55, 0, 0, 6, 28, 153, 105, 66, 406, 36, 496, 276, 3916, 11175, 8128, 1631432881, 120, 1770, 17205, 106030, 457062495, 240119995521, 300, 2556, 528, 327645, 12607731, 38009927549623740385753, 630, 1540, 29646, 181503, 3181503, 18542914232391, 584426575442663305723408463937454358857690
Offset: 1

Views

Author

Jon E. Schoenfield, Dec 08 2018

Keywords

Comments

The number of terms in the n-th row is A319037(n). Row n has no terms here iff A081978(n) = 0 (i.e., there is no triangular number with n divisors; this is the case for n = 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, ...).

Examples

			Row 4 has A319037(4) = 4 terms: 55, 0, 0, 6. T(4,4) = 6 because 6 is the smallest triangular number that begins a run of exactly 4 consecutive triangular numbers with 4 divisors; T(4,1) = 55 because T(10)=55 is the smallest triangular number whose predecessor T(9)=45 and successor T(11)=66 each have a number of divisors other than 4 (so 55 constitutes a "run" of only a single triangular number); and T(4,2) = T(4,3) = 0 because no triangular numbers with 4 divisors are in runs of exactly 2 or 3 successive triangular number with 4 divisors. (In other words, every triangular number with 4 divisors that is not in the run {6, 10, 15, 21} is isolated.)
Every triangular number can be represented as the product of an integer m and one of the two odd integers 2m-1 and 2m+1; graphically, if we represent the integers m and the odd integers 2m-1 and 2m+1 in two rows, with each m connected to 2m-1 and 2m+1 by diagonal lines as
.
    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9  10  11  12  13  14  15
   /\  /\  /\  /\  /\  /\  /\  /\  /\  /\  /\  /\  /\  /\  /\
  /  \/  \/  \/  \/  \/  \/  \/  \/  \/  \/  \/  \/  \/  \/
  1   3   5   7   9  11  13  15  17  19  21  23  25  27  29
.
then each triangular number is the product of two connected factors f1 and f2 as follows:
.
f1:      1         2         3         4         5         6
        /\        /\        /\        /\        /\        /\
       /  \      /  \      /  \      /  \      /  \      /  \
      1    3    6   10   15   21   28   36   45   55   66
     /      \  /      \  /      \  /      \  /      \  /
    /        \/        \/        \/        \/        \/
f2: 1         3         5         7         9        11
.
Writing tau() as the number-of-divisors function, since gcd(m, 2m-1) = gcd(m, 2m+1) = 1, we have tau(f1*f2) = tau(f1)*tau(f2) for each triangular number f1*f2. Showing the number of divisors of each factor f1 and f2 and each triangular number in parentheses, we have
.
f1:       1           2           3           4           5
         (1)         (2)         (2)         (3)         (2)
         /\          /\          /\          /\          /\
        /  \        /  \        /  \        /  \        /  \
       1    3      6   10     15   21     28   36     45
     (1)    (2)  (4)    (4)  (4)    (4)  (6)    (9)  (6)
     /        \  /        \  /        \  /        \  /
    /          \/          \/          \/          \/
f2: 1           3           5           7           9
   (1)         (2)         (2)         (2)         (3)
.
A run of consecutive triangular numbers T with a constant tau(T) thus requires a constant tau(f1)=tau1 and a constant tau(f2)=tau2 for all f1 and all f2 that appear as factors in the run. Thus, e.g., a run of 3 consecutive triangular numbers with 12 divisors requires 3 successive connections, hence 4 factors consisting of 2 consecutive integers f1, with tau=tau1, overlapping in the above graphic representation with 2 consecutive odd numbers f2, with tau=tau2, such that tau1*tau2=12. The divisors of 12 are {1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12}. Neither tau1 nor tau2 can be 1 (only one integer, 1, has tau=1), so neither can be 12/1=12. Neither tau1 nor tau2 can be 3 (every number with 3 divisors is the square of a prime, and no two consecutive integers are squares of primes, nor are any two consecutive odd numbers), so neither can be 12/3=4. Thus tau1 and tau2 must be 2 and 6, in some order. Since tau=2 only for primes, and the only two consecutive integers f1 that are prime are 2 and 3, and the f2 to which they would both connect is 5 (which does not have 6 divisors), tau1 cannot be 2; thus tau1=6, so tau2=2. The two consecutive odd numbers f2 are twin primes, and are not (3,5), so their average is a multiple of 6, so the integer f1 connected to them, being half of that average, is a multiple of 3, and since it has 6 divisors, it must be 3^5 = 243 or a number of the form 3^2*p or 3*p^2 where p is a prime other than 3. As it turns out, the smallest such f1 yielding a run of three consecutive triangular numbers with 12 divisors is 3*5^2 = 75:
.
     74                75                76
(2*37: tau=4)    (3*5^2: tau=6)   (2^2*19: tau=6)
      .                /\                /.
       .              /  \              /  .
        .            /    \            /    .
         .       11175=   11325=   11476=    .
       (tau=8)   75*149   75*151   76*151  (tau=36)
           .     tau=12   tau=12   tau=12      .
            .    /            \    /            .
             .  /              \  /              .
              ./                \/                .
             149               151               153
        (prime: tau=2)    (prime: tau=2)   (3^2*17: tau=6)
.
This first run of exactly three consecutive triangular numbers with 12 divisors begins with 11175, so T(12,3) = 11175.
The table begins as follows:
.
  row  terms
  ---  --------------------------------------------------
    1  1;
    2  3;
    3  (no terms)
    4  55, 0, 0, 6;
    5  (no terms)
    6  28, 153;
    7  (no terms)
    8  105, 66, 406;
    9  36;
   10  496;
   11  (no terms)
   12  276, 3916, 11175;
   13  (no terms)
   14  8128;
   15  1631432881;
   16  120, 1770, 17205, 106030, 457062495, 240119995521;
   17  (no terms)
   18  300, 2556;
   19  (no terms)
   20  528, 327645, 12607731;
   21  (no terms)
   22  38009927549623740385753;
   23  (no terms)
   24  630, 1540, 29646, 181503, 3181503, 18542914232391, 584426575442663305723408463937454358857690
		

Crossrefs

Extensions

T(22,1), T(24,1)-T(24,7) added to Data, and Comments updated, by Jon E. Schoenfield, Jan 29 2021 [T(24,7) from Jinyuan Wang's Example section entry at A319037]
Showing 1-2 of 2 results.