cp's OEIS Frontend

This is a front-end for the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, made by Christian Perfect. The idea is to provide OEIS entries in non-ancient HTML, and then to think about how they're presented visually. The source code is on GitHub.

Showing 1-4 of 4 results.

A090252 The Two-Up sequence: a(n) is the least positive number not already used that is coprime to the previous floor(n/2) terms.

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 2, 3, 5, 4, 7, 9, 11, 13, 17, 8, 19, 23, 25, 21, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 16, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 55, 79, 27, 49, 83, 89, 97, 101, 103, 107, 109, 113, 127, 131, 137, 139, 149, 151, 26, 157, 163, 167, 173, 179, 181, 191, 193, 197, 199, 211, 85, 121, 223, 227, 57, 229
Offset: 1

Views

Author

Amarnath Murthy, Nov 27 2003

Keywords

Comments

a(n) is coprime to the next n terms. - David Wasserman, Oct 24 2005
All values up to a(1000000) are either prime powers or semiprimes; this suggests the sequence is unlikely to be a permutation of the integers.
It appears that a(n) is even iff n = 3*2^k-1 for some k (A083356). - N. J. A. Sloane, Nov 01 2014
The even terms in the present sequence are listed in A354255.
We have a(1) = 1 and a(2) = 2. At step k >= 2, the sequence is extended by adding two terms: a(2*k-1) = smallest unused number which is relatively prime to a(k), a(k+1), ..., a(2*k-2), and a(2*k) = smallest unused number which is relatively prime to a(k), a(k+1), ..., a(2*k-1). So at step k=2 we add a(3)=3, a(4)=5; at step k=3 we add a(5)=4, a(6)=7; and so on. - N. J. A. Sloane, May 21 2022
Comments from N. J. A. Sloane, May 23 2022: (Start)
Conjecture 1. A090252 is a subsequence of A354144 (prime powers and semiprimes).
Conjecture 2. The terms of A354144 that are missing from A090252 are 6, 10, 14, 15, 22, 33, 34, 35, 38, 39, 46, 51, 58, 62, 65, 69, 74, 77, 82, 86, 87, 91, 93, 94, 95, 106, 111, 115, 118, 119, 122, 123, 129, 133, 134, 141, 142, 143, 145, 146, 155, 158, 166, 177, 178, 183, 185, 187, 194, 201, 202, 203, 209, 213, 214, 215, 218, 219, 221, ...
But since there is no proof that any one of these numbers is really missing, this list cannot yet have an entry in the OEIS.
Let S_p = list of indices of terms in A090252 that are divisible by the prime p.
Conjecture 3. For a prime p, there are constants v_1, v_2, ..., v_K and c such that
S_p = { v_1, v_2, ..., v_k, lambda*2^i - 1, i >= c}.
For example, from Michael S. Branicky's 10000-term b-file, it appears that:
S_2 = { 3*2^k-1, k >= 0 } cf. A083329
S_3 = { 2^k-1, k >= 2 } cf. A000225
S_5 = { 4 then 15*2^k-1 k >= 0 } cf. A196305
S_7 = { 6, 15, then 33*2^k-1, k >= 0 }
S_11 = { 8, 29, then 61*2^k-1, k >= 0 }
S_13 = { 9, 47, 97*2^n-1, n >= 0 }
S_17 = { 10, 59, 121*2^n-1, n >= 0 }
S_19 = { 12, 63, 129*2^n-1, n >= 0 }
S_23 = { 13, 65, 133*2^n-1, n >= 0 }
S_29 = { 16, 121, 245*2^n-1, n >= 0 }
S_31 = { 17, 131, 265*2^n-1, n >= 0 }
The initial primes p and the corresponding values of lambda are:
p: 2 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 23 29 31
lambda:..3...1..15..33...61...97..121..129..133..245..265
(This sequence of lambdas does not seem to have any simpler explanation, is not in the OEIS, and cannot be since the terms shown are all conjectural.)
Conjecture 2 is a consequence of Conjecture 3. For example, 6 does not appear in A090252, since the sets S_2 and S_3 are disjoint.
Also 10 does not appear, since S_2 and S_5 are disjoint.
In fact 2*p for 3 <= p <= 11 does not appear, but 26 = 2*13 does appear since S_2 and S_13 have 47 in common.
Assuming the numbers that appear to be missing (see Conjecture 2) really are missing, the numbers that take a record number of steps to appear are 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 16, 26, 32, 64, 128, 206, 256, 478, 512, 933, ..., and the indices where they appear are 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 11, 23, 47, 95, 191, 383, 767, 1535, 3071, 6143, 8191, .... These two sequences are not yet in the OEIS, and cannot be added since the terms are all conjectural.
(End)
From N. J. A. Sloane, Jun 06 2022 (Start)
Theorem: (a) a(n) <= prime(n-1) for all n >= 2 (cf. A354154).
(b) A stronger upper bound is the following. Let c(n) = A354166(n) denote the number of nonprime terms among a(1) .. a(n). Note c(1)=1. Then a(n) <= prime(n-c(n)) for n <> 7 and 14.
It appears that a(n) = prime(n-c(n)) for almost all n. That is, this is the equation to the line in the graph that contains most of the terms.
For example, a(34886) = 408710 (see the b-file) = prime(34886 - A354166(34886)) = prime(34886 - 374) = prime(34512) = 408710.
Another example: Consider Russ Cox's table of the first N = 5764982 terms. We see that a(5764982) = 99999989 = prime(5761455) = prime(N - 3527) which agrees with c(N) = 3527 (from the first Russ Cox link).
(End)
If we consider the May 23 2022 comment, note the conjectured indices show near complete overlap with terms of A081026: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 11, 23, 47, 95, 191, 383, 767, 1535, 3071, 6143, 8191. - Bill McEachen, Aug 09 2024

Crossrefs

See A247665 for the case when the numbers are required to be at least 2. A353730 is another version.
For a squarefree analog, see A354790, A354791, A354792.

Programs

Extensions

More terms from David Wasserman, Oct 24 2005

A354159 Terms 2*p (p prime) in A090252, divided by 2, in order of appearance.

Original entry on oeis.org

2, 13, 103, 239, 499, 1567, 3257, 6971, 14447, 30259, 63317, 130699
Offset: 1

Views

Author

N. J. A. Sloane, May 30 2022

Keywords

Comments

By definition, 2*a(n) is a term in A354255.
Conjecture: the indices of the terms 2*p in A090252 are terms in A083329.

Examples

			The indices in A090252 of the initial terms 2*p, the terms 2*p themselves, and the primes p are [5, 4, 2], [47, 26, 13], [767, 206, 103], [3071, 478, 239].
		

Crossrefs

Extensions

a(6)-a(8) from Michael S. Branicky, Jun 04 2022 using A354255
a(9)-a(11) from Hugo van der Sanden, Jun 14 2022
a(12) from Jinyuan Wang, Jul 15 2022

A354146 Even numbers in A353730 in order of appearance.

Original entry on oeis.org

2, 4, 8, 16, 26, 32, 64, 128, 206, 256, 454, 446, 512, 1024, 2048, 3142
Offset: 1

Views

Author

N. J. A. Sloane, May 21 2022

Keywords

Comments

A090252(1535) = 256 and A090252(3071) = 478 are also even terms in A090252; the latter breaks the correspondence with this sequence. - Michael S. Branicky, May 21 2022

Crossrefs

Extensions

Deleted an incorrect comment. - N. J. A. Sloane, May 25 2022

A354150 Index of 2^n in A090252, or -1 if 2^n does not appear.

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 2, 5, 11, 23, 95, 191, 383, 1535, 6143, 24575, 49151, 196607, 786431, 3145727, 12582911, 50331647, 201326591, 805306367
Offset: 0

Views

Author

N. J. A. Sloane, May 26 2022

Keywords

Comments

It is conjectured (see A090252) that the indices of even terms in A090252 are {3*2^i-1, i >= 0} (A083329), so the positive terms of the present sequence should be a subsequence of A083329.
For n = 1,...,18, the terms are 3*2^k - 1 for k = 0,1,2,3,5,6,7,9,11,13,14,16,18,20,22,24,26,28. Will the formula a(n) = 3*2^(2*n-8)-1 hold for all n >= 11? This appears to be yet another example of the influence of A029744 on A090252 and A354691.- N. J. A. Sloane, Aug 24 2022

Crossrefs

Cf. A090252, A083329, A354148, A354149, A354255 (even terms in A090252).
See also A029744, A354169.

Extensions

a(10) from Michael S. Branicky, May 27 2022
a(11)-a(14) from Michael S. Branicky, Jun 01 2022 using gzipped b-file at A090252
a(15)-a(18) from Jinyuan Wang, Jul 15 2022
Showing 1-4 of 4 results.