cp's OEIS Frontend

This is a front-end for the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, made by Christian Perfect. The idea is to provide OEIS entries in non-ancient HTML, and then to think about how they're presented visually. The source code is on GitHub.

Previous Showing 61-63 of 63 results.

A214813 Maximal contact number of a subset of n balls from the face-centered cubic lattice.

Original entry on oeis.org

0, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21
Offset: 1

Views

Author

N. J. A. Sloane, Jul 31 2012

Keywords

Comments

If S is an arrangement of non-overlapping balls of radius 1, the contact number of S is the number of pairs of balls that just touch each other.
a(13) >= 36 (take one ball and its 12 neighbors), so this is different from A008486.
If b(n) denotes the maximal contact number of any arrangement of n balls then it is conjectured that a(n) = b(n) for n <= 9. It is also known that b(10)>=25, b(11)>=29, b(12)>=33 and of course b(13) >= a(13) >= 36. [Bezdek 2012]
Note that Figure 1e of Bezdek's arxiv:1601.00145 shows at n=5 a sphere packing with 9 contacts on the hexagonal close package (!), not on the cubic close package (which equals the f.c.c.). [In Figure 1e there is one sphere that touches from above a set of 3 spheres in a middle layer right above the bottom sphere; so this needs the ABABA... layer structures of the h.c.p, and cannot be done with the ABCABC... layer structure of the f.c.c.] So Figure 1e is not demonstrating a(5)=9. The correct value for the f.c.c is apparently a(5)=8 (where two structures with 8 contacts exist.) - R. J. Mathar, Mar 13 2018

Crossrefs

A242941 a(n) is the number of convex uniform tessellations in dimension n.

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 11, 28, 143
Offset: 1

Views

Author

Felix Fröhlich, May 27 2014

Keywords

Comments

Terms for n > 4 have not been determined so far. Alfredo Andreini in 1905 gave a value of 25 for a(3), later found to be incorrect. The value 28 for a(3) was given by Norman Johnson in 1991 and later in 1994 independently by Branko Grünbaum. The value for a(4) was given by George Olshevsky in 2006.
Deza and Shtogrin (2000) agree that the value of a(3) is 28, although the authors do not provide a proof. - Felix Fröhlich, Nov 29 2014
From Felix Fröhlich, Feb 03 2019: (Start)
The 11 convex uniform tilings are all illustrated in Kepler, 1619. For an argument that exactly 11 such tilings exist, see Grünbaum, Shephard, 1977.
In dimension 2, the definition of "uniform polytope" usually seems to be equivalent to the regular polygons in order to exclude polygons that alternate two different edge-lengths. Applying this principle retroactively to dimension 1 (as done, as I assume, by Coxeter, see Coxeter, 1973, p. 129) yields a(1) = 1. (End)

References

  • H. S. M. Coxeter, Regular Polytopes, Third Edition, Dover Publications, 1973, ISBN 9780486614809.
  • B. Grünbaum, Uniform tilings of 3-space, Geombinatorics, Vol. 4, No. 2 (1994), 49-56.
  • N. W. Johnson, Uniform Polytopes, [To appear, cf. Weiss, Stehle, 2017].

Crossrefs

Cf. A068599.
List of coordination sequences for the 11 uniform 2D tilings: A008458(the planar net 3.3.3.3.3.3), A008486 (6^3), A008574 (4.4.4.4 and 3.4.6.4), A008576 (4.8.8), A008579 (3.6.3.6), A008706(3.3.3.4.4), A072154 (4.6.12), A219529 (3.3.4.3.4), A250120(3.3.3.3.6), A250122 (3.12.12).
List of coordination sequences for the 28 uniform 3D tilings: cab: A299266, A299267; crs: A299268, A299269; fcu: A005901, A005902; fee: A299259, A299265; flu-e: A299272, A299273; fst: A299258, A299264; hal: A299274, A299275; hcp: A007899, A007202; hex: A005897, A005898; kag: A299256, A299262; lta: A008137, A299276; pcu: A005899, A001845; pcu-i: A299277, A299278; reo: A299279, A299280; reo-e: A299281, A299282; rho: A008137, A299276; sod: A005893, A005894; sve: A299255, A299261; svh: A299283, A299284; svj: A299254, A299260; svk: A010001, A063489; tca: A299285, A299286; tcd: A299287, A299288; tfs: A005899, A001845; tsi: A299289, A299290; ttw: A299257, A299263; ubt: A299291, A299292; bnn: A007899, A007202. See the Proserpio link in A299266 for overview.

Extensions

Edited by N. J. A. Sloane, Feb 15 2018
Edited by Felix Fröhlich, Feb 03-10 2019

A053402 Running distances (in meters) in Olympic athletics.

Original entry on oeis.org

100, 200, 400, 800, 1500, 5000, 10000, 42195
Offset: 1

Views

Author

Jean Fontaine (jfontain(AT)odyssee.net), Jan 07 2000

Keywords

Comments

Hurdle races not included.
The marathon distance was only standardized to 42195 meters in 1924; before then, distances varied from about 40000 to 40750. This sequence does not include hurdles, steeplechase, relays, medleys, team races, walks, or cross country. It also excludes the 60 meter of the 1900 and 1904 Olympics and the women's 3000 meter in 1984, 1988, and 1992; additionally, the women's running events did not include all of these distances until 1996. - Charles R Greathouse IV, Jan 06 2016

Extensions

a(8) and offset corrected by Charles R Greathouse IV, Jan 06 2016
Previous Showing 61-63 of 63 results.