A001198 Zarankiewicz's problem k_3(n).
9, 14, 21, 27, 34, 43, 50, 61, 70, 81, 93, 106, 121, 129
Offset: 3
Examples
From _M. F. Hasler_, Sep 28 2021: (Start) For n = 3 it is clearly necessary and sufficient that there be 3 X 3 = 9 ones in the n X n matrix in order to have an all-ones 3 X 3 submatrix. For n = 4 there may be at most 2 zeros in the 4 X 4 matrix in order to be guaranteed to have a 3 X 3 submatrix with all '1's, whence a(4) = 16 - 2 = 14: If 3 zeros are placed on a diagonal, it is no more possible to find a 3 X 3 all-ones submatrix, but if there are at most 2 zeros, one always has such a submatrix, as one can see from the following two diagrams: 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 no 3 X 3 Here one can delete, e.g., -> 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 <- all-ones row 1 and column 2 to get 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 submatrix an all-ones 3 X 3 matrix. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 (End)
References
- L. Comtet, Advanced Combinatorics, Reidel, 1974, p. 291.
- R. K. Guy, A problem of Zarankiewicz, in P. Erdős and G. Katona, editors, Theory of Graphs (Proceedings of the Colloquium, Tihany, Hungary), Academic Press, NY, 1968, pp. 119-150.
- N. J. A. Sloane, A Handbook of Integer Sequences, Academic Press, 1973 (includes this sequence).
- N. J. A. Sloane and Simon Plouffe, The Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, Academic Press, 1995 (includes this sequence).
Links
- R. K. Guy, A problem of Zarankiewicz, Research Paper No. 12, Dept. of Math., Univ. Calgary, Jan. 1967. [Annotated and scanned copy, with permission]
- R. K. Guy, A many-facetted problem of Zarankiewicz, Lect. Notes Math. 110 (1969), 129-148.
- Jeremy Tan, An attack on Zarankiewicz's problem through SAT solving, arXiv:2203.02283 [math.CO], 2022.
Crossrefs
Formula
Extensions
a(11)-a(13) from Andrew Howroyd, Dec 26 2021
a(14)-a(15) computed from A350237 by Max Alekseyev, Apr 01 2022
a(16) from Jeremy Tan, Oct 02 2022
Comments