A385755 -id:A385755 - cp's OEIS frontend

A385756 Complement of A385755.

20, 21, 25, 27, 28, 33, 39, 40, 42, 44, 45, 49, 50, 51, 52, 54, 55, 56, 57, 60, 63, 65, 66, 68, 69, 75, 76, 77, 78, 80, 81, 84, 85, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 93, 95, 98, 99, 100, 102, 104, 105, 108, 110, 111, 112, 114, 115, 116, 117, 119, 120, 121, 123, 124, 125, 126, 129

Offset: 1

Hugo Pfoertner, Jul 09 2025

nonn

Michael De Vlieger, Table of n, a(n) for n = 1..10000
Michael De Vlieger, Mathematica code.

Cf. A001222, A001414, A385755, A385811.

A385811 Numbers k such that there exists a partition of the sum of prime factors of k (cf. A001414) into bigomega(k) (cf. A001222) prime parts where the product of parts is more than k.

Original entry on oeis.org

20, 21, 28, 33, 39, 40, 42, 44, 51, 52, 56, 57, 60, 63, 65, 66, 68, 69, 76, 78, 80, 84, 85, 87, 88, 92, 93, 95, 99, 100, 102, 104, 105, 111, 112, 114, 115, 116, 117, 119, 120, 123, 124, 126, 129, 130, 132, 133, 136, 138, 140, 141, 145, 147, 148, 152, 153, 155

Offset: 1

Gordon Hamilton, Jul 09 2025

nonn

As a temporary name, let's call these numbers "inefficient".
A number n is inefficient if there is a larger number N which has the same number of prime factors (counted with multiplicity) and the sum of the prime factors of n and N are the same.
The density of terms in the positive integers is 1.
This is a good sequence for students exploring prime factorization for the first time. When teaching elementary school students, refrain from divulging the rules upfront. Instead, seek high engagement by delivering a series of epic communal fails. I ask the students to give me an inefficient number, knowing they know nothing about what that means. When they supply "15" I'll show that 3*5 = 15 and 3+5 = 8 and complain that they've failed. When they do stumble upon a number like "28" then I use the opportunity to explain more of the rules.
Some numbers are noticeably absent from this list:
 - primes,
 - powers of primes,
 - numbers whose prime factors include only two consecutive prime numbers,
 - double any of the above three.

			60 is inefficient because its prime factors are 2,2,3,5. These factors add to 12. 81 is larger than 60 and also has its four prime factors adding to 12. 60 is therefore inefficient.
63 is inefficient because its prime factors are 3,3,7. These factors add to 13. 75 is larger than 63 and also has its three prime factors (3,5,5) adding to 13. 63 is therefore inefficient.

Cf. A001222, A001414, A385755, A385756.

More terms from Alois P. Heinz, Jul 09 2025

cp's OEIS Frontend

A385756 Complement of A385755.

Views

Author

Keywords

Links

Crossrefs

A385811 Numbers k such that there exists a partition of the sum of prime factors of k (cf. A001414) into bigomega(k) (cf. A001222) prime parts where the product of parts is more than k.

Views

Author

Keywords

Comments

Examples

Crossrefs

Extensions