cp's OEIS Frontend

This is a front-end for the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, made by Christian Perfect. The idea is to provide OEIS entries in non-ancient HTML, and then to think about how they're presented visually. The source code is on GitHub.

Previous Showing 21-24 of 24 results.

A215645 Depth for {+1,-1} maximal determinant matrices: minimal depth for which a proper submatrix is also a maximal determinant matrix.

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 8, 1, 7, 10, 10, 10
Offset: 1

Views

Author

Keywords

Comments

The complementary depth m(A) of a maximal determinant {+1,-1} matrix of order n is the maximum m < n such that a maximal determinant matrix of order m occurs as a proper submatrix of A, or 0 if n = 1. The depth d(A) of A is d(A) := n - m(A). The depth d(n) is the minimum of d(A) over all maximal determinant matrices A of order n.
We calculated the first 21 terms of the sequence by an exhaustive computation of minors of known maximal determinant matrices as of August 2012.

Examples

			For n = 11 the depth is 3 because there is a maximal determinant matrix of order 11 that has a maximal determinant submatrix of order 8 = 11-3, but no larger proper maximal determinant submatrices. Note that only one of the three Hadamard equivalence classes of maximal determinant matrices of order 11 gives depth 3; the others give depth 4, but we take the minimum.
		

Crossrefs

A276410 Largest determinant of a (real) {0,1}-matrix of order n subject to the restriction that the corresponding 0,1 simplex is acute.

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 9, 32, 56, 96
Offset: 0

Views

Author

N. J. A. Sloane, Sep 17 2016

Keywords

Crossrefs

See A003432 for the usual version of this problem.

A301370 Maximum determinant of an n X n (0,1)-matrix that has exactly 2*n ones.

Original entry on oeis.org

0, 2, 2, 3, 4, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, 16, 18, 24, 32, 36, 48, 64
Offset: 2

Views

Author

Hugo Pfoertner, Mar 20 2018

Keywords

Comments

A proved upper bound is abs(a(n)) <= 6^(n/6), provided by Bruhn and Rautenbach. A conjectured sharper bound is abs(a(n)) <= 2^(n/3), provided by the same authors. For n=3*k, the bound is achieved by diagonally concatenating blocks ((1 1 0)(0 1 1)(1 0 1)).
The sharper bound is proved by Araujo, Balogh, and Wang in their article. See link. - Hugo Pfoertner, Nov 04 2020

Examples

			a(8) = 6 because no (0,1)-matrix with 2*8 ones with a greater determinant exists than
  ( 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 )
  ( 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 )
  ( 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 )
  ( 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 )
  ( 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 )
  ( 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 )
  ( 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 )
  ( 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 )
		

Crossrefs

A352348 Maximum determinant of n X n matrix composed of {-1, 0, 1} with pairwise orthogonal rows.

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 2, 2, 16, 16, 125, 128, 4096, 4096, 59049, 59049, 2985984, 2985984, 62748517
Offset: 1

Views

Author

Max Alekseyev, Mar 12 2022

Keywords

Comments

a(n) >= a(m)*a(n-m) for any m < n.
a(n) <= A003433(n), a bound achieved if the orthogonality requirement is dropped.
If there exists an order n Hadamard matrix, then a(n) = A003433(n) = n^(n/2).
For n == 2 (mod 4), if there exists an order n conference matrix (cf. A000952), then a(n) = (n-1)^(n/2). In particular, a(18) = 118587876497.

Crossrefs

Extensions

a(11)-a(14) from Max Alekseyev, May 20 2023
Previous Showing 21-24 of 24 results.