cp's OEIS Frontend

This is a front-end for the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, made by Christian Perfect. The idea is to provide OEIS entries in non-ancient HTML, and then to think about how they're presented visually. The source code is on GitHub.

A013632 Difference between n and the next prime greater than n.

Original entry on oeis.org

2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 4, 3, 2, 1, 2, 1, 4, 3, 2, 1, 2, 1, 4, 3, 2, 1, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 2, 1, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 4, 3, 2, 1, 2, 1, 4, 3, 2, 1, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 2, 1, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 4, 3, 2, 1, 2, 1, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 4, 3, 2, 1, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 4, 3, 2, 1, 2, 1, 4, 3
Offset: 0

Views

Author

Keywords

Comments

Alternatively, a(n) is the smallest positive k such that n + k is prime. - N. J. A. Sloane, Nov 18 2015
Except for a(0) and a(1), a(n) is the least k such that gcd(n!, n + k) = 1. - Robert G. Wilson v, Nov 05 2010
This sequence uses the "strictly larger" variant A151800 of the nextprime function, rather than A007918. Therefore all terms are positive and a(n) = 1 if and only if n + 1 is a prime. - M. F. Hasler, Sep 09 2015
For n > 0, a(n) and n are of opposite parity. Also, by Bertrand's postulate (actually a theorem), for n > 1, a(n) < n. - Zak Seidov, Dec 27 2018

Examples

			a(30) = 1 because 31 is the next prime greater than 30 and 31 - 30 = 1.
a(31) = 6 because 37 is the next prime greater than 31 and 37 - 31 = 6.
		

Crossrefs

Programs

  • Magma
    [NextPrime(n) - n: n in [0..100]]; // Vincenzo Librandi, Dec 27 2018
    
  • Maple
    [ seq(nextprime(i)-i,i=0..100) ];
  • Mathematica
    Array[NextPrime[#] - # &, 105, 0] (* Robert G. Wilson v, Nov 05 2010 *)
  • PARI
    a(n) = nextprime(n+1) - n; \\ Michel Marcus, Mar 04 2015
    
  • SageMath
    [next_prime(n) - n for n in range(121)] # G. C. Greubel, May 12 2023

Formula

a(n) = Prime(1 + PrimePi(n)) - n = A084695(n, 1) (for n > 0). - G. C. Greubel, May 12 2023

Extensions

Incorrect comment removed by Charles R Greathouse IV, Mar 18 2010
More terms from Robert G. Wilson v, Nov 05 2010