cp's OEIS Frontend

This is a front-end for the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, made by Christian Perfect. The idea is to provide OEIS entries in non-ancient HTML, and then to think about how they're presented visually. The source code is on GitHub.

A035050 a(n) is the smallest k such that k*2^n + 1 is prime.

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 3, 3, 2, 1, 15, 12, 6, 3, 5, 4, 2, 1, 6, 3, 11, 7, 11, 25, 20, 10, 5, 7, 15, 12, 6, 3, 35, 18, 9, 12, 6, 3, 15, 10, 5, 6, 3, 9, 9, 15, 35, 19, 27, 15, 14, 7, 14, 7, 20, 10, 5, 27, 29, 54, 27, 31, 36, 18, 9, 12, 6, 3, 9, 31, 23, 39, 39, 40, 20, 10, 5, 58, 29, 15, 36, 18, 9, 13
Offset: 0

Views

Author

Keywords

Comments

From Ulrich Krug (leuchtfeuer37(AT)gmx.de), Jun 05 2010: (Start)
If a(i) = 2 * m then a(i+1) = m.
Proof: (I) a(i) = 2*m, 2*m * 2^i + 1 = m*2^(i+1) + 1 prime, so a(i+1) <= m;
(II) if a(i+1) = m-d for an integer d > 0, (m-d) * 2^(i+1) + 1 = (2*m-2*d) * 2^i + 1 prime;
(2m-2d) < 2m contradiction to a(i) = 2 * m, d = 0.
(End)
Conjecture: for n > 0, a(n) = k < 2^n, so k*2^n + 1 is a Proth prime A080076. - Thomas Ordowski, Apr 13 2019

Examples

			a(3)=2 because 1*2^3 + 1 = 9 is composite, 2*2^3 + 1 = 17 is prime.
a(99)=219 because 2^99k + 1 is not prime for k=1,2,...,218. The first term which is not a composite number of this arithmetic progression is 2^99*219 + 1.
		

Crossrefs

Analogous case is A034693. Special subscripts (n's for a(n)=1) are the exponents of known Fermat primes: A000215. See also Fermat numbers A000051.

Programs

  • Magma
    sol:=[];m:=1; for n in [0..82] do k:=0; while not IsPrime(k*2^n+1) do k:=k+1; end while; sol[m]:=k; m:=m+1; end for; sol; // Marius A. Burtea, Jun 05 2019
  • Mathematica
    a = {}; Do[k = 0; While[ ! PrimeQ[k 2^n + 1], k++ ]; AppendTo[a, k], {n, 0, 100}]; a (* Artur Jasinski *)
    Table[Module[{k=1,n2=2^n},While[!PrimeQ[k*n2+1],k++];k],{n,0,90}] (* Harvey P. Dale, May 25 2024 *)
  • PARI
    a(n) = {my(k = 1); while (! isprime(2^n*k+1), k++); k;}
    

Formula

a(n) << 19^n by Xylouris' improvement to Linnik's theorem. - Charles R Greathouse IV, Dec 10 2013