A093375 Array T(m,n) read by ascending antidiagonals: T(m,n) = m*binomial(n+m-2, n-1) for m, n >= 1.
1, 2, 1, 3, 4, 1, 4, 9, 6, 1, 5, 16, 18, 8, 1, 6, 25, 40, 30, 10, 1, 7, 36, 75, 80, 45, 12, 1, 8, 49, 126, 175, 140, 63, 14, 1, 9, 64, 196, 336, 350, 224, 84, 16, 1, 10, 81, 288, 588, 756, 630, 336, 108, 18, 1, 11, 100, 405, 960, 1470, 1512, 1050, 480, 135, 20, 1, 12
Offset: 1
Examples
Array T(m,n) (with rows m >= 1 and columns n >= 1) begins as follows: 1 1 1 1 1 1 ... 2 4 6 8 10 12 ... 3 9 18 30 45 63 ... 4 16 40 80 140 224 ... 5 25 75 175 350 630 ... ... Triangle S(n,k) = T(n-k+1, k+1) begins .n\k.|....0....1....2....3....4....5....6 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ..0..|....1 ..1..|....2....1 ..2..|....3....4....1 ..3..|....4....9....6....1 ..4..|....5...16...18....8....1 ..5..|....6...25...40...30...10....1 ..6..|....7...36...75...80...45...12....1 ...
Links
- Muniru A Asiru, Antidiagonals, n=1..100 flattened
- Yasemin Alp and E. Gokcen Kocer, Exponential Almost-Riordan Arrays, Results Math 79, 173 (2024). See page 7.
- Sergey Kitaev and Toufik Mansour, Partially ordered generalized patterns and k-ary words, arXiv:math/0210023 [math.CO], 2002.
- Wikipedia, Sheffer sequence.
Crossrefs
Programs
-
GAP
nmax:=14;; T:=List([1..nmax],n->List([1..nmax],k->k*Binomial(n+k-2,n-1)));; b:=List([2..nmax],n->OrderedPartitions(n,2));; a:=Flat(List([1..Length(b)],i->List([1..Length(b[i])],j->T[b[i][j][1]][b[i][j][2]]))); # Muniru A Asiru, Aug 07 2018
-
Mathematica
nmax = 10; T = Transpose[CoefficientList[# + O[z]^(nmax+1), z]& /@ CoefficientList[(1 - x z)/(1 - z - x z)^2 + O[x]^(nmax+1), x]]; row[n_] := T[[n+1, 1 ;; n+1]]; Table[row[n], {n, 0, nmax}] // Flatten (* Jean-François Alcover, Aug 07 2018 *)
-
Sage
# uses[riordan_array from A256893] riordan_array((1+x)*exp(x), x, 8, exp=true) # Peter Luschny, Nov 02 2019
Formula
Triangle = P*M, the binomial transform of the infinite bidiagonal matrix M with (1,1,1,...) in the main diagonal and (1,2,3,...) in the subdiagonal, and zeros elsewhere. P = Pascal's triangle as an infinite lower triangular matrix. - Gary W. Adamson, Nov 05 2006
From Peter Bala, Sep 20 2012: (Start)
E.g.f. for triangle: (1 + z)*exp((1 + x)*z) = 1 + (2 + x)*z + (3 + 4*x + x^2)*z^2/2! + ....
O.g.f. for triangle: (1 - x*z)/(1 - z - x*z)^2 = 1 + (2 + x)*z + (3 + 4*x + x^2)*z^2 + ....
The n-th row polynomial R(n,x) of the triangle equals (1+x)^n + n*(1+x)^(n-1) for n >= 0 and satisfies d/dx(R(n,x)) = n*R(n-1,x), as well as R(n,x+y) = Sum_{k = 0..n} binomial(n,k)*R(k,x)*y^(n-k). The row polynomials are a Sheffer sequence of Appell type.
Matrix inverse of the triangle is a signed version of A073107. (End)
From Tom Copeland, Oct 20 2015: (Start)
With offset 0 and D = d/dx, the raising operator for the signed row polynomials P(n,x) is RP = x - d{log[e^D/(1-D)]}/dD = x - 1 - 1/(1-D) = x - 2 - D - D^2 + ..., i.e., RP P(n,x) = P(n+1,x).
The e.g.f. for the signed array is (1-t) * e^(-t) * e^(x*t).
From the Appell formalism, the row polynomials PI(n,x) of A073107 are the umbral inverse of this entry's row polynomials; that is, P(n,PI(.,x)) = x^n = PI(n,P(.,x)) under umbral composition. (End)
From Petros Hadjicostas, Nov 01 2019: (Start)
As a triangle, we let S(n,k) = T(n-k+1, k+1) = (n-k+1)*binomial(n, k) for n >= 0 and 0 <= k <= n. See the example below.
As stated above by Peter Bala, Sum_{n,k >= 0} S(n,k)*z^n*x^k = (1 - x*z)/(1 - z -x*z)^2.
Also, Sum_{n, k >= 0} S(n,k)*z^n*x^k/n! = (1+z)*exp((1+x)*z).
As he also states, the n-th row polynomial is R(n,x) = Sum_{k = 0..n} S(n, k)*x^k = (1 + x)^n + n*(1 + x)^(n-1).
If we define the signed triangle S*(n,k) = (-1)^(n+k) * S(n,k) = (-1)^(n+k) * T(n-k+1, k+1), as Tom Copeland states, Sum_{n,k >= 0} S^*(n,k)*t^n*x^k/n! = (1-t)*exp((1-x)*(-t)) = (1-t) * e^(-t) * e^(x*t).
Apparently, S*(n,k) = A103283(n,k).
As he says above, the signed n-th row polynomial is P(n,x) = (-1)^n*R(n,-x) = (x - 1)^n - n*(x - 1)^(n-1).
According to Gary W. Adamson, P(n,x) is "the monic characteristic polynomial of the n X n matrix with 2's on the diagonal and 1's elsewhere." (End)
Comments