cp's OEIS Frontend

This is a front-end for the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, made by Christian Perfect. The idea is to provide OEIS entries in non-ancient HTML, and then to think about how they're presented visually. The source code is on GitHub.

Showing 1-5 of 5 results.

A151996 Erroneous version of A100200.

Original entry on oeis.org

1431, 1731, 1831, 2432, 2732, 2832, 3171, 3181, 3272, 3282, 11511, 31531, 31631, 32532, 32632, 33151, 33161, 33252, 33262, 114311, 117311, 118311, 124312, 127312, 128312, 214321, 217321, 218321, 224322, 227322, 228322
Offset: 1

Views

Author

Keywords

A101248 Decimal Goedelization of contingent WFFs (well-formed formulas) from propositional calculus, in Richard C. Schroeppel's metatheory of A101273. Truth value depends on truth value of variables, but is neither always true (theorem) nor always false (antitheorem).

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 2, 11, 12, 21, 22, 31, 32, 111, 112, 121, 122, 141, 142, 152, 161, 162, 172, 182, 211, 212, 221, 222, 241, 242, 251, 261, 262, 271, 281, 311, 312, 321, 322, 331, 332, 910, 920, 1111, 1112, 1121, 1122, 1141, 1142, 1151, 1152, 1161, 1162, 1171, 1172, 1181, 1182
Offset: 1

Views

Author

Jonathan Vos Post, Jan 23 2005

Keywords

Comments

Blocks of 1's and 2s are variables: A = 1, B = 2, C = 11, D = 12, E = 21, ... Not (also written -) = 3; And = 4; Xor = 5; Or = 6; Implies = 7; Equiv = 8; Left Parenthesis = 9; Right Parenthesis = 0. Operator binding strength is in numerical order, Not > And > ... > Equiv. The non-associative "Implies" is evaluated from Left to Right; A->B->C = is interpreted (A->B)->C.
Redundant parentheses are permitted, so long as they are balanced and centered on a valid variable or sentential formula and not on the null character. Besides A101273 (theorems = tautologies), A100200 (antitheorems = always false WFFs) there can also be the subsequence of theorems that can be proved within the more restricted intuitionistic logic; this sequence of well-formed formulas whose truth value is contingent on the truth values of their variables; and many others.
As with A101273, I conjecture that a power law approximates the number of integers in this sequence, where the number with N digits is approximately N to the power of some real number D. The union of A101273, A100200 and this sequence is the set of all WFFs in Richard C. Schroeppel's metatheory of A101273.

Examples

			1 A
2 B
11 C
12 D
21 E
22 F
31 -A
32 -B
111 G
112 H
121 I
122 J
141 A^A
142 A^B
152 A xor B
161 A V A
162 A V B
172 A->B
182 A=B
211 K
212 L
221 M
222 N
241 B^A
242 B^B
251 B xor A
261 B V A
262 B V B
271 B->A
281 B=A
311 -C
312 -D
321 -E
322 -F
331 --A
332 --B
910 (A)
912 (B)
1111 O
1112 P
1121 Q
1122 R
1141 C^A
1142 C^B
1151 C xor A
1152 C xor B
1161 C V A
1162 C V B
1171 C->A
1172 C->B
1181 C=A
1182 C=B
		

References

  • Goedel, K. On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems. New York: Dover, 1992.
  • Hofstadter, D. R. Goedel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. New York: Vintage Books, p. 17, 1989.
  • Kleene, S. C. Introduction to Metamathematics. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, p. 39, 1964.

Crossrefs

Extensions

Corrected sequence and examples Charles R Greathouse IV, Oct 06 2009

A101273 Theorems from propositional calculus, translated into decimal digits.

Original entry on oeis.org

171, 181, 272, 282, 1531, 1631, 2532, 2632, 3151, 3161, 3252, 3262, 11711, 11811, 12712, 12812, 14171, 14181, 14271, 14272, 15171, 15172, 16171, 16181, 17141, 17161, 17162, 17261, 17331, 17910, 18141, 18161, 18331, 18910, 21721, 21821, 22722, 22822, 24171
Offset: 1

Views

Author

Richard C. Schroeppel, Dec 19 2004

Keywords

Comments

Blocks of 1s and 2s are variables: A = 1, B = 2, C = 11, D = 12, E = 21, ... Not = 3; And = 4; Xor = 5; Or = 6; Implies = 7; Equiv = 8; Left Parenthesis = 9; Right Parenthesis = 0.
Operator binding strength is in numerical order, Not > And > ... > Equiv.
The non-associative "Implies" is evaluated from Left to Right; A->B->C = is interpreted (A->B)->C. Redundant parentheses are permitted.
This is a decimal Goedelization of theorems from a particular axiomatization of propositional calculus. This should be linked to the subsequences of theorems and antitheorems. - Jonathan Vos Post, Dec 19 2004 [This comment is referring to A100200 and A101248. - N. J. A. Sloane, May 19 2020]
Comment from Charles R Greathouse IV, May 17 2020: (Start)
Each positive integer represents a string of one or more symbols, as described above. Some represent well-formed formulas. Of those, some are theorems (A101273) while others are antitheorems (A100200) with the remaining wffs in A101248. The first few theorems are
171, A -> A
181, A <-> A
272, B -> B
282, B <-> B
1531, A XOR ~A,
with 1 = A, 7 = ->, etc. (End)
In short: any well-formed formula (wff) can be mapped to an integer. The sequence lists those integers that correspond to wff's that are theorems. - N. J. A. Sloane, May 19 2020

Examples

			Example: 17162 is the theorem A->AvB.
		

References

  • M. Davis, Computability and Unsolvability. New York: Dover 1982.
  • D. R. Hofstadter, Goedel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. New York: Vintage Books, p. 18, 1989.
  • S. C. Kleene, Mathematical Logic. New York: Dover, 2002.

Crossrefs

See A100200 and A101248 for further information.

Formula

It appears that the n-th term is very roughly n^c, for some c>1.

Extensions

Corrected and edited by Charles R Greathouse IV, Oct 06 2009

A140861 Decimal Goedelization of Heyting's 11 axioms for intuitionistic propositional logic.

Original entry on oeis.org

1791410, 91420792410, 91720799141109241100, 991720492711007917, 2791720, 91491720072, 1791620, 91620792610, 99171104927110079916207110, 31791720, 99172049173200731
Offset: 1

Views

Author

Jonathan Vos Post, Jul 18 2008

Keywords

Comments

Axioms of Heyting (1930) as explained in Mark van Atten (2008). The same notation as in A101273, including: Blocks of 1's and 2s are variables: A = 1, B = 2, C = 11, D = 12, E = 21, ... Not (also written -) = 3; And = 4; Xor = 5; Or = 6; Implies = 7; Equiv = 8; Left Parenthesis = 9; Right Parenthesis = 0. Operator binding strength is in numerical order, Not > And > ... > Equiv. The hard thing, given errors in my related earlier submissions within Richard C. Schroeppel's metatheory, is to list in numerical order the theorems that can be proved from these 11 axioms.

Examples

			axiom 1: A->(A^A).
axiom 2: (A^B)->(B^A).
axiom 3: (A->B)->((A^C)->(B^C)).
axiom 4: ((A->B)^(B->C))->(A->C).
axiom 5: B->(A->B).
axiom 6: (A^(A->B))->B.
axiom 7: A->(AvB).
axiom 8: (AvB)->(BvA).
axiom 9: ((A->C)^(B->C))->((AvB)->C).
axiom 10: -A->(A->B).
axiom 11: ((A->B)^(A->-B))->-A.
		

References

  • Heyting, A., 1930, Die formalen Regeln der intuitionistischen Logik I, Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 42-56. English translation in Mancosu, 1998, pp.311-327.

Crossrefs

A166746 Count of propositional theorems up to 10^n in Richard C. Schroeppel's Goedelization of A101273.

Original entry on oeis.org

0, 0, 4, 12, 72, 262, 1396, 6126, 31186, 144606, 713078, 3384796
Offset: 1

Views

Author

Keywords

Comments

Jonathan Vos Post conjectures that a(n) is approximately D^n for some real number D.

Examples

			The first five theorems in A101273 are 171 ("A->A"), 181 ("A=A"), 272 ("B->B"), 282 ("B=B"), and 1531 ("A xor -A"), so a(1) = 0, a(2) = 0, and a(3) = 4.
		

Crossrefs

Showing 1-5 of 5 results.