cp's OEIS Frontend

This is a front-end for the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, made by Christian Perfect. The idea is to provide OEIS entries in non-ancient HTML, and then to think about how they're presented visually. The source code is on GitHub.

Showing 1-8 of 8 results.

A326866 Number of connectedness systems on n vertices.

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 2, 8, 96, 6720, 8130432, 1196099819520
Offset: 0

Views

Author

Gus Wiseman, Jul 29 2019

Keywords

Comments

We define a connectedness system (investigated by Vim van Dam in 2002) to be a set of finite nonempty sets (edges) that is closed under taking the union of two overlapping edges.

Examples

			The a(0) = 1 through a(2) = 8 connectedness systems:
  {}  {}     {}
      {{1}}  {{1}}
             {{2}}
             {{1,2}}
             {{1},{2}}
             {{1},{1,2}}
             {{2},{1,2}}
             {{1},{2},{1,2}}
		

Crossrefs

The case without singletons is A072446.
The unlabeled case is A326867.
The connected case is A326868.
Binomial transform of A326870 (the covering case).
The BII-numbers of these set-systems are A326872.

Programs

  • Mathematica
    Table[Length[Select[Subsets[Subsets[Range[n],{1,n}]],SubsetQ[#,Union@@@Select[Tuples[#,2],Intersection@@#!={}&]]&]],{n,0,3}]

Formula

a(n) = 2^n * A072446(n).

Extensions

a(6) corrected by Christian Sievers, Oct 26 2023

A072447 Number of connectedness systems on n vertices that contain all singletons and the set of all the vertices.

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 1, 8, 378, 252000, 18687534984
Offset: 1

Views

Author

Wim van Dam (vandam(AT)cs.berkeley.edu), Jun 18 2002

Keywords

Comments

Previous name was: a(1) = 1; for n > 1, a(n) = number of families of subsets of {1, ..., n} that contain both the universe and the empty set, are closed under union of nondisjoint sets, and contain no singletons.
A connectedness system is (as below) a set of (finite) nonempty sets that is closed under union of nondisjoint sets.
The old definition was: "Number of subsets S of the power set P{1,2,...,n} such that: {1}, {2},..., {n} are all elements of S; {1,2,...n} is an element of S; if X and Y are elements of S and X and Y have a nonempty intersection, then the union of X and Y is an element of S."
Comments on the old definition from Gus Wiseman, Aug 01 2019: (Start)
If this sequence were defined similarly to A326877, we would have a(1) = 0.
We define a connectedness system to be a set of finite nonempty sets (edges) that is closed under taking the union of any two overlapping edges. It is connected if it is empty or contains an edge with all the vertices. a(n) is the number of connected connectedness systems on n vertices without singletons. For example, the a(3) = 8 connected connectedness systems without singletons are:
{{1,2,3}}
{{1,2},{1,2,3}}
{{1,3},{1,2,3}}
{{2,3},{1,2,3}}
{{1,2},{1,3},{1,2,3}}
{{1,2},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
{{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
{{1,2},{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
(End)
Conjecture concerning the original definition: a(n) is also the number of families of subsets of {1, ..., n} that contain both the universe and the empty set, are closed under intersection and contain no sets of cardinality n-1. - Tian Vlasic, Nov 04 2022. [This was false, as pointed out by Christian Sievers, Oct 20 2023. It is easy to see that for n>1, a(n) is also the number of families of subsets of {1, ..., n} that contain both the universe and the empty set, are closed under union of nondisjoint sets, and contain no singletons; whereas by duality, the sequence suggested in the conjecture is also the number of those families that are also closed under arbitrary union. For details see the Sievers link. - N. J. A. Sloane, Oct 21 2023]

Examples

			a(3) = 8 because of the 8 sets: {{1}, {2}, {3}, {1, 2, 3}}; {{1}, {2}, {3}, {1, 2}, {1, 2, 3}}; {{1}, {2}, {3}, {1, 3}, {1, 2, 3}}; {{1}, {2}, {3}, {2, 3}, {1, 2, 3}}; {{1}, {2}, {3}, {1, 2}, {1, 3}, {1, 2, 3}}; {{1}, {2}, {3}, {1, 2}, {2, 3}, {1, 2, 3}}; {{1}, {2}, {3}, {1, 3}, {2, 3}, {1, 2, 3}}; {{1}, {2}, {3}, {1, 2}, {1, 3}, {2, 3}, {1, 2, 3}}.
		

Crossrefs

The unlabeled case is A072445.
The non-connected case is A072446.
The case with singletons is A326868.
The covering version is A326877.

Programs

  • Mathematica
    Table[Length[Select[Subsets[Subsets[Range[n],{2,n}]],(n==0||MemberQ[#,Range[n]])&&SubsetQ[#,Union@@@Select[Tuples[#,2],Intersection@@#!={}&]]&]],{n,0,4}] (* returns a(1) = 0 similar to A326877. - Gus Wiseman, Aug 01 2019 *)

Formula

a(n > 1) = A326868(n)/2^n. - Gus Wiseman, Aug 01 2019

Extensions

Edited by N. J. A. Sloane, Oct 21 2023 (a(6) corrected by Christian Sievers, Oct 20 2023)
Edited by Christian Sievers, Oct 26 2023

A326870 Number of connectedness systems covering n vertices.

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 1, 5, 77, 6377, 8097721, 1196051135917
Offset: 0

Views

Author

Gus Wiseman, Jul 29 2019

Keywords

Comments

We define a connectedness system (investigated by Vim van Dam in 2002) to be a set of finite nonempty sets (edges) that is closed under taking the union of any two overlapping edges. It is covering if every vertex belongs to some edge.

Examples

			The a(2) = 5 connectedness systems:
  {{1,2}}
  {{1},{2}}
  {{1},{1,2}}
  {{2},{1,2}}
  {{1},{2},{1,2}}
		

Crossrefs

Inverse binomial transform of A326866 (the non-covering case).
Exponential transform of A326868 (the connected case).
The unlabeled case is A326871.
The BII-numbers of these set-systems are A326872.
The case without singletons is A326877.

Programs

  • Mathematica
    Table[Length[Select[Subsets[Subsets[Range[n],{1,n}]],Union@@#==Range[n]&&SubsetQ[#,Union@@@Select[Tuples[#,2],Intersection@@#!={}&]]&]],{n,0,4}]

Extensions

a(6) corrected by Christian Sievers, Oct 28 2023

A326869 Number of unlabeled connected connectedness systems on n vertices.

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 1, 3, 20, 406, 79964, 1689032658
Offset: 0

Views

Author

Gus Wiseman, Jul 29 2019

Keywords

Comments

We define a connectedness system (investigated by Vim van Dam in 2002) to be a set of finite nonempty sets (edges) that is closed under taking the union of any two overlapping edges. It is connected if it contains an edge with all the vertices.

Examples

			Non-isomorphic representatives of the a(3) = 20 connected connectedness systems:
  {{1,2,3}}
  {{3},{1,2,3}}
  {{2,3},{1,2,3}}
  {{2},{3},{1,2,3}}
  {{1},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
  {{3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
  {{1},{2},{3},{1,2,3}}
  {{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
  {{1},{3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
  {{2},{3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
  {{2},{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
  {{3},{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
  {{1,2},{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
  {{1},{2},{3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
  {{1},{2},{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
  {{2},{3},{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
  {{3},{1,2},{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
  {{1},{2},{3},{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
  {{2},{3},{1,2},{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
  {{1},{2},{3},{1,2},{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
		

Crossrefs

The case without singletons is A072445.
Connected set-systems are A092918.
The not necessarily connected case is A326867.
The labeled case is A326868.
Euler transform is A326871 (the covering case).

Extensions

a(5) from Andrew Howroyd, Aug 16 2019
a(6) from Andrew Howroyd, Oct 28 2023

A326871 Number of unlabeled connectedness systems covering n vertices.

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 1, 4, 24, 436, 80460, 1689114556
Offset: 0

Views

Author

Gus Wiseman, Jul 29 2019

Keywords

Comments

We define a connectedness system (investigated by Vim van Dam in 2002) to be a set of finite nonempty sets (edges) that is closed under taking the union of any two overlapping edges. It is covering if every vertex belongs to some edge.

Examples

			Non-isomorphic representatives of the a(0) = 1 through a(3) = 24 connectedness systems:
  {}  {{1}}  {{1,2}}          {{1,2,3}}
             {{1},{2}}        {{1},{2,3}}
             {{2},{1,2}}      {{1},{2},{3}}
             {{1},{2},{1,2}}  {{3},{1,2,3}}
                              {{1},{3},{2,3}}
                              {{2,3},{1,2,3}}
                              {{2},{3},{1,2,3}}
                              {{1},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
                              {{1},{2},{3},{2,3}}
                              {{3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
                              {{1},{2},{3},{1,2,3}}
                              {{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
                              {{1},{3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
                              {{2},{3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
                              {{2},{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
                              {{3},{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
                              {{1,2},{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
                              {{1},{2},{3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
                              {{1},{2},{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
                              {{2},{3},{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
                              {{3},{1,2},{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
                              {{1},{2},{3},{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
                              {{2},{3},{1,2},{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
                              {{1},{2},{3},{1,2},{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
		

Crossrefs

The non-covering case without singletons is A072444.
The case without singletons is A326899.
First differences of A326867 (the non-covering case).
Euler transform of A326869 (the connected case).
The labeled case is A326870.

Extensions

a(5) from Andrew Howroyd, Aug 10 2019
a(6) from Andrew Howroyd, Oct 28 2023

A326877 Number of connectedness systems covering n vertices without singletons.

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 0, 1, 8, 381, 252080, 18687541309
Offset: 0

Views

Author

Gus Wiseman, Jul 30 2019

Keywords

Comments

We define a connectedness system (investigated by Vim van Dam in 2002) to be a set of finite nonempty sets (edges) that is closed under taking the union of any two overlapping edges. It is covering if every vertex belongs to some edge.

Examples

			The a(3) = 8 covering connectedness systems without singletons:
  {{1,2,3}}
  {{1,2},{1,2,3}}
  {{1,3},{1,2,3}}
  {{2,3},{1,2,3}}
  {{1,2},{1,3},{1,2,3}}
  {{1,2},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
  {{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
  {{1,2},{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
		

Crossrefs

Inverse binomial transform of A072446 (the non-covering case).
Exponential transform of A072447 if we assume A072447(1) = 0 (the connected case).
The case with singletons is A326870.
The BII-numbers of these set-systems are A326873.

Programs

  • Mathematica
    Table[Length[Select[Subsets[Subsets[Range[n],{2,n}]],Union@@#==Range[n]&&SubsetQ[#,Union@@@Select[Tuples[#,2],Intersection@@#!={}&]]&]],{n,0,4}]

Extensions

a(6) corrected by Christian Sievers, Oct 28 2023

A326879 BII-numbers of connected connectedness systems.

Original entry on oeis.org

0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 16, 17, 24, 25, 32, 34, 40, 42, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112
Offset: 1

Views

Author

Gus Wiseman, Jul 29 2019

Keywords

Comments

We define a connectedness system (investigated by Vim van Dam in 2002) to be a set of finite nonempty sets (edges) that is closed under taking the union of any two overlapping edges. It is connected if it contains an edge containing all the vertices.
A binary index of n is any position of a 1 in its reversed binary expansion. The binary indices of n are row n of A048793. We define the set-system with BII-number n to be obtained by taking the binary indices of each binary index of n. Every finite set of finite nonempty sets has a different BII-number. For example, 18 has reversed binary expansion (0,1,0,0,1), and since the binary indices of 2 and 5 are {2} and {1,3} respectively, the BII-number of {{2},{1,3}} is 18. Elements of a set-system are sometimes called edges.
The enumeration of connected connectedness systems by number of vertices is given by A326868.

Examples

			The sequence of all connected connectedness systems together with their BII-numbers begins:
   0: {}
   1: {{1}}
   2: {{2}}
   4: {{1,2}}
   5: {{1},{1,2}}
   6: {{2},{1,2}}
   7: {{1},{2},{1,2}}
   8: {{3}}
  16: {{1,3}}
  17: {{1},{1,3}}
  24: {{3},{1,3}}
  25: {{1},{3},{1,3}}
  32: {{2,3}}
  34: {{2},{2,3}}
  40: {{3},{2,3}}
  42: {{2},{3},{2,3}}
  64: {{1,2,3}}
  65: {{1},{1,2,3}}
  66: {{2},{1,2,3}}
  67: {{1},{2},{1,2,3}}
  68: {{1,2},{1,2,3}}
		

Crossrefs

Connected connectedness systems are counted by A326868, with unlabeled version A326869.
Connected connectedness systems without singletons are counted by A072447.
The not necessarily connected case is A326872.

Programs

  • Mathematica
    bpe[n_]:=Join@@Position[Reverse[IntegerDigits[n,2]],1];
    connsysQ[eds_]:=SubsetQ[eds,Union@@@Select[Tuples[eds,2],Intersection@@#!={}&]];
    Select[Range[0,100],#==0||MemberQ[bpe/@bpe[#],Union@@bpe/@bpe[#]]&&connsysQ[bpe/@bpe[#]]&]

A326899 Number of unlabeled connectedness systems covering n vertices without singletons.

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 0, 1, 4, 41, 3048, 26894637
Offset: 0

Views

Author

Gus Wiseman, Aug 02 2019

Keywords

Comments

We define a connectedness system (investigated by Vim van Dam in 2002) to be a set of finite nonempty sets (edges) that is closed under taking the union of any two overlapping edges.

Examples

			Non-isomorphic representatives of the a(3) = 4 connectedness systems:
  {{1,2,3}}
  {{2,3},{1,2,3}}
  {{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
  {{1,2},{1,3},{2,3},{1,2,3}}
		

Crossrefs

The case with singletons is A326871.
First differences of A072444 (the non-covering case).
Euler transform of A072445 (the connected case).
The labeled version is A326877.

Extensions

a(6) corrected by Andrew Howroyd, Oct 28 2023
Showing 1-8 of 8 results.