cp's OEIS Frontend

This is a front-end for the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, made by Christian Perfect. The idea is to provide OEIS entries in non-ancient HTML, and then to think about how they're presented visually. The source code is on GitHub.

Previous Showing 11-20 of 27 results. Next

A005342 a(n) = solution to the postage stamp problem with n denominations and 7 stamps.

Original entry on oeis.org

7, 23, 69, 165, 345, 664, 1137, 1911
Offset: 1

Views

Author

Keywords

Comments

Fred Lunnon [W. F. Lunnon] defines "solution" to be the smallest value not obtainable by the best set of stamps. The solutions given are one lower than this, that is, the sequence gives the largest number obtainable without a break using the best set of stamps.

References

  • R. K. Guy, Unsolved Problems in Number Theory, C12.
  • N. J. A. Sloane and Simon Plouffe, The Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, Academic Press, 1995 (includes this sequence).

Crossrefs

Extensions

Entry improved by comments from John Seldon (johnseldon(AT)onetel.com), Sep 15 2004
a(8) from Challis and Robinson by Robert Price, Jul 19 2013

A005343 a(n) = solution to the postage stamp problem with n denominations and 8 stamps.

Original entry on oeis.org

8, 28, 89, 234, 512, 1045, 2001, 3485
Offset: 1

Views

Author

Keywords

Comments

Fred Lunnon [W. F. Lunnon] defines "solution" to be the smallest value not obtainable by the best set of stamps. The solutions given are one lower than this, that is, the sequence gives the largest number obtainable without a break using the best set of stamps.

References

  • R. K. Guy, Unsolved Problems in Number Theory, C12.
  • N. J. A. Sloane and Simon Plouffe, The Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, Academic Press, 1995 (includes this sequence).

Crossrefs

Extensions

Entry improved by comments from John Seldon (johnseldon(AT)onetel.com), Sep 15 2004
a(8) from Challis and Robinson. John P Robinson (john-robinson(AT)uiowa.edu), Feb 18 2010

A005344 a(n) = solution to the postage stamp problem with n denominations and 9 stamps.

Original entry on oeis.org

9, 34, 112, 326, 797, 1617, 3191
Offset: 1

Views

Author

Keywords

Comments

Fred Lunnon [W. F. Lunnon] defines "solution" to be the smallest value not obtainable by the best set of stamps. The solutions given are one lower than this, that is, the sequence gives the largest number obtainable without a break using the best set of stamps.

References

  • R. K. Guy, Unsolved Problems in Number Theory, C12.
  • N. J. A. Sloane and Simon Plouffe, The Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, Academic Press, 1995 (includes this sequence).

Crossrefs

Extensions

Entry improved by comments from John Seldon (johnseldon(AT)onetel.com), Sep 15 2004
a(7) from Challis and Robinson by Robert Price, Jul 19 2013

A053346 a(n) = solution to the postage stamp problem with 7 denominations and n stamps.

Original entry on oeis.org

7, 26, 70, 162, 336, 638, 1137, 2001, 3191, 5047, 7820, 11568, 17178
Offset: 1

Views

Author

N. J. A. Sloane, Jun 20 2003

Keywords

Comments

Fred Lunnon [W. F. Lunnon] defines "solution" to be the smallest value not obtainable by the best set of stamps. The solutions given are one lower than this, that is, the sequence gives the largest number obtainable without a break using the best set of stamps.

References

  • R. K. Guy, Unsolved Problems in Number Theory, C12.

Crossrefs

Extensions

a(9) from Challis by R. J. Mathar, Apr 01 2006
Entry improved by comments from John Seldon (johnseldon(AT)onetel.com), Sep 15 2004
a(10)-a(13) from Challis and Robinson by Robert Price, Jul 19 2013

A053348 a(n) = solution to the postage stamp problem with 8 denominations and n stamps.

Original entry on oeis.org

8, 32, 93, 228, 524, 1007, 1911, 3485
Offset: 1

Views

Author

N. J. A. Sloane, Jun 20 2003

Keywords

Comments

Fred Lunnon [W. F. Lunnon] defines "solution" to be the smallest value not obtainable by the best set of stamps. The solutions given are one lower than this, that is, the sequence gives the largest number obtainable without a break using the best set of stamps.

References

  • R. K. Guy, Unsolved Problems in Number Theory, C12.

Crossrefs

Extensions

a(6) from Challis by R. J. Mathar, Apr 01 2006
Entry improved by comments from John Seldon (johnseldon(AT)onetel.com), Sep 15 2004
a(7)-a(8) from Challis and Robinson by Robert Price, Jul 19 2013

A075060 a(n) = solution to the postage stamp problem with n denominations and 10 stamps.

Original entry on oeis.org

10, 40, 146, 427, 1055, 2510, 5047
Offset: 1

Views

Author

N. J. A. Sloane, Jun 20 2003

Keywords

Comments

Fred Lunnon [W. F. Lunnon] defines "solution" to be the smallest value not obtainable by the best set of stamps. The solutions given are one lower than this, that is, the sequence gives the largest number obtainable without a break using the best set of stamps.

References

  • R. K. Guy, Unsolved Problems in Number Theory, C12.

Crossrefs

Extensions

Entry improved by comments from John Seldon (johnseldon(AT)onetel.com), Sep 15 2004
a(7) from Challis and Robinson by John P Robinson (john-robinson(AT)uiowa.edu), Feb 18 2010

A084192 Array read by antidiagonals: T(n,k) = solution to postage stamp problem with n stamps and k denominations (n >= 1, k >= 1).

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 3, 4, 8, 7, 4, 5, 12, 15, 10, 5, 6, 16, 24, 26, 14, 6, 7, 20, 36, 44, 35, 18, 7, 8, 26, 52, 70, 71, 52, 23, 8, 9, 32, 70, 108, 126, 114, 69, 28, 9, 10, 40, 93, 162, 211, 216, 165, 89, 34, 10, 11, 46, 121, 228, 336, 388, 345, 234, 112, 40, 11, 12, 54, 154, 310, 524
Offset: 0

Views

Author

N. J. A. Sloane, Jun 20 2003

Keywords

Comments

Fred Lunnon [W. F. Lunnon] defines "solution" to be the smallest value not obtainable by the best set of stamps. The solutions given in this sequence and in A001208, A001209, A001210, A001211, A001212, ... are one lower than this, that is, the sequence gives the largest number obtainable without a break using the best set of stamps.

Examples

			Array begins:
   1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,  10,  11, ...
   2,   4,   7,  10,  14,  18,  23,  28,  34,  40, ...
   3,   8,  15,  26,  35,  52,  69,  89, 112, ...
   4,  12,  24,  44,  71, 114, 165, 234, ...
   5,  16,  36,  70, 126, 216, 345, ...
   6,  20,  52, 108, 211, 388, ...
   7,  26,  70, 162, 336, ...
   8,  32,  93, 228, ...
   9,  40, 121, ...
  10,  46, ...
  11, ...
  ...
		

Crossrefs

Extensions

Entry improved by comments from John Seldon (johnseldon(AT)onetel.com), Sep 15 2004
More terms from Antonio G. Astudillo (afg_astudillo(AT)lycos.com), Jun 26 2003
Comments corrected by Shawn Pedersen, Apr 17 2012

A084193 Array read by antidiagonals: T(k,n) = solution to postage stamp problem with n stamps and k denominations (n >= 1, k >= 1).

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 3, 4, 7, 8, 4, 5, 10, 15, 12, 5, 6, 14, 26, 24, 16, 6, 7, 18, 35, 44, 36, 20, 7, 8, 23, 52, 71, 70, 52, 26, 8, 9, 28, 69, 114, 126, 108, 70, 32, 9, 10, 34, 89, 165, 216, 211, 162, 93, 40, 10, 11, 40, 112, 234, 345, 388, 336, 228, 121, 46, 11, 12, 47, 146, 326, 512
Offset: 0

Views

Author

N. J. A. Sloane, Jun 20 2003

Keywords

Comments

Fred Lunnon [W. F. Lunnon] defines "solution" to be the smallest value not obtainable by the best set of stamps. The solutions given in this sequence and in A001208, A001209, A001210, A001211, A001212, ... are one lower than this, that is, the sequence gives the largest number obtainable without a break using the best set of stamps.

Examples

			Array begins:
   1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,  10,  11, ...
   2,   4,   8,  12,  16,  20,  26,  32,  40,  46, ...
   3,   7,  15,  24,  36,  52,  70,  93, 121, ...
   4,  10,  26,  44,  70, 108, 162, 228, ...
   5,  14,  35,  71, 126, 211, 336, ...
   6,  18,  52, 114, 216, 388, ...
   7,  23,  69, 165, 345, ...
   8,  28,  89, 234, ...
   9,  34, 112, ...
  10,  40, ...
  11, ...
  ...
		

Crossrefs

A084192 gives transposed array. Rows and columns give rise to A014616, A001208, A001209, A001210, A001211, A053346, A053348, A001212, A001213, A001214, A001215, A001216, A005342, A005343, A005344, A075060.

Extensions

Entry improved by comments from John Seldon (johnseldon(AT)onetel.com), Sep 15 2004
More terms from Antonio G. Astudillo (afg_astudillo(AT)lycos.com), Jun 26 2003
Comments corrected by Shawn Pedersen, Apr 17 2012

A196416 Table read by antidiagonals: V(n,m) = solution to postage stamp problem with n stamps in set, m stamps on letter.

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 3, 3, 1, 1, 4, 5, 4, 1, 1, 5, 8, 9, 5, 1, 1, 6, 11, 16, 13, 6, 1, 1, 7, 15, 27, 25, 17, 7, 1, 1, 8, 19, 36, 45, 37, 21, 8, 1, 1, 9, 24, 53, 72, 71, 53, 27, 9, 1, 1, 10, 29, 70, 115, 127, 109, 71, 33, 10, 1
Offset: 0

Views

Author

N. J. A. Sloane, Oct 01 2011

Keywords

Comments

Given n, m, the postage stamp problem is to choose a set of n nonnegative integers such that the sums of m or fewer of these integers can realize the numbers 1, 2, ..., N-1, where N is as large as possible. V(n,m) denotes the value of N.

Examples

			Array begins:
m\n 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ...
---------------------
0...1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
1...1 2 3 4 5 6 7  ...
2...1 3 5 9 13 17 21  ...
3...1 4 8 16 25 37 53 ...
4...1 5 11 27 45 71 109  ...
5...1 6 15 36 72 127 212  ...
6...1 7 19 53 115 217 389  ...
...
		

Crossrefs

A123509 Rohrbach's problem: a(n) is the largest integer such that there exists a set of n integers that is a basis of order 2 for (0, 1, ..., a(n)-1).

Original entry on oeis.org

1, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 27, 33, 41, 47, 55, 65, 73, 81, 93, 105, 117, 129, 141, 153, 165, 181, 197, 213
Offset: 1

Views

Author

Warren D. Smith, Oct 02 2006

Keywords

Comments

Notation: N[q] = the set of q+1 elements inside {0,1,...,N-1}
Length of the longest sequence of consecutive integers that can be obtained from a set of n distinct integers by summing any two integers in the set or doubling any one. - Jon E. Schoenfield, Jul 16 2017
According to Zhining Yang, Jul 08 2017, a(13) to a(20) are 65, 70, 79, 90, 101, 112, 123, 134, but there is some doubt about these terms, and they should be confirmed before they are accepted. They do not agree with the conjecture, so perhaps the VBA program is not correct.
The definition of Rohrbach's Problem in the paper of S. Gunturk and M. B. Nathanson in the links is different from the one here. In the paper, the set should contain n nonnegative integers instead of integers. The result should be equal to A001212(n-1)+1 according to the definition in the paper since adding one 0 before any set for A001212(n-1) provides a set of the problem. The data provided by Zhining Yang is obviously wrong since a(n) >= A001212(n-1)+1. And A302648 provides another lower bound of this array since a(n) >= 2*A302648(n)+1. - Zhao Hui Du, Apr 13 2018

Examples

			Example: 8[3]: 0,1,3,4 means {0,1,2,...,8} is covered thus: 0=0+0, 1=0+1, 2=1+1, 3=0+3, 4=0+4=1+3, 5=1+4, 6=3+3, 7=3+4, 8=4+4.
N[q]: set
------------------------------
3[2]: 0,1,
4[3]: 0,1,2,
5[3]: 0,1,2,
6[3]: 0,2,3,
7[4]: 0,1,2,3,
8[4]: 0,1,3,4,
9[4]: 0,1,3,4,
10[5]: 0,1,2,4,5,
11[5]: 0,1,2,4,5,
12[5]: 0,1,3,5,6,
13[5]: 0,1,3,5,6,
14[6]: 0,1,2,4,6,7,
15[6]: 0,1,2,4,6,7,
16[6]: 0,1,3,5,7,8,
17[6]: 0,1,3,5,7,8,
18[6]: 0,2,3,7,8,10,
19[7]: 0,1,2,4,6,8,9,
20[7]: 0,1,3,5,7,9,10,
21[7]: 0,1,3,5,7,9,10,
22[7]: 0,2,3,7,8,10,11,
23[8]: 0,1,2,4,6,8,10,11,
24[8]: 0,1,3,5,7,9,11,12,
25[8]: 0,1,3,5,7,9,11,12,
26[8]: 0,2,3,7,8,10,12,13,
27[8]: 0,1,3,4,9,10,12,13,
28[8]: 0,2,3,7,8,12,13,15,
29[9]: 0,1,3,5,7,9,11,13,14,
30[9]: 0,2,3,7,8,10,12,14,15,
31[9]: 0,1,3,4,9,10,12,14,15,
32[9]: 0,2,3,7,8,12,13,15,16,
a(5)=13 because we can obtain at most a total of 13 consecutive integers from a set of 5 integers by summing any two integers in the set or doubling any one; from the 5-integer set {1,2,4,6,7}, we can obtain all 13 integers in the interval [2..14] as follows: 2=1+1, 3=1+2, 4=2+2, 5=1+4, 6=2+4, 7=1+6, 8=2+6, 9=2+7, 10=4+6, 11=4+7, 12=6+6, 13=6+7, 14=7+7.
a(16)=90 because we can obtain at most a total of 90 consecutive integers from a set of 16 integers by summing any two integers in the set or doubling any one: from the 16-integer set {1,2,4,5,8,9,10,17,18,22,25,36,47,58,69,80}, we can obtain all 90 integers in the interval [2..91]. - _Jon E. Schoenfield_, Jul 16 2017
		

Crossrefs

Formula

a(n) = A001212(n-1)+1 (conjecture). - R. J. Mathar, Oct 08 2006. Comment from Martin Fuller, Mar 18 2009: I agree with this conjecture.
lim inf a(n) / n^2 > 0.2857 lim sup a(n) / n^2 < 0.4789 - Charles R Greathouse IV, Aug 11 2007

Extensions

More terms (from Smith's web site) from R. J. Mathar, Oct 08 2006
Entry revised by N. J. A. Sloane, Aug 06 2017
a(13)-a(25) from Herzog et al. added by Stefano Spezia, Jul 05 2024
Previous Showing 11-20 of 27 results. Next