cp's OEIS Frontend

Also the number of logically distinct strings of first order quantifiers in which n variables occur (C. S. Peirce, c. 1903). - Stephen Pollard (spollard(AT)truman.edu), Jun 07 2002

Stirling transform of A052849(n) = [2, 4, 12, 48, 240, ...] is a(n) = [2, 6, 26, 150, 1082, ...]. - Michael Somos, Mar 04 2004

Stirling transform of A000142(n-1) = [1, 1, 2, 6, 24, ...] is a(n-1) = [1, 2, 6, 26, ...]. - Michael Somos, Mar 04 2004

Stirling transform of (-1)^n * A024167(n-1) = [0, 1, -1, 5, -14, 94, ...] is a(n-2) = [0, 1, 2, 6, 26, ...]. - Michael Somos, Mar 04 2004

The asymptotic expansion of 2*log(n) - (2^1*log(1) + 2^2*log(2) + ... + 2^n*log(n))/2^n is (a(1)/1)/n + (a(2)/2)/n^2 + (a(3)/3)/n^3 + ... - Michael Somos, Aug 22 2004

This is the sequence of cumulants of the probability distribution of the number of tails before the first head in a sequence of fair coin tosses. - Michael Hardy (hardy(AT)math.umn.edu), May 01 2005

Appears to be row sums of A154921. - Mats Granvik, Jan 18 2009

This is the number of cyclically ordered partitions of n+1 labeled points. The ordered version is A000670. - Michael Somos, Jan 08 2011

A000670(n+1) = p(n+1) where p(x) is the unique degree-n polynomial such that p(k) = a(k) for k = 0, 1, ..., n. - Michael Somos, Apr 27 2012

Row sums of A154921 as conjectured above by Granvik. a(n) gives the number of outcomes of a race between n horses H1,...,Hn, where if a horse falls it is not ranked. For example, when n = 2 the 6 outcomes are a dead heat, H1 wins H2 second, H2 wins H1 second, H1 wins H2 falls, H2 wins H1 falls or both fall. - Peter Bala, May 15 2012

Also the number of disjoint areas of a Venn diagram for n multisets. - Aurelian Radoaca, Jun 27 2016

Also the number of ways of ordering n nonnegative integers, allowing for the possibility of ties, and also comparing the smallest integers with 0. Each comparison with 0 gives two possibilities, x > 0 or x=0. As such, without comparison with 0, we get A000670, the number of ways of ordering n nonnegative integers, allowing for the possibility of ties, or the number of ways n competitors can rank in a competition, allowing for the possibility of ties. For instance, for 2 nonnegative integers x,y, there are the following 6 ways of ordering them: x = y = 0, x = y > 0, x > y = 0, x > y > 0, y > x = 0, y > x > 0. - Aurelian Radoaca, Jul 09 2016

Also the number of ordered set partitions of subsets of {1,...,n}. Also the number of chains of distinct nonempty subsets of {1,...,n}. - Gus Wiseman, Feb 01 2019

Number of combinations of a Simplex lock having n buttons.

Row sums of the unsigned cumulant expansion polynomials A127671 and logarithmic polynomials A263634. - Tom Copeland, Jun 04 2021

Also the number of vertices in the axis-aligned polytope consisting of all vectors x in R^n where, for all k in {1,...,n}, the k-th smallest coordinate of x lies in the interval [0, k]. - Adam P. Goucher, Jan 18 2023

Number of idempotent Boolean relation matrices whose complement is also idempotent. See Rosenblatt link. - Geoffrey Critzer, Feb 26 2023

This is different from A080575 and A178867.

T(n,m) = count of set partitions of n with block lengths given by the m-th partition of n.

From Tilman Neumann, Oct 05 2008: (Start)

These are also the coefficients occurring in complete Bell polynomials, Faa di Bruno's formula (in its simplest form) and computation of moments from cumulants.

Though the Bell polynomials seem quite unwieldy, they can be computed easily as the determinant of an n-dimensional square matrix. (See, e.g., Coffey (2006) and program below.)

The complete Bell polynomial of the first n primes gives A007446. (End)

From Tom Copeland, Apr 29 2011: (Start)

A relation between partition polynomials formed from these "refined" Stirling numbers of the second kind and umbral operator trees and Lagrange inversion is presented in the link "Lagrange a la Lah".

For simple diagrams of the relation between connected graphs, cumulants, and A036040, see the references on statistical physics below. In some sense, these graphs are duals of the umbral bouquets presented in "Lagrange a la Lah". (End)

These M3 (Abramowitz-Stegun) partition polynomials are the complete Bell polynomials (see a comment above) with recurrence (see the Wikipedia link) B_0 = 1, B_n = Sum_{k=0..n-1} binomial(n-1,k) * B_{n-1-k}*x[k+1], n >= 1. - Wolfdieter Lang, Aug 31 2016

With the indeterminates (x_1, x_2, x_3,...) = (t, -c_2*t, -c_3*t, ...) with c_n > 0, umbrally B(n,a.) = B(n,t)|{t^n = a_n} = 0 and B(j,a.)B(k,a.) = B(j,t)B(k,t)|{t^n =a_n} = d_{j,k} >= 0 is the coefficient of x^j/j!*y^k/k! in the Taylor series expansion of the formal group law FGL(x,y) = f[f^{-1}(x)+f^{-1}(y)], where a_n are the inversion partition polynomials for calculating f(x) from the coefficients of the series expansion of f^{-1}(x) given in A134685. - Tom Copeland, Feb 09 2018

For applications to functionals in quantum field theory, see Figueroa et al., Brouder, Kreimer and Yeats, and Balduf. In the last two papers, the Bell polynomials with the indeterminates (x_1, x_2, x_3,...) = (c_1, 2!c_2, 3!c_3, ...) are equivalent to the partition polynomials of A130561 in the indeterminates c_n. - Tom Copeland, Dec 17 2019

From Tom Copeland, Oct 15 2020: (Start)

With a_n = n! * b_n = (n-1)! * c_n for n > 0, represent a function with f(0) = a_0 = b_0 = 1 as an

A) exponential generating function (e.g.f), or formal Taylor series: f(x) = e^{a.x} = 1 + Sum_{n > 0} a_n * x^n/n!

B) ordinary generating function (o.g.f.), or formal power series: f(x) = 1/(1-b.x) = 1 + Sum_{n > 0} b_n * x^n

C) logarithmic generating function (l.g.f): f(x) = 1 - log(1 - c.x) = 1 + Sum_{n > 0} c_n * x^n /n.

Expansions of log(f(x)) are given in

I) A127671 and A263634 for the e.g.f: log[ e^{a.*x} ] = e^{L.(a_1,a_2,...)x} = Sum_{n > 0} L_n(a_1,...,a_n) * x^n/n!, the logarithmic polynomials, cumulant expansion polynomials

II) A263916 for the o.g.f.: log[ 1/(1-b.x) ] = log[ 1 - F.(b_1,b_2,...)x ] = -Sum_{n > 0} F_n(b_1,...,b_n) * x^n/n, the Faber polynomials.

Expansions of exp(f(x)-1) are given in

III) A036040 for an e.g.f: exp[ e^{a.x} - 1 ] = e^{BELL.(a_1,...)x}, the Bell/Touchard/exponential partition polynomials, a.k.a. the Stirling partition polynomials of the second kind

IV) A130561 for an o.g.f.: exp[ b.x/(1-b.x) ] = e^{LAH.(b.,...)x}, the Lah partition polynomials

V) A036039 for an l.g.f.: exp[ -log(1-c.x) ] = e^{CIP.(c_1,...)x}, the cycle index polynomials of the symmetric groups S_n, a.k.a. the Stirling partition polynomials of the first kind.

Since exp and log are a compositional inverse pair, one can extract the indeterminates of the log set of partition polynomials from the exp set and vice versa. For a discussion of the relations among these polynomials and the combinatorics of connected and disconnected graphs/maps, see Novak and LaCroix on classical moments and cumulants and the two books on statistical mechanics referenced below. (End)

From Tom Copeland, Jun 12 2021: (Start)

These Bell polynomials and their relations to the Faa di Bruno Hopf bialgebra, correlation functions in quantum field theory, and the moment-cumulant duality are given on pp. 134 -144 of Zeidler.

An interpretation of the coefficients of the polynomials is given in expositions of the exponential formula, or principle, in Cameron et al., Duchamp, Duchamp et al., Labelle and Leroux, and Scott and Sokal along with some history. The simplest applications of this principle are given in A060540. (End)

The list partition transform of a sequence a(n) for which a(0)=1 is illustrated by:

b_0 = 1

b_1 = -a_1

b_2 = -a_2 + 2 a_1^2

b_3 = -a_3 + 6 a_2 a_1 - 6 a_1^3

b_4 = -a_4 + 8 a_3 a_1 + 6 a_2^2 - 36 a_2 a_1^2 + 24 a_1^4

... .

The unsigned coefficients are A049019 with a leading 1. The sign is dependent on the partition as evident from inspection (replace a_n's by -1).

Expressed umbrally, i.e., with the umbral operation (a.)^n := a_n,

exp(a.x) exp(b.x) = exp[(a.+b.)x] = 1; i.e., (a.+b.)^n = 1 for n=0 and 0 for all other values of n.

Expressed recursively,

b_0 = 1, b_n = -Sum_{j=1..n} binomial(n,j) a_j b_{n-j}; which is conditionally self-inverse, i.e., the roles of a_k and b_k may be reversed with a_0 = b_0 = 1.

Expressed in matrix form, b_n form the first column of B = matrix inverse of A .

A = Pascal matrix diagonally multiplied by a_n, i.e., A_{n,k} = binomial(n,k)* a_{n-k}.

Some examples of reciprocal pairs of sequences under these operations are:

1) A084358 and -A000262 with the first term set to 1.

2) (1,-1,0,0,...) and (0!,1!,2!,3!,...) with the unsigned associated matrices A128229 and A094587.

3) (1,-1,-1,-1,...) and A000670.

4) A000110 and A000587.

5) (1,-2,-2,0,0,0,...) and (0! c_1,1! c_2,2! c_3,3! c_4,...) where c_n = A000129(n) with the associated matrices A110327 and A110330.

6) (1,-2,2,0,0,0,...) and (1!,2!,3!,4!,...).

7) Sequences of rising and signed lowering factorials form reciprocal pairs where a_n = (-1)^n m!/(m-n)! and b_n = (m-1+n)!/(m-1)! for m=0,1,2,... .

Denote the action of the list partition transform on the sequence a. or an invertible matrix M by LPT(a.) = b. or LPT(M)= M^(-1).

If the matrix equation M = exp(T) also holds, then exp[a.*T]*exp[b.*T] = exp[(a.+b.)*T] = I, the identity matrix, because (a.+b.)^n = delta_n, the Kronecker delta with delta_n = 1 and delta_n = 0 otherwise, i.e., (0)^n = delta_n.

Therefore, [exp(a.*T)]^(-1) = exp[b.*T] = exp[LPT(a.)*T] = LPT[exp(a.*T)].

The fundamental Pascal (A007318), unsigned Lah (A105278) and associated Laguerre matrices can be generated by exponentiation of special infinitesimal matrices (see A132440, A132710 and A132681) such that finding LPT(a.) amounts to multiplying the k'th diagonal of the fundamental matrices by a_k for every diagonal followed by matrix inversion and then extraction of the b_n factors from the first column (simplest for the Pascal formulas above).

Conversely, the inverses of matrices formed by diagonally multiplying the three fundamental matrices by a_k are given by diagonally multiplying the fundamental matrices by b_k.

If LPT(M) is defined differently as application of the top formula to a_n = M^n, then b_n = (-M)^n and the formalism could even be applied to more general sequences of matrices M., providing the reciprocal of exp[t*M.].

The group of fundamental lower triangular matrices M = exp(T) such that LPT[exp(a.*T)] = exp[LPT(a.)*T] = [exp[a.*T]]^(-1) are obtained by infinitesimal generator matrices of the form T =

0;

t(0), 0;

0, t(1), 0;

0, 0, t(2), 0;

0, 0, 0, t(3), 0;

... .

T^m has trivially vanishing terms except along the m'th subdiagonal, which is a sequence of generalized factorials:

[ t(0)*t(1)...t(m-2)*t(m-1), t(1)*t(2)...t(m-1)*t(m), t(2)*t(3)...t(m)*t(m+1), ... ].

Therefore the principal submatrices of T (given by setting t(j) = 0 for j > n-1) are nilpotent with at least [Tsub_n]^(n+1) = 0.

The general group of matrices GM[a.] = exp[a.*T] can also be obtained through diagonal multiplication of M = exp(T) by the sequence a_n, as in the Pascal matrix example above and their inverses by diagonal multiplication by b. = LPT(a.).

Weighted-mappings interpretation for the top partition equation:

Given n pre-nodes (Pre) and k post-nodes (Post), each Pre is connected to only one Post and each Post has at least one Pre connected to it (surjections or onto functions/maps). Weight each Post by -a_m where m is the number of connections to the Post.

Weight each map by the product of the Post weights and multiply by the number of maps that share the same connectivity. Sum over the possible mappings for n Pre. The result is b_n.

E.g., b_3 = [ 3 Pre to 1 Post ] + [ 3 Pre to 2 Post ] + [ 3 Pre to 3 Post ]

= [1 map with 1 Post with 3 connections] + [ 6 maps with 1 Post with 2 connections and 1 Post with 1 connection] + [6 maps with 3 Post with 1 connection each]

= -a_3 + 6 * [-a_2*(-a_1)] + 6 * [-a_1*(-a_1)*(-a_1)].

See A263633 for the complementary formulation for the reciprocal of o.g.f.s rather than e.g.f.s and computations of these partition polynomials as Gram determinants. - Tom Copeland, Dec 04 2016

The coefficients of the partition polynomials enumerate the faces of the convex, bounded polytopes called permutohedra, and the absolute value of the sum of the coefficients gives the Euler characteristic of unity for each polytope; i.e., the absolute value of the sum of each row of the array is unity. In addition, the signs of the faces alternate with dimension, and the coefficients of faces with the same dimension for each polytope have the same sign. - Tom Copeland, Nov 13 2019

With the fundamental matrix chosen to be the lower triangular Pascal matrix M, the matrix MA whose n-th diagonals are multiplied by a_n (i.e., MA_{i,j} = PM_{i,j} * a_{i-j}) gives a matrix representation of the e.g.f. associated to the Appell polynomial sequence defined by e^{a.t}e^{xt}= e^{(a.+x)t} = e^{A.(x)t} where umbrally (A.(x))^n = A_n(x) = (a. + x)^n = sum_{k=0..n} binomial(n,k) a_k x^{n-k} are the associated Appell polynomials. Left multiplication of the column vector (1,x,x^2,..) by MA gives the Appell polynomial sequence, and multiplication of the two e.g.f.s e^{a.t} and e^{b.t} corresponds to multiplication of their respective matrix representations MA and MB. Forming the reciprocal of an e.g.f. corresponds to taking the matrix inverse of its matrix representation as noted above. A263634 gives an associated modified Pascal matrix representation of the raising operator for the Appell sequence. - Tom Copeland, Nov 13 2019

The diagonal of MA consists of all ones. Let MAN be the truncated square submatrix of MA containing the coefficients of the first N Appell polynomials A_k=(a.+x)^k = Sum(j=0 to k) MAN(k,j) x^j. Then by the Cayley-Hamilton theorem (I-MAN)^N = 0; therefore, MAN^(-1) = Sum(k=1 to N) binomial(N,k) (-MAN)^{k-1} = MBN, the inverse of MAN, containing the coefficients of the first N rows of the Appell polynomials B_k(x) = (b. + x)^k = Sum(j=0 to k) MBN(k,j) x^j, which are the umbral compositional inverses of the Appell row polynomials A_k(x) of MAN; that is, A_k(B.(x)) = x^k = B_k(A.(x)), where, e.g., (A.(x))^k = A_k(x). - Tom Copeland, May 13 2020

The use of the term 'list partition transform' resulted from one of my first uses of these partition polynomials in relating A000262 to A084358 with their simple e.g.f.s. Other appropriate names would be the permutohedra polynomials since they are refined Euler characteristics of the permutohedra or the reciprocal polynomials since they give the multiplicative inverses of e.g.f.s with a constant of 1. - Tom Copeland, Oct 09 2022

The sequence of row lengths is A000041(n), n >= 1 (partition numbers).

Number of permutations whose cycle structure is the given partition. Row sums are factorials (A000142). - Franklin T. Adams-Watters, Jan 12 2006

A relation between partition polynomials formed from these "refined" Stirling numbers of the first kind and umbral operator trees and Lagrange inversion is presented in the link "Lagrange a la Lah".

These cycle index polynomials for the symmetric group S_n are also related to a raising operator / infinitesimal generator for fractional integro-derivatives, involving the digamma function and the Riemann zeta function values at positive integers, and to the characteristic polynomial for the adjacency matrix of complete n-graphs A055137 (cf. MathOverflow link). - Tom Copeland, Nov 03 2012

In the Lang link, replace all x(n) by t to obtain A132393. Furthermore replace x(1) by t and all other x(n) by 1 to obtain A008290. See A274760. - Tom Copeland, Nov 06 2012, Oct 29 2015 - corrected by Johannes W. Meijer, Jul 28 2016

The umbral compositional inverses of these polynomials are formed by negating the indeterminates x(n) for n>1, i.e., P(n,P(.,x(1),-x(2),-x(3),...),x(2),x(3),...) = x(1)^n (cf. A130561 for an example of umbral compositional inversion). The polynomials are an Appell sequence in x(1), i.e., dP(n,x(1))/dx(1) = n P(n-1, x(1)) and (P(.,x)+y)^n=P(n,x+y) umbrally, with P(0,x(1))=1. - Tom Copeland, Nov 14 2014

Regarded as the coefficients of the partition polynomials listed by Lang, a signed version of these polynomials IF(n,b1,b2,...,bn) (n! times polynomial on page 184 of Airault and Bouali) provides an inversion of the Faber polynomials F(n,b1,b2,...,bn) (page 52 of Bouali, A263916, and A115131). For example, F(3, IF(1,b1), IF(2,b1,b2)/2!, IF(3,b1,b2,b3)/3!) = b3 and IF(3, F(1,b1), F(2,b1,b2), F(3,b1,b2,b3))/3! = b3 with F(1,b1) = -b1. (Compare with A263634.) - Tom Copeland, Oct 28 2015; Sep 09 2016

The e.g.f. for the row partition polynomials is Sum_{n>=0} P_n(b_1,...,b_n) x^n/n! = exp[Sum_{n>=1} b_n x^n/n], or, exp[P.(b_1,...,b_n)x] = exp[-], expressed umbrally with <"power series"> denoting umbral evaluation (b.)^n = b_n within the power series. This e.g.f. is central to the paper by Maxim and Schuermannn on characteristic classes (cf. Friedrich and McKay also). - Tom Copeland, Nov 11 2015

The elementary Schur polynomials are given by S(n,x(1),x(2),...,x(n)) = P(n,x(1), 2*x(2),...,n*x(n)) / n!. See p. 12 of Carrell. - Tom Copeland, Feb 06 2016

These partition polynomials are also related to the Casimir invariants associated to quantum density states on p. 3 of Boya and Dixit and pp. 5 and 6 of Byrd and Khaneja. - Tom Copeland, Jul 24 2017

With the indeterminates (x_1,x_2,x_3,...) = (t,-c_2*t,-c_3*t,...) with c_n >0, umbrally P(n,a.) = P(n,t)|{t^n = a_n} = 0 and P(j,a.)P(k,a.) = P(j,t)P(k,t)|{t^n =a_n} = d_{j,k} >= 0 is the coefficient of x^j/j!*y^k/k! in the Taylor series expansion of the formal group law FGL(x,y) = f[f^{-1}(x)+f^{-1}(y)], where a_n are the inversion partition polynomials for calculating f(x) from the coefficients of the series expansion of f^{-1}(x) given in A133932. - Tom Copeland, Feb 09 2018

For relation to the Witt symmetric functions, as well as the basic power, elementary, and complete symmetric functions, see the Borger link p. 295. For relations to diverse zeta functions, determinants, and paths on graphs, see the MathOverflow question Cycling Through the Zeta Garden. - Tom Copeland, Mar 25 2018

Chmutov et al. identify the partition polynomials of this entry with the one-part Schur polynomials and assert that any linear combination with constant coefficients of these polynomials is a tau function for the KP hierarchy. - Tom Copeland, Apr 05 2018

With the indeterminates in the partition polynomials assigned as generalized harmonic numbers, i.e., as partial sums of the Dirichlet series for the Riemann zeta function, zeta(n), for integer n > 1, sums of simple normalizations of these polynomials give either unity or simple sums of consecutive zeta(n) (cf. Hoffman). Other identities involving these polynomials can be found in the Choi reference in Hoffman's paper. - Tom Copeland, Oct 05 2019

On p. 39 of Ma Luo's thesis is the e.g.f. of rational functions r_n obtained through the (umbral) formula 1/(1-r.T) = exp[log(1+P.T)], a differently signed e.g.f. of this entry, where (P.)^n = P_n are Eisenstein elliptic functions. P. 38 gives the example of 4! * r_4 as the signed 4th row partition polynomial of this entry. This series is equated through a simple proportionality factor to the Zagier Jacobi form on p. 25. Recurrence relations for the P_n are given on p. 24 involving the normalized k-weight Eisenstein series G_k introduced on p. 23 and related to the Bernoulli numbers. - Tom Copeland, Oct 16 2019

The Chern characteristic classes or forms of complex vector bundles and the characteristic polynomials of curvature forms for a smooth manifold can be expressed in terms of this entry's partition polynomials with the associated traces, or power sum polynomials, as the indeterminates. The Chern character is the e.g.f. of these traces and so its coefficients are given by the Faber polynomials with this entry's partition polynomials as the indeterminates. See the Mathoverflow question "A canonical reference for Chern characteristic classes". - Tom Copeland, Nov 04 2019

For an application to the physics of charged fermions in an external field, see Figueroa et al. - Tom Copeland, Dec 05 2019

Konopelchenko, in Proposition 5.2, p. 19, defines an operator P_k that is a differently signed operator version of the partition polynomials of this entry divided by a factorial. These operators give rise to bilinear Hirota equations for the KP hierarchy. These partition polynomials are also presented in Hopf algebras of symmetric functions by Cartier. - Tom Copeland, Dec 18 2019

For relationship of these partition polynomials to calculations of Pontryagin classes and the Riemann xi function, see A231846. - Tom Copeland, May 27 2020

Luest and Skliros summarize on p. 298 many of the properties of the cycle index polynomials given here; and Bianchi and Firrotta, a few on p. 6. - Tom Copeland, Oct 15 2020

From Tom Copeland, Oct 15 2020: (Start)

With a_n = n! * b_n = (n-1)! * c_n for n > 0, represent a function with f(0) = a_0 = b_0 = 1 as an

A) exponential generating function (e.g.f), or formal Taylor series: f(x) = e^{a.x} = 1 + Sum_{n > 0} a_n * x^n/n!

B) ordinary generating function (o.g.f.), or formal power series: f(x) = 1/(1-b.x) = 1 + Sum_{n > 0} b_n * x^n

C) logarithmic generating function (l.g.f): f(x) = 1 - log(1 - c.x) = 1 + Sum_{n > 0} c_n * x^n /n.

Expansions of log(f(x)) are given in

I) A127671 and A263634 for the e.g.f: log[ e^{a.*x} ] = e^{L.(a_1,a_2,...)x} = Sum_{n > 0} L_n(a_1,...,a_n) * x^n/n!, the logarithmic polynomials, cumulant expansion polynomials

II) A263916 for the o.g.f.: log[ 1/(1-b.x) ] = log[ 1 - F.(b_1,b_2,...)x ] = -Sum_{n > 0} F_n(b_1,...,b_n) * x^n/n, the Faber polynomials.

Expansions of exp(f(x)-1) are given in

III) A036040 for an e.g.f: exp[ e^{a.x} - 1 ] = e^{BELL.(a_1,...)x}, the Bell/Touchard/exponential partition polynomials, a.k.a. the Stirling partition polynomials of the second kind

IV) A130561 for an o.g.f.: exp[ b.x/(1-b.x) ] = e^{LAH.(b.,...)x}, the Lah partition polynomials

V) A036039 for an l.g.f.: exp[ -log(1-c.x) ] = e^{CIP.(c_1,...)x}, the cycle index polynomials of the symmetric groups S_n, a.k.a. the Stirling partition polynomials of the first kind.

Since exp and log are a compositional inverse pair, one can extract the indeterminates of the log set of partition polynomials from the exp set and vice versa. For a discussion of the relations among these polynomials and the combinatorics of connected and disconnected graphs/maps, see Novak and LaCroix on classical moments and cumulants and the two books on statistical mechanics referenced in A036040. (End)

Let M = n X n matrix with (i,j)-th entry a(n+1-j, n+1-i), e.g., if n = 3, M = [1 1 1; 3 1 0; 2 0 0]. Given a sequence s = [s(0)..s(n-1)], let b = [b(0)..b(n-1)] be its inverse binomial transform and let c = [c(0)..c(n-1)] = M^(-1)*transpose(b). Then s(k) = Sum_{i=0..n-1} b(i)*binomial(k,i) = Sum_{i=0..n-1} c(i)*k^i, k=0..n-1. - Gary W. Adamson, Nov 11 2001

From Gary W. Adamson, Aug 09 2008: (Start)

Julius Worpitzky's 1883 algorithm generates Bernoulli numbers.

By way of example [Wikipedia]:

B0 = 1;

B1 = 1/1 - 1/2;

B2 = 1/1 - 3/2 + 2/3;

B3 = 1/1 - 7/2 + 12/3 - 6/4;

B4 = 1/1 - 15/2 + 50/3 - 60/4 + 24/5;

B5 = 1/1 - 31/2 + 180/3 - 390/4 + 360/5 - 120/6;

B6 = 1/1 - 63/2 + 602/3 - 2100/4 + 3360/5 - 2520/6 + 720/7;

...

Note that in this algorithm, odd n's for the Bernoulli numbers sum to 0, not 1, and the sum for B1 = 1/2 = (1/1 - 1/2). B3 = 0 = (1 - 7/2 + 13/3 - 6/4) = 0. The summation for B4 = -1/30. (End)

Pursuant to Worpitzky's algorithm and given M = A028246 as an infinite lower triangular matrix, M * [1/1, -1/2, 1/3, ...] (i.e., the Harmonic series with alternate signs) = the Bernoulli numbers starting [1/1, 1/2, 1/6, ...]. - Gary W. Adamson, Mar 22 2012

From Tom Copeland, Oct 23 2008: (Start)

G(x,t) = 1/(1 + (1-exp(x*t))/t) = 1 + 1 x + (2 + t)*x^2/2! + (6 + 6t + t^2)*x^3/3! + ... gives row polynomials for A090582, the f-polynomials for the permutohedra (see A019538).

G(x,t-1) = 1 + 1*x + (1 + t)*x^2 / 2! + (1 + 4t + t^2)*x^3 / 3! + ... gives row polynomials for A008292, the h-polynomials for permutohedra.

G[(t+1)x,-1/(t+1)] = 1 + (1+ t) x + (1 + 3t + 2 t^2) x^2 / 2! + ... gives row polynomials for the present triangle. (End)

The Worpitzky triangle seems to be an apt name for this triangle. - Johannes W. Meijer, Jun 18 2009

If Pascal's triangle is written as a lower triangular matrix and multiplied by A028246 written as an upper triangular matrix, the product is a matrix where the (i,j)-th term is (i+1)^j. For example,

1,0,0,0 1,1,1, 1 1,1, 1, 1

1,1,0,0 * 0,1,3, 7 = 1,2, 4, 8

1,2,1,0 0,0,2,12 1,3, 9,27

1,3,3,1 0,0,0, 6 1,4,16,64

So, numbering all three matrices' rows and columns starting at 0, the (i,j) term of the product is (i+1)^j. - Jack A. Cohen (ProfCohen(AT)comcast.net), Aug 03 2010

The Fi1 and Fi2 triangle sums are both given by sequence A000670. For the definition of these triangle sums see A180662. The mirror image of the Worpitzky triangle is A130850. - Johannes W. Meijer, Apr 20 2011

Let S_n(m) = 1^m + 2^m + ... + n^m. Then, for n >= 0, we have the following representation of S_n(m) as a linear combination of the binomial coefficients:

S_n(m) = Sum_{i=1..n+1} a(i+n*(n+1)/2)*C(m,i). E.g., S_2(m) = a(4)*C(m,1) + a(5)*C(m,2) + a(6)*C(m,3) = C(m,1) + 3*C(m,2) + 2*C(m,3). - Vladimir Shevelev, Dec 21 2011

Given the set X = [1..n] and 1 <= k <= n, then a(n,k) is the number of sets T of size k of subset S of X such that S is either empty or else contains 1 and another element of X and such that any two elemements of T are either comparable or disjoint. - Michael Somos, Apr 20 2013

Working with the row and column indexing starting at -1, a(n,k) gives the number of k-dimensional faces in the first barycentric subdivision of the standard n-dimensional simplex (apply Brenti and Welker, Lemma 2.1). For example, the barycentric subdivision of the 2-simplex (a triangle) has 1 empty face, 7 vertices, 12 edges and 6 triangular faces giving row 4 of this triangle as (1,7,12,6). Cf. A053440. - Peter Bala, Jul 14 2014

See A074909 and above g.f.s for associations among this array and the Bernoulli polynomials and their umbral compositional inverses. - Tom Copeland, Nov 14 2014

An e.g.f. G(x,t) = exp[P(.,t)x] = 1/t - 1/[t+(1-t)(1-e^(-xt^2))] = (1-t) * x + (-2t + 3t^2 - t^3) * x^2/2! + (6t^2 - 12t^3 + 7t^4 - t^5) * x^3/3! + ... for the shifted, reverse, signed polynomials with the first element nulled, is generated by the infinitesimal generator g(u,t)d/du = [(1-u*t)(1-(1+u)t)]d/du, i.e., exp[x * g(u,t)d/du] u eval. at u=0 generates the polynomials. See A019538 and the G. Rzadkowski link below for connections to the Bernoulli and Eulerian numbers, a Ricatti differential equation, and a soliton solution to the KdV equation. The inverse in x of this e.g.f. is Ginv(x,t) = (-1/t^2)*log{[1-t(1+x)]/[(1-t)(1-tx)]} = [1/(1-t)]x + [(2t-t^2)/(1-t)^2]x^2/2 + [(3t^2-3t^3+t^4)/(1-t)^3]x^3/3 + [(4t^3-6t^4+4t^5-t^6)/(1-t)^4]x^4/4 + ... . The numerators are signed, shifted A135278 (reversed A074909), and the rational functions are the columns of A074909. Also, dG(x,t)/dx = g(G(x,t),t) (cf. A145271). (Analytic G(x,t) added, and Ginv corrected and expanded on Dec 28 2015.) - Tom Copeland, Nov 21 2014

The operator R = x + (1 + t) + t e^{-D} / [1 + t(1-e^(-D))] = x + (1+t) + t - (t+t^2) D + (t+3t^2+2t^3) D^2/2! - ... contains an e.g.f. of the reverse row polynomials of the present triangle, i.e., A123125 * A007318 (with row and column offset 1 and 1). Umbrally, R^n 1 = q_n(x;t) = (q.(0;t)+x)^n, with q_m(0;t) = (t+1)^(m+1) - t^(m+1), the row polynomials of A074909, and D = d/dx. In other words, R generates the Appell polynomials associated with the base sequence A074909. For example, R 1 = q_1(x;t) = (q.(0;t)+x) = q_1(0;t) + q__0(0;t)x = (1+2t) + x, and R^2 1 = q_2(x;t) = (q.(0;t)+x)^2 = q_2(0:t) + 2q_1(0;t)x + q_0(0;t)x^2 = 1+3t+3t^2 + 2(1+2t)x + x^2. Evaluating the polynomials at x=0 regenerates the base sequence. With a simple sign change in R, R generates the Appell polynomials associated with A248727. - Tom Copeland, Jan 23 2015

For a natural refinement of this array, see A263634. - Tom Copeland, Nov 06 2015

From Wolfdieter Lang, Mar 13 2017: (Start)

The e.g.f. E(n, x) for {S(n, m)}{m>=0} with S(n, m) = Sum{k=1..m} k^n, n >= 0, (with undefined sum put to 0) is exp(x)*R(n+1, x) with the exponential row polynomials R(n, x) = Sum_{k=1..n} a(n, k)*x^k/k!. E.g., e.g.f. for n = 2, A000330: exp(x)*(1*x/1!+3*x^2/2!+2*x^3/3!).

The o.g.f. G(n, x) for {S(n, m)}{m >=0} is then found by Laplace transform to be G(n, 1/p) = p*Sum{k=1..n} a(n+1, k)/(p-1)^(2+k).

Hence G(n, x) = x/(1 - x)^(n+2)*Sum_{k=1..n} A008292(n,k)*x^(k-1).

E.g., n=2: G(2, 1/p) = p*(1/(p-1)^2 + 3/(p-1)^3 + 2/(p-1)^4) = p^2*(1+p)/(p-1)^4; hence G(2, x) = x*(1+x)/(1-x)^4.

This works also backwards: from the o.g.f. to the e.g.f. of {S(n, m)}_{m>=0}. (End)

a(n,k) is the number of k-tuples of pairwise disjoint and nonempty subsets of a set of size n. - Dorian Guyot, May 21 2019

From Rajesh Kumar Mohapatra, Mar 16 2020: (Start)

a(n-1,k) is the number of chains of length k in a partially ordered set formed from subsets of an n-element set ordered by inclusion such that the first term of the chains is either the empty set or an n-element set.

Also, a(n-1,k) is the number of distinct k-level rooted fuzzy subsets of an n-set ordered by set inclusion. (End)

The relations on p. 34 of Hasan (also p. 17 of Franco and Hasan) agree with the relation between A019538 and this entry given in the formula section. - Tom Copeland, May 14 2020

T(n,k) is the size of the Green's L-classes in the D-classes of rank (k-1) in the semigroup of partial transformations on an (n-1)-set. - Geoffrey Critzer, Jan 09 2023

T(n,k) is the number of strongly connected binary relations on [n] that have period k (A367948) and index 1. See Theorem 5.4.25(6) in Ki Hang Kim reference. - Geoffrey Critzer, Dec 07 2023

Coefficients are listed in Abramowitz and Stegun order (A036036).

Given an invertible function f(t) analytic about t=0 (or a formal power series) with f(0)=0 and Df(0) not equal to 0, form h(t) = t / f(t) and let h_n denote the coefficient of t^n in h(t).

Lagrange inversion gives the compositional inverse about t=0 as g(t) = Sum_{j>=1} ( t^j * (1/j) * Sum_{permutations s with s(1) + s(2) + ... + s(j) = j - 1} h_s(1) * h_s(2) * ... * h_s(j) ) = t * T(1,1) * h_0 + Sum_{j>=2} ( t^j * Sum_{k=1..(# of partitions for j-1)} T(j,k) * H(j-1,k ; h_0,h_1,...) ), where H(j-1,k ; h_0,h_1,...) is the k-th partition for h_1 through h_(j-1) corresponding to n=j-1 on page 831 of Abramowitz and Stegun (ordered as in A&S) with (h_0)^(j-m)=(h_0)^(n+1-m) appended to each partition subsumed under n and m of A&S.

Denoting h_n by (n') for brevity, to 8th order in t,

g(t) = t * (0')

+ t^2 * [ (0') (1') ]

+ t^3 * [ (0')^2 (2') + (0') (1')^2 ]

+ t^4 * [ (0')^3 (3') + 3 (0')^2 (1') (2') + (0') (1')^3 ]

+ t^5 * [ (0')^4 (4') + 4 (0')^3 (1') (3') + 2 (0')^3 (2')^2 + 6 (0')^2 (1')^2 (2') + (0') (1')^4 ]

+ t^6 * [ (0')^5 (5') + 5 (0')^4 (1') (4') + 5 (0')^4 (2') (3') + 10 (0')^3 (1')^2 (3') + 10 (0')^3 (1') (2')^2 + 10 (0')^2 (1')^3 (2') + (0') (1')^5 ]

+ t^7 * [ (0')^6 (6') + 6 (0')^5 (1') (5') + 6 (0')^5 (2') (4') + 3 (0')^5 (3')^2 + 15 (0')^4 (1')^2 (4') + 30 (0')^4 (1') (2') (3') + 5 (0')^4 (2')^3 + 20 (0')^3 (1')^3 (3') + 30 (0')^3 (1')^2 (2')^2 + 15 (0')^2 (1')^4 (2') + (0') (1')^6]

+ t^8 * [ (0')^7 (7') + 7 (0')^6 (1') (6') + 7 (0')^6 (2') (5') + 7 (0')^6 (3') (4') + 21 (0')^5 (1')^2* (5') + 42 (0')^5 (1') (2') (4') + 21 (0')^5 (1') (3')^2 + 21 (0')^5 (2')^2 (3') + 35 (0')^4 (1')^3 (4') + 105 (0)^4 (1')^2 (2') (3') + 35 (0')^4 (1') (2')^3 + 35 (0')^3 (1')^4 (3') + 70 (0')^3 (1')^3 (2')^2 + 21 (0')^2 (1')^5 (2') + (0') (1')^7 ]

+ ..., where from the formula section, for example, T(8,1',2',...,7') = 7! / ((8 - (1'+ 2' + ... + 7'))! * 1'! * 2'! * ... * 7'!) are the coefficients of the integer partitions (1')^1' (2')^2' ... (7')^7' in the t^8 term.

A125181 is an extended, reordered version of the above sequence, omitting the leading 1, with alternate interpretations.

If the coefficients of partitions with the same exponent for h_0 are summed within rows, A001263 is obtained, omitting the leading 1.

From identification of the elements of the inversion with those on page 25 of the Ardila et al. link, the coefficients of the irregular table enumerate non-crossing partitions on [n]. - Tom Copeland, Oct 13 2014

From Tom Copeland, Oct 28-29 2014: (Start)

Operating with d/d(1') = d/d(h_1) on the n-th partition polynomial Prt(n;h_0,h_1,..,h_n) in square brackets above associated with t^(n+1) generates n * Prt(n-1;h_0,h_1,..,h_(n-1)); therefore, the polynomials are an Appell sequence of polynomials in the indeterminate h_1 when h_0=1 (a special type of Sheffer sequence).

Consequently, umbrally, [Prt(.;1,x,h_2,..) + y]^n = Prt(n;1,x+y,h_2,..); that is, Sum_{k=0..n} binomial(n,k) * Prt(k;1,x,h_2,..) * y^(n-k) = Prt(n;1,x+y,h_2,..).

Or, e^(x*z) * exp[Prt(.;1,0,h_2,..) * z] = exp[Prt(.;1,x,h_2,..) * z]. Then with x = h_1 = -(1/2) * d^2[f(t)]/dt^2 evaluated at t=0, the formal Laplace transform from z to 1/t of this expression generates g(t), the comp. inverse of f(t), when h_0 = 1 = df(t)/dt eval. at t=0.

I.e., t / (1 - t*(x + Prt(.;1,0,h_2,..))) = t / (1 - t*Prt(.;1,x,h_2,..)) = g(t), interpreted umbrally, when h_0 = 1.

(End)

Connections to and between arrays associated to the Catalan (A000108 and A007317), Riordan (A005043), Fibonacci (A000045), and Fine (A000957) numbers and to lattice paths, e.g., the Motzkin, Dyck, and Łukasiewicz, can be made explicit by considering the inverse in x of the o.g.f. of A104597(x,-t), i.e., f(x) = P(Cinv(x),t-1) = Cinv(x) / (1 + (t-1)*Cinv(x)) = x*(1-x) / (1 + (t-1)*x*(1-x)) = (x-x^2) / (1 + (t-1)*(x-x^2)), where Cinv(x) = x*(1-x) is the inverse of C(x) = (1 - sqrt(1-4*x)) / 2, a shifted o.g.f. for the Catalan numbers, and P(x,t) = x / (1+t*x) with inverse Pinv(x,t) = -P(-x,t) = x / (1-t*x). Then h(x,t) = x / f(x,t) = x * (1+(t-1)Cinv(x)) / Cinv(x) = 1 + t*x + x^2 + x^3 + ..., i.e., h_1=t and all other coefficients are 1, so the inverse of f(x,t) in x, which is explicitly in closed form finv(x,t) = C(Pinv(x,t-1)), is given by A091867, whose coefficients are sums of the refined Narayana numbers above obtained by setting h_1=(1')=t in the partition polynomials and all other coefficients to one. The group generators C(x) and P(x,t) and their inverses allow associations to be easily made between these classic number arrays. - Tom Copeland, Nov 03 2014

From Tom Copeland, Nov 10 2014: (Start)

Inverting in x with t a parameter, let F(x;t,n) = x - t*x^(n+1). Then h(x) = x / F(x;t,n) = 1 / (1-t*x^n) = 1 + t*x^n + t^2*x^(2n) + t^3*x^(3n) + ..., so h_k vanishes unless k = m*n with m an integer in which case h_k = t^m.

Finv(x;t,n) = Sum_{j>=0} {binomial((n+1)*j,j) / (n*j + 1)} * t^j * x^(n*j + 1), which gives the Catalan numbers for n=1, and the Fuss-Catalan sequences for n>1 (see A001764, n=2). [Added braces to disambiguate the formula. - N. J. A. Sloane, Oct 20 2015]

This relation reveals properties of the partitions and sums of the coefficients of the array. For n=1, h_k = t^k for all k, implying that the row sums are the Catalan numbers. For n = 2, h_k for k odd vanishes, implying that there are no blocks with only even-indexed h_k on the even-numbered rows and that only the blocks containing only even-sized bins contribute to the odd-row sums giving the Fuss-Catalan numbers for n=2. And so on, for n > 2.

These relations are reflected in any combinatorial structures enumerated by this array and the partitions, such as the noncrossing partitions depicted for a five-element set (a pentagon) in Wikipedia.

(End)

From Tom Copeland, Nov 12 2014: (Start)

An Appell sequence possesses an umbral inverse sequence (cf. A249548). The partition polynomials here, Prt(n;1,h_1,...), are an Appell sequence in the indeterminate h_1=u, so have an e.g.f. exp[Prt(.;1,u,h_2...)*t] = e^(u*t) * exp[Prt(.;1,0,h2,...)*t] with umbral inverses with an e.g.f e^(-u*t) / exp[Prt(.;1,0,h2,...)*t]. This makes contact with the formalism of A133314 (cf. also A049019 and A019538) and the signed, refined face partition polynomials of the permutahedra (or their duals), which determine the reciprocal of exp[Prt(.,0,u,h2...)*t] (cf. A249548) or exp[Prt(.;1,u,h2,...)*t], forming connections among the combinatorics of permutahedra and the noncrossing partitions, Dyck paths and trees (cf. A125181), and many other important structures isomorphic to the partitions of this entry, as well as to formal cumulants through A127671 and algebraic structures of Lie algebras. (Cf. relationship of permutahedra with the Eulerians A008292.)

(End)

From Tom Copeland, Nov 24 2014: (Start)

The n-th row multiplied by n gives the number of terms in the homogeneous symmetric monomials generated by [x(1) + x(2) + ... + x(n+1)]^n under the umbral mapping x(m)^j = h_j, for any m. E.g., [a + b + c]^2 = [a^2 + b^2 + c^2] + 2 * [a*b + a*c + b*c] is mapped to [3 * h_2] + 2 * [3 * h_1^2], and 3 * A134264(3) = 3 *(1,1)= (3,3) the number of summands in the two homogeneous polynomials in the square brackets. For n=3, [a + b + c + d]^3 = [a^3 + b^3 + ...] + 3 [a*b^2 + a*c^2 + ...] + 6 [a*b*c + a*c*d + ...] maps to [4 * h_3] + 3 [12 * h_1 * h_2] + 6 [4 * (h_1)^3], and the number of terms in the brackets is given by 4 * A134264(4) = 4 * (1,3,1) = (4,12,4).

The further reduced expression is 4 h_3 + 36 h_1 h_2 + 24 (h_1)^3 = A248120(4) with h_0 = 1. The general relation is n * A134264(n) = A248120(n) / A036038(n-1) where the arithmetic is performed on the coefficients of matching partitions in each row n.

Abramowitz and Stegun give combinatorial interpretations of A036038 and relations to other number arrays.

This can also be related to repeated umbral composition of Appell sequences and topology with the Bernoulli numbers playing a special role. See the Todd class link.

(End)

These partition polynomials are dubbed the Voiculescu polynomials on page 11 of the He and Jejjala link. - Tom Copeland, Jan 16 2015

See page 5 of the Josuat-Verges et al. reference for a refinement of these partition polynomials into a noncommutative version composed of nondecreasing parking functions. - Tom Copeland, Oct 05 2016

(Per Copeland's Oct 13 2014 comment.) The number of non-crossing set partitions whose block sizes are the parts of the n-th integer partition, where the ordering of integer partitions is first by total, then by length, then lexicographically by the reversed sequence of parts. - Gus Wiseman, Feb 15 2019

With h_0 = 1 and the other h_n replaced by suitably signed partition polynomials of A263633, the refined face partition polynomials for the associahedra of normalized A133437 with a shift in indices are obtained (cf. In the Realm of Shadows). - Tom Copeland, Sep 09 2019

Number of primitive parking functions associated to each partition of n. See Lemma 3.8 on p. 28 of Rattan. - Tom Copeland, Sep 10 2019

With h_n = n + 1, the d_k (A006013) of Table 2, p. 18, of Jong et al. are obtained, counting the n-point correlation functions in a quantum field theory. - Tom Copeland, Dec 25 2019

By inspection of the diagrams on Robert Dickau's website, one can see the relationship between the monomials of this entry and the connectivity of the line segments of the noncrossing partitions. - Tom Copeland, Dec 25 2019

Speicher has examples of the first four inversion partition polynomials on pp. 22 and 23 with his k_n equivalent to h_n = (n') here with h_0 = 1. Identifying z = t, C(z) = t/f(t) = h(t), and M(z) = f^(-1)(t)/t, then statement (3), on p. 43, of Theorem 3.26, C(z M(z)) = M(z), is equivalent to substituting f^(-1)(t) for t in t/f(t), and statement (4), M(z/C(z)) = C(z), to substituting f(t) for t in f^(-1)(t)/t. - Tom Copeland, Dec 08 2021

Given a Laurent series of the form f(z) = 1/z + h_1 + h_2 z + h_3 z^2 + ..., the compositional inverse is f^(-1)(z) = 1/z + Prt(1;1,h_1)/z^2 + Prt(2;1,h_1,h_2)/z^3 + ... = 1/z + h_1/z^2 + (h_1^2 + h_2)/z^3 + (h_1^3 + 3 h_1 h_2 + h_3)/z^4 + (h_1^4 + 6 h_1^2 h_2 + 4 h_1 h_3 + 2 h_2^2 + h_4)/z^5 + ... for which the polynomials in the numerators are the partition polynomials of this entry. For example, this formula applied to the q-expansion of Klein's j-invariant / function with coefficients A000521, related to monstrous moonshine, gives the compositional inverse with the coefficients A091406 (see He and Jejjala). - Tom Copeland, Dec 18 2021

The partition polynomials of A350499 'invert' the polynomials of this entry giving the indeterminates h_n. A multinomial formula for the coefficients of the partition polynomials of this entry, equivalent to the multinomial formula presented in the first four sentences of the formula section below, is presented in the MathOverflow question referenced in A350499. - Tom Copeland, Feb 19 2022

The coefficients of the Faber polynomials F(n,b(1),b(2),...,b(n)) (Bouali, p. 52) in the order of the partitions of Abramowitz and Stegun. Compare with A115131 and A210258.

These polynomials occur in discussions of the Virasoro algebra, univalent function spaces and the Schwarzian derivative, symmetric functions, and free probability theory. They are intimately related to symmetric functions, free probability, and Appell sequences through the raising operator R = x - d log(H(D))/dD for the Appell sequence inverse pair associated to the e.g.f.s H(t)e^(xt) (cf. A094587) and (1/H(t))e^(xt) with H(0)=1.

Instances of the Faber polynomials occur in discussions of modular invariants and modular functions in the papers by Asai, Kaneko, and Ninomiya, by Ono and Rolen, and by Zagier. - Tom Copeland, Aug 13 2019

The Faber polynomials, denoted by s_n(a(t)) where a(t) is a formal power series defined by a product formula, are implicitly defined by equation 13.4 on p. 62 of Hazewinkel so as to extract the power sums of the reciprocals of the zeros of a(t). This is the Newton identity expressing the power sum symmetric polynomials in terms of the elementary symmetric polynomials/functions. - Tom Copeland, Jun 06 2020

From Tom Copeland, Oct 15 2020: (Start)

With a_n = n! * b_n = (n-1)! * c_n for n > 0, represent a function with f(0) = a_0 = b_0 = 1 as an

A) exponential generating function (e.g.f), or formal Taylor series: f(x) = e^{a.x} = 1 + Sum_{n > 0} a_n * x^n/n!

B) ordinary generating function (o.g.f.), or formal power series: f(x) = 1/(1-b.x) = 1 + Sum_{n > 0} b_n * x^n

C) logarithmic generating function (l.g.f): f(x) = 1 - log(1 - c.x) = 1 + Sum_{n > 0} c_n * x^n /n.

Expansions of log(f(x)) are given in

I) A127671 and A263634 for the e.g.f: log[ e^{a.*x} ] = e^{L.(a_1,a_2,...)x} = Sum_{n > 0} L_n(a_1,...,a_n) * x^n/n!, the logarithmic polynomials, cumulant expansion polynomials

II) A263916 for the o.g.f.: log[ 1/(1-b.x) ] = log[ 1 - F.(b_1,b_2,...)x ] = -Sum_{n > 0} F_n(b_1,...,b_n) * x^n/n, the Faber polynomials.

Expansions of exp(f(x)-1) are given in

III) A036040 for an e.g.f: exp[ e^{a.x} - 1 ] = e^{BELL.(a_1,...)x}, the Bell/Touchard/exponential partition polynomials, a.k.a. the Stirling partition polynomials of the second kind

IV) A130561 for an o.g.f.: exp[ b.x/(1-b.x) ] = e^{LAH.(b.,...)x}, the Lah partition polynomials

V) A036039 for an l.g.f.: exp[ -log(1-c.x) ] = e^{CIP.(c_1,...)x}, the cycle index polynomials of the symmetric groups S_n, a.k.a. the Stirling partition polynomials of the first kind.

Since exp and log are a compositional inverse pair, one can extract the indeterminates of the log set of partition polynomials from the exp set and vice versa. For a discussion of the relations among these polynomials and the combinatorics of connected and disconnected graphs/maps, see Novak and LaCroix on classical moments and cumulants and the two books on statistical mechanics referenced in A036040. (End)

The order of this array is according to the Abramowitz-Stegun (A-St) ordering of partitions (see A036036).

The row lengths sequence is A000041 (partition numbers) [1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 15, 22, 30, 42, ...].

These numbers are similar to M_0, M_1, M_2, M_3, M_4 given in A111786, A036038, A036039, A036040, A117506, respectively.

Combinatorial interpretation: a(n,k) counts the sets of lists (ordered subsets) obtained from partitioning the set {1..n}, with the lengths of the lists given by the k-th partition of n in A-St order. E.g., a(5,5) is computed from the number of sets of lists of lengths [1^1,2^2] (5th partition of 5 in A-St order). Hence a(5,5) = binomial(5,2)*binomial(3,2) = 5!/(1!*2!) = 60 from partitioning the numbers 1,2,...,5 into sets of lists of the type {[.],[..],[..]}.

This array, called M_3(2), is the k=2 member of a family of partition arrays generalizing A036040 which appears as M_3 = M_3(k=1). S2(2) = A105278 (unsigned Lah number triangle) is related to M_3(2) in the same way as S2(1), the Stirling2 number triangle, is related to M_3(1). - Wolfdieter Lang, Oct 19 2007

Another combinatorial interpretation: a(n,k) enumerates unordered forests of increasing binary trees which are described by the k-th partition of n in the Abramowitz-Stegun order. - Wolfdieter Lang, Oct 19 2007

A relation between partition polynomials formed from these "refined Lah numbers" and Lagrange inversion for an o.g.f. is presented in the link "Lagrange a la Lah" along with an e.g.f. and an umbral binary operator tree representation. - Tom Copeland, Apr 12 2011

With the indeterminates (x_1,x_2,x_3,...) = (t,-c_2*t,-c_3*t,...) with c_n >0, umbrally P(n,a.) = P(n,t)|{t^n = a_n} = 0 and P(j,a.)P(k,a.) = P(j,t)P(k,t)|{t^n =a_n} = d_{j,k} >= 0 is the coefficient of x^j/j!*y^k/k! in the Taylor series expansion of the formal group law FGL(x,y) = f[f^{-1}(x)+f^{-1}(y)], where a_n are the inversion partition polynomials for calculating f(x) from the coefficients of the series expansion of f^{-1}(x) given in A133437. - Tom Copeland, Feb 09 2018

Divided by n!, the row partition polynomials are the elementary homogeneous Schur polynomials presented on p. 44 of the Bracci et al. paper. - Tom Copeland, Jun 04 2018

Also presented (renormalized) as the Schur polynomials on p. 19 of the Konopelchenko and Schief paper with associations to differential operators related to the KP hierarchy. - Tom Copeland, Nov 19 2018

Through equation 4.8 on p. 26 of the Arbarello reference, these polynomials appear in the Hirota bilinear equations 4.7 related to tau-function solutions of the KP hierarchy. - Tom Copeland, Jan 21 2019

These partition polynomials appear as Feynman amplitudes in their Bell polynomial guise (put x_n = n!c_n in A036040 for the indeterminates of the Bell polynomials) in Kreimer and Yeats and Balduf (e.g., p. 27). - Tom Copeland, Dec 17 2019

From Tom Copeland, Oct 15 2020: (Start)

With a_n = n! * b_n = (n-1)! * c_n for n > 0, represent a function with f(0) = a_0 = b_0 = 1 as an

A) exponential generating function (e.g.f), or formal Taylor series: f(x) = e^{a.x} = 1 + Sum_{n > 0} a_n * x^n/n!

B) ordinary generating function (o.g.f.), or formal power series: f(x) = 1/(1-b.x) = 1 + Sum_{n > 0} b_n * x^n

C) logarithmic generating function (l.g.f): f(x) = 1 - log(1 - c.x) = 1 + Sum_{n > 0} c_n * x^n /n.

Expansions of log(f(x)) are given in

I) A127671 and A263634 for the e.g.f: log[ e^{a.*x} ] = e^{L.(a_1,a_2,...)x} = Sum_{n > 0} L_n(a_1,...,a_n) * x^n/n!, the logarithmic polynomials, cumulant expansion polynomials

II) A263916 for the o.g.f.: log[ 1/(1-b.x) ] = log[ 1 - F.(b_1,b_2,...)x ] = -Sum_{n > 0} F_n(b_1,...,b_n) * x^n/n, the Faber polynomials.

Expansions of exp(f(x)-1) are given in

III) A036040 for an e.g.f: exp[ e^{a.x} - 1 ] = e^{BELL.(a_1,...)x}, the Bell/Touchard/exponential partition polynomials, a.k.a. the Stirling partition polynomials of the second kind

IV) A130561 for an o.g.f.: exp[ b.x/(1-b.x) ] = e^{LAH.(b.,...)x}, the Lah partition polynomials

V) A036039 for an l.g.f.: exp[ -log(1-c.x) ] = e^{CIP.(c_1,...)x}, the cycle index polynomials of the symmetric groups S_n, a.k.a. the Stirling partition polynomials of the first kind.

Since exp and log are a compositional inverse pair, one can extract the indeterminates of the log set of partition polynomials from the exp set and vice versa. For a discussion of the relations among these polynomials and the combinatorics of connected and disconnected graphs/maps, see Novak and LaCroix on classical moments and cumulants and the two books on statistical mechanics referenced in A036040. (End)

These partition polynomials are referred to as Schur functions by Segal and Wilson, who present associations with Plucker coordinates, Grassmannians, and the tau functions of the KdV hierarchy. See pages 51 and 61. - Tom Copeland, Jan 08 2022

Connected objects from general (disconnected) objects.

The row lengths of this array is p(n):=A000041(n) (partition numbers).

In row n the partitions of n are taken in the Abramowitz-Stegun order.

One could call the unsigned numbers |a(n,k)| M_5 (similar to M_0, M_1, M_2, M_3 and M_4 given in A111786, A036038, A036039, A036040 and A117506, resp.).

The inverse relation (disconnected from connected objects) is found in A036040.

(d/da(1))p_n[a(1),a(2),...,a(n)] = n b_(n-1)[a(1),a(2),...,a(n-1)], where p_n are the partition polynomials of the cumulant generator A127671 and b_n are the partition polynomials for A133314. - Tom Copeland, Oct 13 2012

See notes on relation to Appell sequences in a differently ordered version of this array A263634. - Tom Copeland, Sep 13 2016

Given a binomial Sheffer polynomial sequence defined by the e.g.f. exp[t * f(x)] = Sum_{n >= 0} p_n(t) * x^n/n!, the cumulants formed from these polynomials are the Taylor series coefficients of f(x) multipied by t. An example is the sequence of the Stirling polynomials of the first kind A008275 with f(x) = log(1+x), so the n-th cumulant is (-1)^(n-1) * (n-1)! * t. - Tom Copeland, Jul 25 2019

From Tom Copeland, Oct 15 2020: (Start)

With a_n = n! * b_n = (n-1)! * c_n for n > 0, represent a function with f(0) = a_0 = b_0 = 1 as an

A) exponential generating function (e.g.f), or formal Taylor series: f(x) = e^{a.x} = 1 + Sum_{n > 0} a_n * x^n/n!

B) ordinary generating function (o.g.f.), or formal power series: f(x) = 1/(1-b.x) = 1 + Sum_{n > 0} b_n * x^n

C) logarithmic generating function (l.g.f): f(x) = 1 - log(1 - c.x) = 1 + Sum_{n > 0} c_n * x^n /n.

Expansions of log(f(x)) are given in

I) A127671 and A263634 for the e.g.f: log[ e^{a.*x} ] = e^{L.(a_1,a_2,...)x} = Sum_{n > 0} L_n(a_1,...,a_n) * x^n/n!, the logarithmic polynomials, cumulant expansion polynomials

II) A263916 for the o.g.f.: log[ 1/(1-b.x) ] = log[ 1 - F.(b_1,b_2,...)x ] = -Sum_{n > 0} F_n(b_1,...,b_n) * x^n/n, the Faber polynomials.

Expansions of exp(f(x)-1) are given in

III) A036040 for an e.g.f: exp[ e^{a.x} - 1 ] = e^{BELL.(a_1,...)x}, the Bell/Touchard/exponential partition polynomials, a.k.a. the Stirling partition polynomials of the second kind

IV) A130561 for an o.g.f.: exp[ b.x/(1-b.x) ] = e^{LAH.(b.,...)x}, the Lah partition polynomials

V) A036039 for an l.g.f.: exp[ -log(1-c.x) ] = e^{CIP.(c_1,...)x}, the cycle index polynomials of the symmetric groups S_n, a.k.a. the Stirling partition polynomials of the first kind.

Since exp and log are a compositional inverse pair, one can extract the indeterminates of the log set of partition polynomials from the exp set and vice versa. For a discussion of the relations among these polynomials and the combinatorics of connected and disconnected graphs/maps, see Novak and LaCroix on classical moments and cumulants and the two books on statistical mechanics referenced in A036040. (End)

Ignoring signs, these polynomials appear in Schröder in the set of equations (II) on p. 343 and in Stewart's translation on p. 31. - Tom Copeland, Aug 25 2021

Previous name: Matrix inverse of A154926.

A000670 appears in the first column. A052882 appears in the second column. A000027 and A045943 appear as diagonals. An alternative to calculating the matrix inverse of A154926 is to move the term in the lower right corner to a position in the same column and calculate the determinant instead, which yields the same answer.

Matrix inverse of (2*I - P), where P is Pascal's triangle and I the identity matrix. See A162312 for the matrix inverse of (2*P - I) and some general remarks about arrays of the form M(a) := (I - a*P)^-1 and their connection with weighted sums of powers of integers. The present array equals (1/2)*M(1/2). - Peter Bala, Jul 01 2009

From Mats Granvik, Aug 11 2009: (Start)

The values in this triangle can be seen as permanents of the Pascal triangle analogous to the method in the Redheffer matrix. The elements satisfy (T(n,k)/T(n,k-1))*k = (T(n-1,k)/T(n,k))*n which converges to log(2) as n->oo and k->0. More generally to calculate log(x) multiply the negative values in A154926 by 1/(x-1) and calculate the matrix inverse. Then (T(n,k)/T(n,k-1))*k and (T(n-1,k)/T(n,k))*n in the resulting triangle converge to log(x).

This method for calculating log(x) converges faster than the Taylor series when x is greater than 5 or so. See chapter on Taylor series in Spiegel for comparison. (End)

Exponential Riordan array [1/(2-exp(x)),x]. - Paul Barry, Apr 06 2011

T(n,k) is the number of ordered set partitions of {1,2,...,n} such that the first block contains k elements. For k=0 the first block contains arbitrarily many elements. - Geoffrey Critzer, Jul 22 2013

A natural (signed) refinement of these polynomials is given by the Appell sequence e.g.f. e^(xt)/ f(t) = exp[tP.(x)] with the formal Taylor series f(x) = 1 + x[1] x + x[2] x^2/2! + ... and with raising operator R = x - d[log(f(D)]/dD (cf. A263634). - Tom Copeland, Nov 06 2015