A336993 List of m such that b(m) has no primitive factor, where {b(m)} is the generalized Lucas sequence defined by b(0) = 0, b(1) = 1 and b(m) = b(m-1) - 2*b(m-2) for m >= 2 (A107920).
1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 12, 13, 18, 30
Offset: 1
Examples
We have b(1) = b(2) = 1 and b(3) = b(5) = b(13) = -1, so obviously b(m) has no primitive factor if m = 1, 2, 3, 5, 13. b(8) = -3 has only one prime factor 3, but 3 divides b(4) = -3, so 8 is a term here. b(12) = 45 has two prime factors 3 and 5, but 3 divides b(4) = -3 and 5 divides b(6) = 5, so 12 is here. b(18) = 85 has two prime factors 5 and 17, but 5 divides b(6) = 5 and 17 divides b(9) = -17, so 18 is here. b(30) = -24475 has three prime factors 5, 11 and 89, but 5 divides b(6) = 5, 11 divides b(10) = -11 and 89 divides b(15) = -89, so 30 is also here. According to Bilu, Hanrot and Voutier, b(m) has at least one primitive factor for any other m (and at least one strongly primitive factor if m != 7).
References
- Paulo Ribenboim, My Numbers, My Friends: Popular Lectures on Number Theory, Springer-Verlag, NY, 2000, p. 18.
Links
- Y. Bilu, G. Hanrot, and P. M. Voutier, Existence of primitive divisors of Lucas and Lehmer numbers, J. reine Angew. Math. 539 (2001), 75--122, a preprint version available from here.
- R. D. Carmichael, On the numerical factors of the arithmetic forms a^n +- b^n, Ann. of Math., 15 (1913), 30--70.
- P. M. Voutier, Primitive divisors of Lucas and Lehmer sequences, Math. Comp. 64 (1995), 869--888.
- M. Yabuta, A simple proof of Carmichael's theorem on primitive divisors, Fibonacci Quart., 39 (2001), 439--443.
Comments