cp's OEIS Frontend

Apart from a sign flip in a(1), the same as A027641.

a(n) is also the numerator of the n-th term of the binomial transform of the sequence of Bernoulli numbers, i.e., of the sequence of fractions A027641(n)/A027642(n).

a(n)/A027642(n) with e.g.f. x/(1-exp(-x)) is the a-sequence for the Sheffer matrix A094645, see the W. Lang link under A006232 for Sheffer a- and z-sequences. - Wolfdieter Lang, Jun 20 2011

a(n)/A027642(n) also give the row sums of the rational triangle of the coefficients of the Bernoulli polynomials A053382/A053383 (falling powers) or A196838/A196839 (rising powers). - Wolfdieter Lang, Oct 25 2011

Given M = the beheaded Pascal's triangle, A074909; with B_n as a vector V, with numerators shown: (1, 1, 1, ...). Then M*V = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ...]. If the sign in a(1) is negative in V, then M*V = [1, 0, 0, 0, ...]. - Gary W. Adamson, Mar 09 2012

One might interpret the term "'original' Bernoulli numbers" as numbers given by the e.g.f. x/(1-exp(-x)). - Peter Luschny, Jun 17 2012

Let B(n) = a(n)/A027642(n) then B(n) = Integral_{x=0..1} F_n(x) where F_n(x) are the signed Fubini polynomials F_n(x) = Sum_{k=0..n} (-1)^n*Stirling2(n,k)*k!*(-x)^k (see illustration). - Peter Luschny, Jan 09 2017

Let M = n X n matrix with (i,j)-th entry a(n+1-j, n+1-i), e.g., if n = 3, M = [1 1 1; 3 1 0; 2 0 0]. Given a sequence s = [s(0)..s(n-1)], let b = [b(0)..b(n-1)] be its inverse binomial transform and let c = [c(0)..c(n-1)] = M^(-1)*transpose(b). Then s(k) = Sum_{i=0..n-1} b(i)*binomial(k,i) = Sum_{i=0..n-1} c(i)*k^i, k=0..n-1. - Gary W. Adamson, Nov 11 2001

From Gary W. Adamson, Aug 09 2008: (Start)

Julius Worpitzky's 1883 algorithm generates Bernoulli numbers.

By way of example [Wikipedia]:

B0 = 1;

B1 = 1/1 - 1/2;

B2 = 1/1 - 3/2 + 2/3;

B3 = 1/1 - 7/2 + 12/3 - 6/4;

B4 = 1/1 - 15/2 + 50/3 - 60/4 + 24/5;

B5 = 1/1 - 31/2 + 180/3 - 390/4 + 360/5 - 120/6;

B6 = 1/1 - 63/2 + 602/3 - 2100/4 + 3360/5 - 2520/6 + 720/7;

...

Note that in this algorithm, odd n's for the Bernoulli numbers sum to 0, not 1, and the sum for B1 = 1/2 = (1/1 - 1/2). B3 = 0 = (1 - 7/2 + 13/3 - 6/4) = 0. The summation for B4 = -1/30. (End)

Pursuant to Worpitzky's algorithm and given M = A028246 as an infinite lower triangular matrix, M * [1/1, -1/2, 1/3, ...] (i.e., the Harmonic series with alternate signs) = the Bernoulli numbers starting [1/1, 1/2, 1/6, ...]. - Gary W. Adamson, Mar 22 2012

From Tom Copeland, Oct 23 2008: (Start)

G(x,t) = 1/(1 + (1-exp(x*t))/t) = 1 + 1 x + (2 + t)*x^2/2! + (6 + 6t + t^2)*x^3/3! + ... gives row polynomials for A090582, the f-polynomials for the permutohedra (see A019538).

G(x,t-1) = 1 + 1*x + (1 + t)*x^2 / 2! + (1 + 4t + t^2)*x^3 / 3! + ... gives row polynomials for A008292, the h-polynomials for permutohedra.

G[(t+1)x,-1/(t+1)] = 1 + (1+ t) x + (1 + 3t + 2 t^2) x^2 / 2! + ... gives row polynomials for the present triangle. (End)

The Worpitzky triangle seems to be an apt name for this triangle. - Johannes W. Meijer, Jun 18 2009

If Pascal's triangle is written as a lower triangular matrix and multiplied by A028246 written as an upper triangular matrix, the product is a matrix where the (i,j)-th term is (i+1)^j. For example,

1,0,0,0 1,1,1, 1 1,1, 1, 1

1,1,0,0 * 0,1,3, 7 = 1,2, 4, 8

1,2,1,0 0,0,2,12 1,3, 9,27

1,3,3,1 0,0,0, 6 1,4,16,64

So, numbering all three matrices' rows and columns starting at 0, the (i,j) term of the product is (i+1)^j. - Jack A. Cohen (ProfCohen(AT)comcast.net), Aug 03 2010

The Fi1 and Fi2 triangle sums are both given by sequence A000670. For the definition of these triangle sums see A180662. The mirror image of the Worpitzky triangle is A130850. - Johannes W. Meijer, Apr 20 2011

Let S_n(m) = 1^m + 2^m + ... + n^m. Then, for n >= 0, we have the following representation of S_n(m) as a linear combination of the binomial coefficients:

S_n(m) = Sum_{i=1..n+1} a(i+n*(n+1)/2)*C(m,i). E.g., S_2(m) = a(4)*C(m,1) + a(5)*C(m,2) + a(6)*C(m,3) = C(m,1) + 3*C(m,2) + 2*C(m,3). - Vladimir Shevelev, Dec 21 2011

Given the set X = [1..n] and 1 <= k <= n, then a(n,k) is the number of sets T of size k of subset S of X such that S is either empty or else contains 1 and another element of X and such that any two elemements of T are either comparable or disjoint. - Michael Somos, Apr 20 2013

Working with the row and column indexing starting at -1, a(n,k) gives the number of k-dimensional faces in the first barycentric subdivision of the standard n-dimensional simplex (apply Brenti and Welker, Lemma 2.1). For example, the barycentric subdivision of the 2-simplex (a triangle) has 1 empty face, 7 vertices, 12 edges and 6 triangular faces giving row 4 of this triangle as (1,7,12,6). Cf. A053440. - Peter Bala, Jul 14 2014

See A074909 and above g.f.s for associations among this array and the Bernoulli polynomials and their umbral compositional inverses. - Tom Copeland, Nov 14 2014

An e.g.f. G(x,t) = exp[P(.,t)x] = 1/t - 1/[t+(1-t)(1-e^(-xt^2))] = (1-t) * x + (-2t + 3t^2 - t^3) * x^2/2! + (6t^2 - 12t^3 + 7t^4 - t^5) * x^3/3! + ... for the shifted, reverse, signed polynomials with the first element nulled, is generated by the infinitesimal generator g(u,t)d/du = [(1-u*t)(1-(1+u)t)]d/du, i.e., exp[x * g(u,t)d/du] u eval. at u=0 generates the polynomials. See A019538 and the G. Rzadkowski link below for connections to the Bernoulli and Eulerian numbers, a Ricatti differential equation, and a soliton solution to the KdV equation. The inverse in x of this e.g.f. is Ginv(x,t) = (-1/t^2)*log{[1-t(1+x)]/[(1-t)(1-tx)]} = [1/(1-t)]x + [(2t-t^2)/(1-t)^2]x^2/2 + [(3t^2-3t^3+t^4)/(1-t)^3]x^3/3 + [(4t^3-6t^4+4t^5-t^6)/(1-t)^4]x^4/4 + ... . The numerators are signed, shifted A135278 (reversed A074909), and the rational functions are the columns of A074909. Also, dG(x,t)/dx = g(G(x,t),t) (cf. A145271). (Analytic G(x,t) added, and Ginv corrected and expanded on Dec 28 2015.) - Tom Copeland, Nov 21 2014

The operator R = x + (1 + t) + t e^{-D} / [1 + t(1-e^(-D))] = x + (1+t) + t - (t+t^2) D + (t+3t^2+2t^3) D^2/2! - ... contains an e.g.f. of the reverse row polynomials of the present triangle, i.e., A123125 * A007318 (with row and column offset 1 and 1). Umbrally, R^n 1 = q_n(x;t) = (q.(0;t)+x)^n, with q_m(0;t) = (t+1)^(m+1) - t^(m+1), the row polynomials of A074909, and D = d/dx. In other words, R generates the Appell polynomials associated with the base sequence A074909. For example, R 1 = q_1(x;t) = (q.(0;t)+x) = q_1(0;t) + q__0(0;t)x = (1+2t) + x, and R^2 1 = q_2(x;t) = (q.(0;t)+x)^2 = q_2(0:t) + 2q_1(0;t)x + q_0(0;t)x^2 = 1+3t+3t^2 + 2(1+2t)x + x^2. Evaluating the polynomials at x=0 regenerates the base sequence. With a simple sign change in R, R generates the Appell polynomials associated with A248727. - Tom Copeland, Jan 23 2015

For a natural refinement of this array, see A263634. - Tom Copeland, Nov 06 2015

From Wolfdieter Lang, Mar 13 2017: (Start)

The e.g.f. E(n, x) for {S(n, m)}{m>=0} with S(n, m) = Sum{k=1..m} k^n, n >= 0, (with undefined sum put to 0) is exp(x)*R(n+1, x) with the exponential row polynomials R(n, x) = Sum_{k=1..n} a(n, k)*x^k/k!. E.g., e.g.f. for n = 2, A000330: exp(x)*(1*x/1!+3*x^2/2!+2*x^3/3!).

The o.g.f. G(n, x) for {S(n, m)}{m >=0} is then found by Laplace transform to be G(n, 1/p) = p*Sum{k=1..n} a(n+1, k)/(p-1)^(2+k).

Hence G(n, x) = x/(1 - x)^(n+2)*Sum_{k=1..n} A008292(n,k)*x^(k-1).

E.g., n=2: G(2, 1/p) = p*(1/(p-1)^2 + 3/(p-1)^3 + 2/(p-1)^4) = p^2*(1+p)/(p-1)^4; hence G(2, x) = x*(1+x)/(1-x)^4.

This works also backwards: from the o.g.f. to the e.g.f. of {S(n, m)}_{m>=0}. (End)

a(n,k) is the number of k-tuples of pairwise disjoint and nonempty subsets of a set of size n. - Dorian Guyot, May 21 2019

From Rajesh Kumar Mohapatra, Mar 16 2020: (Start)

a(n-1,k) is the number of chains of length k in a partially ordered set formed from subsets of an n-element set ordered by inclusion such that the first term of the chains is either the empty set or an n-element set.

Also, a(n-1,k) is the number of distinct k-level rooted fuzzy subsets of an n-set ordered by set inclusion. (End)

The relations on p. 34 of Hasan (also p. 17 of Franco and Hasan) agree with the relation between A019538 and this entry given in the formula section. - Tom Copeland, May 14 2020

T(n,k) is the size of the Green's L-classes in the D-classes of rank (k-1) in the semigroup of partial transformations on an (n-1)-set. - Geoffrey Critzer, Jan 09 2023

T(n,k) is the number of strongly connected binary relations on [n] that have period k (A367948) and index 1. See Theorem 5.4.25(6) in Ki Hang Kim reference. - Geoffrey Critzer, Dec 07 2023

Number of permutations beginning with 21 and avoiding 1-23. - Ralf Stephan, Apr 25 2004

Originally defined as main diagonal of an array of binomial recurrence coefficients (see Gould and Quaintance). Also second-from-right diagonal of triangle A121207.

Starting (1, 3, 9, 31, 121, ...) = row sums of triangle A153868. - Gary W. Adamson, Jan 03 2009

Equals eigensequence of triangle A074909 (reflected). - Gary W. Adamson, Apr 10 2009

The divergent series g(x=1,m) = 1^m*1! - 2^m*2! + 3^m*3! - 4^m*4! + ..., m=>-1, is related to the sequence given above. For m=-1 this series dates back to Euler. We discovered that g(x=1,m) = (-1)^m * (A040027(m) - A000110(m+1) * A073003) with A073003 Gompertz's constant and A000110 the Bell numbers, see A163940; A040027(m = -1) = 0. - Johannes W. Meijer, Oct 16 2009

Compare the o.g.f. to the o.g.f. B(x) of the Bell numbers, where B(x) = 1 + x*B(x/(1-x))/(1-x). - Paul D. Hanna, Mar 23 2012

a(n) is the number of set partitions of {1,2,...,n+1} in which the last block is a singleton: the blocks are arranged in order of their least element. An example is given below. - Peter Bala, Dec 17 2014

T(n,m) is the number of m-faces of a regular n-simplex.

An n-simplex is the n-dimensional analog of a triangle. Specifically, a simplex is the convex hull of a set of (n + 1) affinely independent points in some Euclidean space of dimension n or higher, i.e., a set of points such that no m-plane contains more than (m + 1) of them. Such points are said to be in general position.

Reversing the rows gives A074909, which as a linear sequence is essentially the same as this.

From Tom Copeland, Dec 07 2007: (Start)

T(n,k) * (k+1)! = A068424. The comment on permuted words in A068424 shows that T is related to combinations of letters defined by connectivity of regular polytope simplexes.

If T is the diagonally-shifted Pascal matrix, binomial(n+m, k+m), for m=1, then T is a fundamental type of matrix that is discussed in A133314 and the following hold.

The infinitesimal matrix generator is given by A132681, so T = LM(1) of A132681 with inverse LM(-1).

With a(k) = (-x)^k / k!, T * a = [ Laguerre(n,x,1) ], a vector array with index n for the Laguerre polynomials of order 1. Other formulas for the action of T are given in A132681.

T(n,k) = (1/n!) (D_x)^n (D_t)^k Gf(x,t) evaluated at x=t=0 with Gf(x,t) = exp[ t * x/(1-x) ] / (1-x)^2.

[O.g.f. for T ] = 1 / { [ 1 - t * x/(1-x) ] * (1-x)^2 }. [ O.g.f. for row sums ] = 1 / { (1-x) * (1-2x) }, giving A000225 (without a leading zero) for the row sums. Alternating sign row sums are all 1. [Sign correction noted by Vincent J. Matsko, Jul 19 2015]

O.g.f. for row polynomials = [ (1+q)**(n+1) - 1 ] / [ (1+q) -1 ] = A(1,n+1,q) on page 15 of reference on Grassmann cells in A008292. (End)

Given matrices A and B with A(n,k) = T(n,k)*a(n-k) and B(n,k) = T(n,k)*b(n-k), then A*B = C where C(n,k) = T(n,k)*[a(.)+b(.)]^(n-k), umbrally. The e.g.f. for the row polynomials of A is {(a+t) exp[(a+t)x] - a exp(a x)}/t, umbrally. - Tom Copeland, Aug 21 2008

A007318*A097806 as infinite lower triangular matrices. - Philippe Deléham, Feb 08 2009

Riordan array (1/(1-x)^2, x/(1-x)). - Philippe Deléham, Feb 22 2012

The elements of the matrix inverse are T^(-1)(n,k)=(-1)^(n+k)*T(n,k). - R. J. Mathar, Mar 12 2013

Relation to K-theory: T acting on the column vector (-0,d,-d^2,d^3,...) generates the Euler classes for a hypersurface of degree d in CP^n. Cf. Dugger p. 168 and also A104712, A111492, and A238363. - Tom Copeland, Apr 11 2014

Number of walks of length p>0 between any two distinct vertices of the complete graph K_(n+2) is W(n+2,p)=(-1)^(p-1)*Sum_{k=0..p-1} T(p-1,k)*(-n-2)^k = ((n+1)^p - (-1)^p)/(n+2) = (-1)^(p-1)*Sum_{k=0..p-1} (-n-1)^k. This is equal to (-1)^(p-1)*Phi(p,-n-1), where Phi is the cyclotomic polynomial when p is an odd prime. For K_3, see A001045; for K_4, A015518; for K_5, A015521; for K_6, A015531; for K_7, A015540. - Tom Copeland, Apr 14 2014

Consider the transformation 1 + x + x^2 + x^3 + ... + x^n = A_0*(x-1)^0 + A_1*(x-1)^1 + A_2*(x-1)^2 + ... + A_n*(x-1)^n. This sequence gives A_0, ..., A_n as the entries in the n-th row of this triangle, starting at n = 0. - Derek Orr, Oct 14 2014

See A074909 for associations among this array, the Bernoulli polynomials and their umbral compositional inverses, and the face polynomials of permutahedra and their duals (cf. A019538). - Tom Copeland, Nov 14 2014

From Wolfdieter Lang, Dec 10 2015: (Start)

A(r, n) = T(n+r-2, r-1) = risefac(n,r)/r! = binomial(n+r-1, r), for n >= 1 and r >= 1, gives the array with the number of independent components of a symmetric tensors of rank r (number of indices) and dimension n (indices run from 1 to n). Here risefac(n, k) is the rising factorial.

As(r, n) = T(n+1, r+1) = fallfac(n, r)/r! = binomial(n, r), r >= 1 and n >= 1 (with the triangle entries T(n, k) = 0 for n < k) gives the array with the number of independent components of an antisymmetric tensor of rank r and dimension n. Here fallfac is the falling factorial. (End)

The h-vectors associated to these f-vectors are given by A000012 regarded as a lower triangular matrix. Read as bivariate polynomials, the h-polynomials are the complete homogeneous symmetric polynomials in two variables, found in the compositional inverse of an e.g.f. for A008292, the h-vectors of the permutahedra. - Tom Copeland, Jan 10 2017

For a correlation between the states of a quantum system and the combinatorics of the n-simplex, see Boya and Dixit. - Tom Copeland, Jul 24 2017

Let M(t) = exp(t*T) = lim_{n->oo} (1 + t*T/n)^n.

Pascal matrix = [ binomial(n,k) ] = M(1) = exp(T), truncating the series gives the n X n submatrices.

Inverse Pascal matrix = M(-1) = exp(-T) = matrix for inverse binomial transform.

A(j) = T^j / j! equals the matrix [binomial(n,k) * delta(n-k-j)] where delta(n) = 1 if n=0 and vanishes otherwise (Kronecker delta); i.e., A(j) is a matrix with all the terms 0 except for the j-th lower (or main for j=0) diagonal, which equals that of the Pascal triangle. Hence the A(j)'s form a linearly independent basis for all matrices of the form [binomial(n,k) * d(n-k)] which include as a subset the invertible associated matrices of the list partition transform (LPT) of A133314.

For sequences with b(0) = 1, umbrally,

M[b(.)] = exp(b(.)*T) = [ binomial(n,k) * b(n-k) ] = matrices associated to b by LPT.

[M[b(.)]]^(-1) = exp(c(.)*T) = [ binomial(n,k) * c(n-k) ] = matrices associated to c, where c = LPT(b) . Or,

[M[b(.)]]^(-1) = exp[LPT(b(.))*T] = LPT[M(b(.))] = M[LPT(b(.))]= M[c(.)].

This is related to xDx, the iterated Laguerre transform and the general Euler transformation of a sequence through the comments in A132013 and A132014 and the relation [Sum_{k=0..n} binomial(n,k) * b(n-k) * d(k)] = M(b)*d, (n-th term). See also A132382.

If b(n,x) is a binomial type Sheffer sequence, then M[b(.,x)]*s(y) = s(x+y) when s(y) = (s(0,y),s(1,y),s(2,y),...) is an array for a Sheffer sequence with the same delta operator as b(n,x) and [M[b(.,x)]]^(-1) is given by the formulas above with b(n) replaced by b(n,x) as b(0,x)=1 for a binomial-type Sheffer sequence.

T = I - A132013 and conversely A132013 = I - T, which is the matrix representation for the iterated mixed order Laguerre transform characterized in A132013 (and A132014).

(I-T)^m generates the group [A132013]^m for m = 0,1,2,... discussed in A132014.

The inverse is 1/(I-T) = I + T + T^2 + T^3 + ... = [A132013]^(-1) = A094587 with the associated sequence (0!,1!,2!,3!,...) under the LPT.

And 1/(I-T)^2 = I + 2*T + 3*T^2 + 4*T^3 + ... = [A132013]^(-2) = A132159 with the associated sequence (1!,2!,3!,4!,...) under the LPT.

The matrix operation b = T*a can be characterized in several ways in terms of the coefficients a(n) and b(n), their o.g.f.'s A(x) and B(x), or e.g.f.'s EA(x) and EB(x).

1) b(0) = 0, b(n) = n * a(n-1),

2) B(x) = xDx A(x)

3) B(x) = x * Lag(1,-:xD:) A(x)

4) EB(x) = x * EA(x) where D is the derivative w.r.t. x, (:xD:)^j = x^j*D^j and Lag(n,x) is the Laguerre polynomial.

So the exponentiated operator can be characterized as

5) exp(t*T) A(x) = exp(t*xDx) A(x) = [Sum_{n=0,1,...} (t*x)^n * Lag(n,-:xD:)] A(x) = [exp{[t*u/(1-t*u)]*:xD:} / (1-t*u) ] A(x) (eval. at u=x) = A[x/(1-t*x)]/(1-t*x), a generalized Euler transformation for an o.g.f.,

6) exp(t*T) EA(x) = exp(t*x)*EA(x) = exp[(t+a(.))*x], gen. Euler trf. for an e.g.f.

7) exp(t*T) * a = M(t) * a = [Sum_{k=0..n} binomial(n,k) * t^(n-k) * a(k)].

The umbral extension of formulas 5, 6 and 7 gives formally

8) exp[c(.)*T] A(x) = exp(c(.)*xDx) A(x) = [Sum_{n>=0} (c(.)*x)^n * Lag(n,-:xD:)] A(x) = [exp{[c(.)*u/(1-c(.)*u)]*:xD:} / (1-c(.)*u) ] A(x) (eval. at u=x) = A[x/(1-c(.)*x)]/(1-c(.)*x), where the umbral evaluation should be applied only after a power series in c is obtained,

9) exp[c(.)*T] EA(x) = exp(c(.)*x)*EA(x) = exp[(c(.)+a(.))*x]

10) exp[c(.)*T] * a = M[c(.)] * a = [Sum_{k=0..n} binomial(n,k) * c(n-k) * a(k)] .

The n X n principal submatrix of T is nilpotent, in particular, [Tsub_n]^(n+1) = 0, n=0,1,2,3,....

Note (xDx)^n = x^n D^n x^n = x^n n! (:Dx:)^n/n! = x^n n! Lag(n,-:xD:).

The operator xDx is an important, classical operator explored by among others Dattoli, Al-Salam, Carlitz and Stokes and even earlier investigators.

For a recent treatment of xDx, DxD and more general operators see the paper "Laguerre-type derivatives: Dobinski relations and combinatorial identities". - Karol A. Penson, Sep 15 2009

See Copeland's link for generalized Laguerre functions and connection to fractional differ-integrals in exercises through (:Dx:)^a/a!=(D^a x^a)/a!. - Tom Copeland, Nov 17 2011

From Tom Copeland, Apr 25 2014: (Start)

Conjugation or "similarity" transformations of [dP]=A132440 have an operator interpretation (cf. A074909 and A238363):

In general, select two operators A and B such that A^n = F1(n,B) and B^n = F2(n,A); then A^n = F1(n,F2(.,A)) and B^n = F2(n,F1(.,B)), evaluated umbrally, i.e., F1(n,F2(.,x))=F2(n,F1(.,x))=x^n, implying the polynomials F1 and F2 are an umbral compositional inverse pair.

One such pair are the Bell polynomials Bell(n,x) and falling factorials (x)_n with Bell(n,:xD:)=(xD)^n and (xD)_n=:xD:^n (cf. A074909). Another are the Laguerre polynomials LN(n,x)= n!*Lag(n,x) (A021009), which are umbrally self-inverse, with LN(n,-:xD:)=:Dx:^n and LN(n,:Dx:)= (-:xD:)^n with :Dx:^n=D^n*x^n.

Evaluating, for n>=0, the operator derivative d(B^n)/dA = d(F2(n,A))/dA in the basis B^n, i.e., with A^n finally replaced by F1(n,B), or A^n=F1(.,B)^n=F1(n,B), is equivalent to the matrix conjugation

A) [F2]*[dP]*[F1]

B) = [F2]*[dP]*[F2]^(-1)

C) = [F1]^(-1)*[dP]*[F1],

where [F1] is the lower triangular matrix with the n-th row the coefficients of F1(n,x) and analogously for [F2].

So, given the row vector Rv=(c0 c1 c2 c3 ...) and the column vector Cv(x)=(1 x x^2 x^3 ...)^Transpose, form the power series V(x)=Rv*Cv(x).

D) dV(B)/dA = Rv * [F2]*[dP]*[F1] * Cv(B).

E) With A=D and B=D, F1(n,x)=F2(n,x)=x^n and [F1]=[F2]=I. Then d(B^n)/dA = d(D^n)/dD = n * D^(n-1); therefore, consistently [F2]*[dP]*[F1] = [dP] and dV(D)/dD = Rv * [dP] * Cv(D). (End)

Row sums: A006318 (Schroeder numbers). Essentially same as triangle A060693 transposed.

T(n,k) is number of Schroeder paths (i.e., consisting of steps U=(1,1), D=(1,-1), H=(2,0) and never going below the x-axis) from (0,0) to (2n,0), having k U's. E.g., T(2,1)=3 because we have UHD, UDH and HUD. - Emeric Deutsch, Dec 06 2003

Little Schroeder numbers A001003 have a(n) = Sum_{k=0..n} A088617(n,k)*(-1)^(n-k)*2^k. - Paul Barry, May 24 2005

Conjecture: The expected number of U's in a Schroeder n-path is asymptotically Sqrt[1/2]*n for large n. - David Callan, Jul 25 2008

T(n, k) is also the number of order-preserving and order-decreasing partial transformations (of an n-chain) of width k (width(alpha) = |Dom(alpha)|). - Abdullahi Umar, Oct 02 2008

The antidiagonals of this lower triangular matrix are the rows of A055151. - Tom Copeland, Jun 17 2015

T(n+3, k) is also the number of compatible k-sets of cluster variables in Fomin and Zelevinsky's cluster algebra of finite type A_n. Take a row of this triangle regarded as a polynomial in x and rewrite as a polynomial in y := x+1. The coefficients of the polynomial in y give a row of the triangle of Narayana numbers A001263. For example, x^2 + 5*x + 5 = y^2 + 3*y + 1. - Paul Boddington, Mar 07 2003

Number of standard Young tableaux of shape (k+1,k+1,1^(n-k-3)), where 1^(n-k-3) denotes a sequence of n-k-3 1's (see the Stanley reference).

Number of k-dimensional 'faces' of the n-dimensional associahedron (see Simion, p. 168). - Mitch Harris, Jan 16 2007

Mirror image of triangle A126216. - Philippe Deléham, Oct 19 2007

For relation to Lagrange inversion or series reversion and the geometry of associahedra or Stasheff polytopes (and other combinatorial objects) see A133437. - Tom Copeland, Sep 29 2008

Row generating polynomials 1/(n+1)*Jacobi_P(n,1,1,2*x+1). Row n of this triangle is the f-vector of the simplicial complex dual to an associahedron of type A_n [Fomin & Reading, p. 60]. See A001263 for the corresponding array of h-vectors for associahedra of type A_n. See A063007 and A080721 for the f-vectors for associahedra of type B and type D respectively. - Peter Bala, Oct 28 2008

f-vectors of secondary polytopes for Grobner bases for optimization and integer programming (see De Loera et al. and Thomas). - Tom Copeland, Oct 11 2011

From Devadoss and O'Rourke's book: The Fulton-MacPherson compactification of the configuration space of n free particles on a line segment with a fixed particle at each end is the n-Dim Stasheff associahedron whose refined f-vector is given in A133437 which reduces to A033282. - Tom Copeland, Nov 29 2011

Diagonals of A132081 are rows of A033282. - Tom Copeland, May 08 2012

The general results on the convolution of the refined partition polynomials of A133437, with u_1 = 1 and u_n = -t otherwise, can be applied here to obtain results of convolutions of these polynomials. - Tom Copeland, Sep 20 2016

The signed triangle t(n, k) =(-1)^k* T(n+2, k-1), n >= 1, k = 1..n, seems to be obtainable from the partition array A111785 (in Abramowitz-Stegun order) by adding the entries corresponding to the partitions of n with the number of parts k. E.g., triangle t, row n=4: -1, (6+3) = 9, -21, 14. - Wolfdieter Lang, Mar 17 2017

The preceding conjecture by Lang is true. It is implicit in Copeland's 2011 comments in A086810 on the relations among a gf and its compositional inverse for that entry and inversion through A133437 (a differently normalized version of A111785), whose integer partitions are the same as those for A134685. (An inversion pair in Copeland's 2008 formulas below can also be used to prove the conjecture.) In addition, it follows from the relation between the inversion formula of A111785/A133437 and the enumeration of distinct faces of associahedra. See the MathOverflow link concernimg Loday and the Aguiar and Ardila reference in A133437 for proofs of the relations between the partition polynomials for inversion and enumeration of the distinct faces of the A_n associahedra, or Stasheff polytopes. - Tom Copeland, Dec 21 2017

The rows seem to give (up to sign) the coefficients in the expansion of the integer-valued polynomial (x+1)*(x+2)^2*(x+3)^2*...*(x+n)^2*(x+n+1)/(n!*(n+1)!) in the basis made of the binomial(x+i,i). - F. Chapoton, Oct 07 2022

Chapoton's observation above is correct: the precise expansion is (x+1)*(x+2)^2*(x+3)^2*...*(x+n)^2*(x+n+1)/ (n!*(n+1)!) = Sum_{k = 0..n-1} (-1)^k*T(n+2,n-k-1)*binomial(x+2*n-k,2*n-k), as can be verified using the WZ algorithm. For example, n = 4 gives (x+1)*(x+2)^2*(x+3)^2*(x+4)^2*(x+5)/(4!*5!) = 14*binomial(x+8,8) - 21*binomial(x+7,7) + 9*binomial(x+6,6) - binomial(x+5,5). - Peter Bala, Jun 24 2023

Coefficients are listed in Abramowitz and Stegun order (A036036).

Given an invertible function f(t) analytic about t=0 (or a formal power series) with f(0)=0 and Df(0) not equal to 0, form h(t) = t / f(t) and let h_n denote the coefficient of t^n in h(t).

Lagrange inversion gives the compositional inverse about t=0 as g(t) = Sum_{j>=1} ( t^j * (1/j) * Sum_{permutations s with s(1) + s(2) + ... + s(j) = j - 1} h_s(1) * h_s(2) * ... * h_s(j) ) = t * T(1,1) * h_0 + Sum_{j>=2} ( t^j * Sum_{k=1..(# of partitions for j-1)} T(j,k) * H(j-1,k ; h_0,h_1,...) ), where H(j-1,k ; h_0,h_1,...) is the k-th partition for h_1 through h_(j-1) corresponding to n=j-1 on page 831 of Abramowitz and Stegun (ordered as in A&S) with (h_0)^(j-m)=(h_0)^(n+1-m) appended to each partition subsumed under n and m of A&S.

Denoting h_n by (n') for brevity, to 8th order in t,

g(t) = t * (0')

+ t^2 * [ (0') (1') ]

+ t^3 * [ (0')^2 (2') + (0') (1')^2 ]

+ t^4 * [ (0')^3 (3') + 3 (0')^2 (1') (2') + (0') (1')^3 ]

+ t^5 * [ (0')^4 (4') + 4 (0')^3 (1') (3') + 2 (0')^3 (2')^2 + 6 (0')^2 (1')^2 (2') + (0') (1')^4 ]

+ t^6 * [ (0')^5 (5') + 5 (0')^4 (1') (4') + 5 (0')^4 (2') (3') + 10 (0')^3 (1')^2 (3') + 10 (0')^3 (1') (2')^2 + 10 (0')^2 (1')^3 (2') + (0') (1')^5 ]

+ t^7 * [ (0')^6 (6') + 6 (0')^5 (1') (5') + 6 (0')^5 (2') (4') + 3 (0')^5 (3')^2 + 15 (0')^4 (1')^2 (4') + 30 (0')^4 (1') (2') (3') + 5 (0')^4 (2')^3 + 20 (0')^3 (1')^3 (3') + 30 (0')^3 (1')^2 (2')^2 + 15 (0')^2 (1')^4 (2') + (0') (1')^6]

+ t^8 * [ (0')^7 (7') + 7 (0')^6 (1') (6') + 7 (0')^6 (2') (5') + 7 (0')^6 (3') (4') + 21 (0')^5 (1')^2* (5') + 42 (0')^5 (1') (2') (4') + 21 (0')^5 (1') (3')^2 + 21 (0')^5 (2')^2 (3') + 35 (0')^4 (1')^3 (4') + 105 (0)^4 (1')^2 (2') (3') + 35 (0')^4 (1') (2')^3 + 35 (0')^3 (1')^4 (3') + 70 (0')^3 (1')^3 (2')^2 + 21 (0')^2 (1')^5 (2') + (0') (1')^7 ]

+ ..., where from the formula section, for example, T(8,1',2',...,7') = 7! / ((8 - (1'+ 2' + ... + 7'))! * 1'! * 2'! * ... * 7'!) are the coefficients of the integer partitions (1')^1' (2')^2' ... (7')^7' in the t^8 term.

A125181 is an extended, reordered version of the above sequence, omitting the leading 1, with alternate interpretations.

If the coefficients of partitions with the same exponent for h_0 are summed within rows, A001263 is obtained, omitting the leading 1.

From identification of the elements of the inversion with those on page 25 of the Ardila et al. link, the coefficients of the irregular table enumerate non-crossing partitions on [n]. - Tom Copeland, Oct 13 2014

From Tom Copeland, Oct 28-29 2014: (Start)

Operating with d/d(1') = d/d(h_1) on the n-th partition polynomial Prt(n;h_0,h_1,..,h_n) in square brackets above associated with t^(n+1) generates n * Prt(n-1;h_0,h_1,..,h_(n-1)); therefore, the polynomials are an Appell sequence of polynomials in the indeterminate h_1 when h_0=1 (a special type of Sheffer sequence).

Consequently, umbrally, [Prt(.;1,x,h_2,..) + y]^n = Prt(n;1,x+y,h_2,..); that is, Sum_{k=0..n} binomial(n,k) * Prt(k;1,x,h_2,..) * y^(n-k) = Prt(n;1,x+y,h_2,..).

Or, e^(x*z) * exp[Prt(.;1,0,h_2,..) * z] = exp[Prt(.;1,x,h_2,..) * z]. Then with x = h_1 = -(1/2) * d^2[f(t)]/dt^2 evaluated at t=0, the formal Laplace transform from z to 1/t of this expression generates g(t), the comp. inverse of f(t), when h_0 = 1 = df(t)/dt eval. at t=0.

I.e., t / (1 - t*(x + Prt(.;1,0,h_2,..))) = t / (1 - t*Prt(.;1,x,h_2,..)) = g(t), interpreted umbrally, when h_0 = 1.

(End)

Connections to and between arrays associated to the Catalan (A000108 and A007317), Riordan (A005043), Fibonacci (A000045), and Fine (A000957) numbers and to lattice paths, e.g., the Motzkin, Dyck, and Łukasiewicz, can be made explicit by considering the inverse in x of the o.g.f. of A104597(x,-t), i.e., f(x) = P(Cinv(x),t-1) = Cinv(x) / (1 + (t-1)*Cinv(x)) = x*(1-x) / (1 + (t-1)*x*(1-x)) = (x-x^2) / (1 + (t-1)*(x-x^2)), where Cinv(x) = x*(1-x) is the inverse of C(x) = (1 - sqrt(1-4*x)) / 2, a shifted o.g.f. for the Catalan numbers, and P(x,t) = x / (1+t*x) with inverse Pinv(x,t) = -P(-x,t) = x / (1-t*x). Then h(x,t) = x / f(x,t) = x * (1+(t-1)Cinv(x)) / Cinv(x) = 1 + t*x + x^2 + x^3 + ..., i.e., h_1=t and all other coefficients are 1, so the inverse of f(x,t) in x, which is explicitly in closed form finv(x,t) = C(Pinv(x,t-1)), is given by A091867, whose coefficients are sums of the refined Narayana numbers above obtained by setting h_1=(1')=t in the partition polynomials and all other coefficients to one. The group generators C(x) and P(x,t) and their inverses allow associations to be easily made between these classic number arrays. - Tom Copeland, Nov 03 2014

From Tom Copeland, Nov 10 2014: (Start)

Inverting in x with t a parameter, let F(x;t,n) = x - t*x^(n+1). Then h(x) = x / F(x;t,n) = 1 / (1-t*x^n) = 1 + t*x^n + t^2*x^(2n) + t^3*x^(3n) + ..., so h_k vanishes unless k = m*n with m an integer in which case h_k = t^m.

Finv(x;t,n) = Sum_{j>=0} {binomial((n+1)*j,j) / (n*j + 1)} * t^j * x^(n*j + 1), which gives the Catalan numbers for n=1, and the Fuss-Catalan sequences for n>1 (see A001764, n=2). [Added braces to disambiguate the formula. - N. J. A. Sloane, Oct 20 2015]

This relation reveals properties of the partitions and sums of the coefficients of the array. For n=1, h_k = t^k for all k, implying that the row sums are the Catalan numbers. For n = 2, h_k for k odd vanishes, implying that there are no blocks with only even-indexed h_k on the even-numbered rows and that only the blocks containing only even-sized bins contribute to the odd-row sums giving the Fuss-Catalan numbers for n=2. And so on, for n > 2.

These relations are reflected in any combinatorial structures enumerated by this array and the partitions, such as the noncrossing partitions depicted for a five-element set (a pentagon) in Wikipedia.

(End)

From Tom Copeland, Nov 12 2014: (Start)

An Appell sequence possesses an umbral inverse sequence (cf. A249548). The partition polynomials here, Prt(n;1,h_1,...), are an Appell sequence in the indeterminate h_1=u, so have an e.g.f. exp[Prt(.;1,u,h_2...)*t] = e^(u*t) * exp[Prt(.;1,0,h2,...)*t] with umbral inverses with an e.g.f e^(-u*t) / exp[Prt(.;1,0,h2,...)*t]. This makes contact with the formalism of A133314 (cf. also A049019 and A019538) and the signed, refined face partition polynomials of the permutahedra (or their duals), which determine the reciprocal of exp[Prt(.,0,u,h2...)*t] (cf. A249548) or exp[Prt(.;1,u,h2,...)*t], forming connections among the combinatorics of permutahedra and the noncrossing partitions, Dyck paths and trees (cf. A125181), and many other important structures isomorphic to the partitions of this entry, as well as to formal cumulants through A127671 and algebraic structures of Lie algebras. (Cf. relationship of permutahedra with the Eulerians A008292.)

(End)

From Tom Copeland, Nov 24 2014: (Start)

The n-th row multiplied by n gives the number of terms in the homogeneous symmetric monomials generated by [x(1) + x(2) + ... + x(n+1)]^n under the umbral mapping x(m)^j = h_j, for any m. E.g., [a + b + c]^2 = [a^2 + b^2 + c^2] + 2 * [a*b + a*c + b*c] is mapped to [3 * h_2] + 2 * [3 * h_1^2], and 3 * A134264(3) = 3 *(1,1)= (3,3) the number of summands in the two homogeneous polynomials in the square brackets. For n=3, [a + b + c + d]^3 = [a^3 + b^3 + ...] + 3 [a*b^2 + a*c^2 + ...] + 6 [a*b*c + a*c*d + ...] maps to [4 * h_3] + 3 [12 * h_1 * h_2] + 6 [4 * (h_1)^3], and the number of terms in the brackets is given by 4 * A134264(4) = 4 * (1,3,1) = (4,12,4).

The further reduced expression is 4 h_3 + 36 h_1 h_2 + 24 (h_1)^3 = A248120(4) with h_0 = 1. The general relation is n * A134264(n) = A248120(n) / A036038(n-1) where the arithmetic is performed on the coefficients of matching partitions in each row n.

Abramowitz and Stegun give combinatorial interpretations of A036038 and relations to other number arrays.

This can also be related to repeated umbral composition of Appell sequences and topology with the Bernoulli numbers playing a special role. See the Todd class link.

(End)

These partition polynomials are dubbed the Voiculescu polynomials on page 11 of the He and Jejjala link. - Tom Copeland, Jan 16 2015

See page 5 of the Josuat-Verges et al. reference for a refinement of these partition polynomials into a noncommutative version composed of nondecreasing parking functions. - Tom Copeland, Oct 05 2016

(Per Copeland's Oct 13 2014 comment.) The number of non-crossing set partitions whose block sizes are the parts of the n-th integer partition, where the ordering of integer partitions is first by total, then by length, then lexicographically by the reversed sequence of parts. - Gus Wiseman, Feb 15 2019

With h_0 = 1 and the other h_n replaced by suitably signed partition polynomials of A263633, the refined face partition polynomials for the associahedra of normalized A133437 with a shift in indices are obtained (cf. In the Realm of Shadows). - Tom Copeland, Sep 09 2019

Number of primitive parking functions associated to each partition of n. See Lemma 3.8 on p. 28 of Rattan. - Tom Copeland, Sep 10 2019

With h_n = n + 1, the d_k (A006013) of Table 2, p. 18, of Jong et al. are obtained, counting the n-point correlation functions in a quantum field theory. - Tom Copeland, Dec 25 2019

By inspection of the diagrams on Robert Dickau's website, one can see the relationship between the monomials of this entry and the connectivity of the line segments of the noncrossing partitions. - Tom Copeland, Dec 25 2019

Speicher has examples of the first four inversion partition polynomials on pp. 22 and 23 with his k_n equivalent to h_n = (n') here with h_0 = 1. Identifying z = t, C(z) = t/f(t) = h(t), and M(z) = f^(-1)(t)/t, then statement (3), on p. 43, of Theorem 3.26, C(z M(z)) = M(z), is equivalent to substituting f^(-1)(t) for t in t/f(t), and statement (4), M(z/C(z)) = C(z), to substituting f(t) for t in f^(-1)(t)/t. - Tom Copeland, Dec 08 2021

Given a Laurent series of the form f(z) = 1/z + h_1 + h_2 z + h_3 z^2 + ..., the compositional inverse is f^(-1)(z) = 1/z + Prt(1;1,h_1)/z^2 + Prt(2;1,h_1,h_2)/z^3 + ... = 1/z + h_1/z^2 + (h_1^2 + h_2)/z^3 + (h_1^3 + 3 h_1 h_2 + h_3)/z^4 + (h_1^4 + 6 h_1^2 h_2 + 4 h_1 h_3 + 2 h_2^2 + h_4)/z^5 + ... for which the polynomials in the numerators are the partition polynomials of this entry. For example, this formula applied to the q-expansion of Klein's j-invariant / function with coefficients A000521, related to monstrous moonshine, gives the compositional inverse with the coefficients A091406 (see He and Jejjala). - Tom Copeland, Dec 18 2021

The partition polynomials of A350499 'invert' the polynomials of this entry giving the indeterminates h_n. A multinomial formula for the coefficients of the partition polynomials of this entry, equivalent to the multinomial formula presented in the first four sentences of the formula section below, is presented in the MathOverflow question referenced in A350499. - Tom Copeland, Feb 19 2022

The third row is (n^4 - n^2 + 24*n + 24)/12.

For a closed-form formula for generalized Pascal's triangle see A228576. - Boris Putievskiy, Sep 04 2013

Suppose that p = p(n)*x^n + p(n-1)*x^(n-1) + ... + p(1)*x + p(0) is a polynomial and that Q is a sequence of polynomials:

...

q(k,x) = t(k,0)*x^k + t(k,1)*x^(k-1) + ... + t(k,k-1)*x + t(k,k),

...

for k = 0, 1, 2, ... The Q-downstep of p is the polynomial given by

...

D(p) = p(n)*q(n-1,x) + p(n-1)*q(n-2,x) + ... + p(1)*q(0,x). (Note that p(0) does not appear. "Q-downstep" as just defined differs slightly from "Q-downstep" as defined for a different purpose at A193649.)

...

Now suppose that P = (p(n,x): n >= 0) and Q = (q(n,x): n >= 0) are sequences of polynomials, where n indicates degree. The fission of P by Q, denoted by P^^Q, is introduced here as the sequence W = (w(n,x): n >= 0) of polynomials defined by w(0,x) = 1 and w(n,x) = D(p(n+1,x)).

...

Strictly speaking, ^^ is an operation on sequences of polynomials. However, if P and Q are regarded as numerical triangles (of coefficients of polynomials), then ^^ can be regarded as an operation on numerical triangles. In this case, row n of P^^Q, for n > 0, is given by the matrix product P(n+1)*QQ(n), where P(n+1) =(p(n+1,n+1), p(n+1,n), ..., p(n+1,2), p(n+1,1)) and QQ(n) is the (n+1)-by-(n+1) matrix given by

...

q(n,0) .. q(n,1)............. q(n,n-1) .... q(n,n)

0 ....... q(n-1,0)........... q(n-1,n-2)... q(n-1,n-1)

0 ....... 0.................. q(n-2,n-3) .. q(n-2,n-2)

...

0 ....... 0.................. q(1,0) ...... q(1,1)

0 ....... 0 ................. 0 ........... q(0,0).

Here, the polynomial q(k,x) is taken to be

q(k,0)*x^k + q(k,1)x^(k-1) + ... + q(k,k)*x + q(k,k);

i.e., "q" is used instead of "t".

...

Example: Let p(n,x) = (x+1)^n and q(n,x) = (x+2)^n. Then

...

w(0,x) = 1 by the definition of W,

w(1,x) = D(p(2,x)) = 1*(x+2) + 2*1 = x + 4,

w(2,x) = D(p(3,x)) = 1*(x^2+4*x+4) + 3*(x+2) + 3*1 = x^2 + 7*x + 13,

w(3,x) = D(p(4,x)) = 1*(x^3+6*x^2+12*x+8) + 4*(x^2+4x+4) + 6*(x+2) + 4*1 = x^3 + 10*x^2 + 34*x + 40.

...

From these first 4 polynomials in the sequence P^^Q, we can write the first 4 rows of P^^Q when P, Q, and P^^Q are regarded as triangles:

1

1...4

1...7....13

1...10...34...40

...

In the following examples, r(P^^Q) is the mirror of P^^Q, obtained by reversing the rows of P^^Q. Let u denote the polynomial x^n + x^(n-1) + ... + x + 1.

...

..P........Q...........P^^Q........r(P^^Q)

(x+1)^n....(x+2)^n.....A193842.....A193843

(x+1)^n....(x+1)^n.....A193844.....A193845

(x+2)^n....(x+1)^n.....A193846.....A193847

(2x+1)^n...(x+1)^n.....A193856.....A193857

(x+1)^n....(2x+1)^n....A193858.....A193859

(x+1)^n.......u........A054143.....A104709

..u........(x+1)^n.....A074909.....A074909

..u...........u........A002260.....A004736

(x+2)^n.......u........A193850.....A193851

..u.........(x+2)^n....A193844.....A193845

(2x+1)^n......u........A193860.....A193861

..u.........(2x+1)^n...A115068.....A193862

...

Regarding A193842,

col 1 ...... A000012

col 2 ...... A016777

col 3 ...... A081271

w(n,n) ..... A003462

w(n,n-1) ... A014915