A034695 Tau_6 (the 6th Piltz divisor function), the number of ordered 6-factorizations of n; Dirichlet convolution of number-of-divisors function (A000005) with A007426.
1, 6, 6, 21, 6, 36, 6, 56, 21, 36, 6, 126, 6, 36, 36, 126, 6, 126, 6, 126, 36, 36, 6, 336, 21, 36, 56, 126, 6, 216, 6, 252, 36, 36, 36, 441, 6, 36, 36, 336, 6, 216, 6, 126, 126, 36, 6, 756, 21, 126, 36, 126, 6, 336, 36, 336, 36, 36, 6, 756, 6, 36, 126, 462, 36, 216, 6, 126
Offset: 1
References
- T. M. Apostol, Introduction to Analytic Number Theory, Springer-Verlag, 1976, pages 29 and 38
- Leveque, William J., Fundamentals of Number Theory. New York:Dover Publications, 1996, ISBN 9780486689067, p .167-Exercise 5.b.
Links
- Seiichi Manyama, Table of n, a(n) for n = 1..10000 (terms 1..1000 from Enrique Pérez Herrero)
- E. Pérez Herrero, Piltz Divisor functions (1), Psychedelic Geometry Blogspot, Dec 21 2009.
- E. Pérez Herrero, Piltz Divisor functions (2), Psychedelic Geometry Blogspot, Dec 24 2009.
Crossrefs
Programs
-
Mathematica
tau[n_, 1] = 1; tau[n_, k_] := tau[n, k] = Plus @@ (tau[ #, k - 1] & /@ Divisors[n]); Table[ tau[n, 6], {n, 68}] (* Robert G. Wilson v, Nov 02 2005 *) tau[1, k_] := 1; tau[n_, k_] := Times @@ (Binomial[Last[#]+k-1, k-1]& /@ FactorInteger[n]); Table[tau[n, 6], {n, 1, 100}] (* Amiram Eldar, Sep 13 2020 *)
-
PARI
a(n) = my(f=factor(n)); for (i=1, #f~, f[i,1] = binomial(f[i,2] + 5, f[i,2]); f[i,2]=1); factorback(f); \\ Michel Marcus, Jun 09 2014
-
PARI
for(n=1, 100, print1(numerator(direuler(p=2, n, 1/(1-X)^6)[n]), ", ")) \\ Vaclav Kotesovec, May 06 2025
-
Python
from math import prod, comb from sympy import factorint def A034695(n): return prod(comb(5+e,5) for e in factorint(n).values()) # Chai Wah Wu, Dec 22 2024
Formula
Dirichlet g.f.: zeta^6(s).
Multiplicative with a(p^e) = binomial(e+5, e). - Mitch Harris, Jun 27 2005
The Piltz divisor functions hold for tau_j(*)tau_k = tau_{j+k}, where (*) means Dirichlet convolution.
G.f.: Sum_{k>=1} tau_5(k)*x^k/(1 - x^k). - Ilya Gutkovskiy, Oct 30 2018
Extensions
More terms from Robert G. Wilson v, Nov 02 2005
Comments